Why risk corrosion ? The efficiency benefit is almost nothing. Seems like a bad bet, and if the HX shows corrosion failure, no warranty. Please explain.
I have a boiler in my lake house that was installed in 1954 ( Kalamazoo). Never gets shut off, holds 180 in its belly, converted from oil to gas back in the early 70s... I am doing some renovation and thinking about a new boiler...this one is super inefficient, but spends much of the time holding the house at 55... Somehow I have a feeling that this one would still outlast something new...
Not feeling it though to run equipment outside of its design limits for little to no benefit.
This is why CI has no place with radiant. If you already have radiant tubing inside the cement floor, condensing is the way to go...no doubt.
Your Kalamazoo boiler was built when efficiency was of no matter. The same with a car of that age..big, heavy & sturdy. Today we need to utilize energy much more efficiently. Going green isn't just a fad anymore. Energy prices only go up, hardly ever go down. And when they go down it is for a short period of time.
OK, first and again, as far as condensation goes, the 130 is nothing to be scared of, HOW MANY GAS WATER HEATERS HAVE YOU SEEN SET TO 120 AND NOT DRIPPING? I have seen HUNDREDS of them, they normally last longer, lol since they are not cooking out the sediment {not safe for legionella though, but never seen that first hand so can't comment on it either}...
It is easy enough to test for you will know when the boiler is condensing, believe me!!!!
As far as warranty goes, NO... I have NEVER had a company want a cast iron boiler back for a warranty claim NEVER, I have NEVER had them want to come out and look at it----- NEVER.... So if it fails do to condensation {care to guess how many times I have seen this happen? yup NEVER} you will still get the warranty...
I see A LOT of "reaching" here guys...
Truth is ci will last longer and be cheaper to run, just admit it, it will feel good, I promise...
I admit the mod con will give you 10% combustion efficiency {and it really won't even do that, but I have no problem giving it the benefit of the doubt}.....
One more time to touch on condensation and setup.
The glycol in your system not having the fphx will do MUCH more damage than any amount of condensation. I have brought boilers to condensation {NOT EASY TO DO WITH OUT SLOWING DOWN THE EXHAUST FAN AND TRICKING THE PRESSURE SENSOR EVEN WHEN FULL OF 120 DEGREE WATER} and its not going to happen with a uniform boiler temp, if you have 120 front to back and control your flow rates well, you will not condensate, your burners will have a nice dry flue way to heat up...
I have seen condensation in boilers running 180 HL and 130* returns, that is very possible and will happen fast, that is not what I am talking about here. I have experience with this exact setup, I have installed and setup more of them then some techs have done systems in total!!!

