Thanks. The 9638 is the longest bladed plastic-handled screwdriver Plomb was making at the time (late 40's). Fairly rare if the thread is any indicator. There are plenty of examples of the earlier style plastic handle (that basically mimics the shape of the wooden handle) in various tips, widths and lengths, and several examples of this later style with the pebble field in various tips, widths and lengths, but I don't see too many extra long blades. Tom (@Mintgrun) and Beemer come to mind with small troves of them. I don't see a 9638 in Tom's drawer (although he makes a reference to a long one with a slightly melted handle...) but I think Beemer may have two of them.Nice finds Lugz!
That's one word for it.that midget box is a bit different...
"flummoxed, nay, confounded".....LOL.....hoping you could fit a "vexed" in there.That's one word for it.
It sounds ridiculous to admit, but I don't know how it's supposed to close, frankly. When you lower the lid, it rests on those two notches. But it rests loosely. There is no snap. No friction pressure. Nothing keeping it closed if it is jostled or upended inside a larger toolbox. And unless I'm having an extended moment of exceptional dimwittedness, it sure looks to me like it's designed that way. Nothing is bent out of shape. Everything fits very square that way. The only way it will stay closed is by forcing those notches over the side, in which case the lid is canted. A PO, maybe the same PO who resorted to black friction tape, if I had to guess, was clearly doing that, because you can see where it scraped the brilliant Chinese red crinkle right down to bare steel. I have a few dozen midget sets and I have never encountered a case that would not intuitively snap closed. I had no intention of keeping this. No desire to fill it up. It is headed for flip city, maybe with a few orphans inside. But I hate to be flummoxed, nay, confounded, by a dang box. I even tried searching the thread to see if someone had noted this bit of notorious idiocy before. Nope. So maybe the idiot in this equation is me. Perhaps Sonny or Don or anyone else with one of this style of 4785 boxes will explain.
I shared this fuzzy photo in post #13,220, which shows that one. It isn't as long (or nearly as nice) as yours. It's the fourth handle down from the top and the melted part is at the blade end, facing the camera.I don't see a 9638 in Tom's drawer (although he makes a reference to a long one with a slightly melted handle...)

Snerk. A very apt description of the logo on their failed 1925 TM application....a kind of a crucifix vampire stake apparently.

Thanks!It's the fourth handle down from the top and the melted part is at the blade end, facing the camera.
My early square corner boxes all have the same latching method. There is a notch bent into the lid that provides friction against the box bottom keeping it closed.That's one word for it.
It sounds ridiculous to admit, but I don't know how it's supposed to close, frankly. When you lower the lid, it rests on those two notches. But it rests loosely. There is no snap. No friction pressure. Nothing keeping it closed if it is jostled or upended inside a larger toolbox. And unless I'm having an extended moment of exceptional dimwittedness, it sure looks to me like it's designed that way. Nothing is bent out of shape. Everything fits very square that way. The only way it will stay closed is by forcing those notches over the side, in which case the lid is canted. A PO, maybe the same PO who resorted to black friction tape, if I had to guess, was clearly doing that, because you can see where it scraped the brilliant Chinese red crinkle right down to bare steel. I have a few dozen midget sets and I have never encountered a case that would not intuitively snap closed. I had no intention of keeping this. No desire to fill it up. It is headed for flip city, maybe with a few orphans inside. But I hate to be flummoxed, nay, confounded, by a dang box. I even tried searching the thread to see if someone had noted this bit of notorious idiocy before. Nope. So maybe the idiot in this equation is me. Perhaps Sonny or Don or anyone else with one of this style of 4785 boxes will explain.





Well, it seems obvious now! Lol. I saw that little dimple to the left of the lifting lip in the middle, but I didn't think it was factory. Mine was worn or just not made right. I enlarged it, making it deeper with a punch, and that did the trick....a notch bent into the lid...

So you did! "Here's the filler port, but why waste the Freon when the dang A/C is busted?"In my defense, I did post photos of the front. See #13,956, Pic 2.

Nice find. But PLVMB punches, chisels, and drifts and the like were made from hex stock. I think that might be a scratch awl.Added a Plvmb punch today:
PLVMB punches, chisels, and drifts and the like were made from hex stock. I think that might be a scratch awl.



What's interesting to me is how the dimples reveal what I believe to be their manual placement with a punch. I've looked at all the early 4875's on this thread that I could find and they're all in slightly different positions. Some are higher up. Some, like that one, are so close to the edge it barely made it....and I had to bend the latch back into the correct position.
...before I realized it was not going to be another quippy example of your extended refrigerant analogy!Just goes to show that if your primary or sole job on the line is to...
Found this Plomb midget box at the flea this morning. It's also the first midget box I have had with these notch closures. Something is amiss, it won't stay shut, and I think that accounts for the black tape residue racing stripe.


But does it snap closed sufficiently was the question.One more.