Punchwood
Well-known member
That's garbage workmanship. That GC needs to learn a lesson over that fiasco. I can't believe that there's actually people that think it's OK or would work with the GC on it. Unreal.
I would approach the issue a little differently. Contact the “American Concrete Institute" and ask for guidance on this issue: how the concrete was delivered and placed with pictures. Let both the GC and concrete company know that you have contacted the “American Concrete Institution. Having a credible and reliably third party investigation will usually prompt someone / everyone to step-up and correct the issue.
Having ground my floor the hard way - by hand, myself, with a little angle grinder, before doing epoxy myself, I don't think the floor is that terrible. Most of the difference in height or step can be ground over to blend in perfectly smooth. If you grind right, you won't get much grinder marks. Not to telegraph through. The biggest low spot you probably do want to fill in some more with something before you grind. Most of that I would say is ready for grinding step. When you do some of this kind of stuff yourself DIY you learn what you can do, can't, and what matters.
Alternatives to epoxy would be tile as discussed, where it isn't too important as it would be for epoxy. Good tile option here or just patch a little more, grind it, and good to go. I would use what you have for sure. I would get the contractor to admit it is screwed up and pay to have it ground down. Then you will be ready for epoxy and good to go for that. He learns a fairly cheap lesson and you get a ground floor out of it which you gotta do anyway for epoxy. - Paul
I made a mistake with concrete driveway. I went with lowest bidder and I got the lowest quality job. Never again.
I didn't even know there was an American Concrete Institute.
There is..... but I guarantee they are not going to referee your dispute. ACI is an organization that forms committees to write specs and study concrete related issues. You can reference their publications to support your case but don't expect them to engage. Sometimes free advice isn't worth what you pay for it.
The GC wasn't there for the pour? That is inexcusable !!!!!! If it were me, the "GC", and I use that term loosely, would be paying for the tear out and repour on HIS dime, and then his useless *** would be fired !
The GC wasn't there for the pour? That is inexcusable !!!!!! If it were me, the "GC", and I use that term loosely, would be paying for the tear out and repour on HIS dime, and then his useless *** would be fired !
This wasn't a commercial project , the GC should not have to baby sit his subs.
The subs should be very capable of doing what they were hired to do other wise you hired the wrong people.
That's like expecting the home owner to baby sit the GC , if he has to do that he might as well be his own GC.
From what I read so far the op said the GC wants to take care of the problem , so I say , allow him too and move on.
Then why bother having a GC at all? Commercial or not, who cares?
The home owner baby sitting the GC? That's a terrible analogy. The Gc is paid to take care of everything so that the HO doesn't have to !!
Paint, electrical, and doorknobs are one thing, but the GD GC BETTER be there for the start of framing, the pour, and the roof. If he's not, he's not much of a GC.
Then why bother having a GC at all? Commercial or not, who cares?
The home owner baby sitting the GC? That's a terrible analogy. The Gc is paid to take care of everything so that the HO doesn't have to !!
Paint, electrical, and doorknobs are one thing, but the GD GC BETTER be there for the start of framing, the pour, and the roof. If he's not, he's not much of a GC.
Then why bother having a GC at all? Commercial or not, who cares?
The home owner baby sitting the GC? That's a terrible analogy. The Gc is paid to take care of everything so that the HO doesn't have to !!
Paint, electrical, and doorknobs are one thing, but the GD GC BETTER be there for the start of framing, the pour, and the roof. If he's not, he's not much of a GC.
Project managers are hired to babysit jobs not GC's.
From what I see you are not a contractor but a inspector ? Which means what ?In your previous comment to me you said, "you don't have a clue...."
Well Mr. Know-it-all, you have your comment above *** backwards. The PM sits in his office managing the GC as far as schedules, billing, etc., usually making a weekly site visit, while the GC is on site daily !!
I've been in the trades for years and have done projects all over this country. Get a clue.
Which means that I'm the guy between the owner and the GC. Seriously, you need to stop because you most certainly have no clue.
In this case, being residential/small scale, the GC is also the superintendent. He is responsible for his subs. PERIOD.
******** !!! Yes, my main job is as a welding inspector, HOWEVER the company I work for does construction management and covers all facets of testing- concrete, soils, MPE, etc, etc.- Don't tell me what I know and what I do !!
Now, because you'd rather pick nits than move on, read back and you'll see that I highlighted what the GC/Super should be there for- and the pour was one of them. Why? Because it's effing critical and is very often one of the areas prone to failure !!!
By the way genius, WTF do you do "in the trades" ??
"You're a welding inspector and that is all. Micromanager." SCREW YOU. You have no idea what I know and how I go about doing my job.
I'm sure you are both very good at what you do and have wide knowledge of your respective fields. I didn't hire the GC to babysit anyone, I never expected him to be on site during all of the operations. I hired him to hire the correct contractors needed to build my shop. He is responsible for what the contractors do and he IS taking resposibility for the lumpy floor. He is doing everything he can to avoid removing the floor as am I. The GC has done nothing wrong with the exception of a laps in judgement with that one crew and I'm certain he would not have used them had he known.
Once again, the purpose of the post was to determine if my floor would be a good candidate for grinding not to decide if I should demo the floor or fire my GC. I have enjoyed reading all of the responses. I think I have received enough positive feedback to move forward with finding a grinder. I will post the followup after the floor is done. It may be a while. I still may try to finish the walls first so any paint won't hurt anything if it gets on the floor.
I guess I am wondering why you have to grind the floor ? Why wouldn't the GC have that done for you ? Unless you actually want to ?
