To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Point and shoot camera

buco

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
650
Location
Mississauga / Croatia
Hi all,

I know this place isn't a photography forum, however there are alot of people on this board with diversified hobbies. Please help recommend a point and shoot camera? I'm looking for something small.

Its for my wife, she has a big camera, Canon 40D i think. Thats fine, but with its bag and lenses its heavy and bulky.

We are looking to upgrade a point and shoot that we have. It's a Canon and is aging. Looking for a carry with us camera, for road trips, evenings out with friends, etc.

I'd like something that can just slide easily into my front pocket for traveling.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

fflintstone

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
2,722
Location
MOFnowhere Mi.
I have VERY crappy luck with point and shoot cameras. I did a search here and found several threads. consensus was canon was a good brand. I bought one 2 months ago and have used it a bit. I HATE that it uses AA bateries instead of a batery that charges thru the usb.
 
OP
B

buco

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
650
Location
Mississauga / Croatia
I've been reading, thing is the technology changes so fast with that ****. Always more cameras out on the market, with updated technology.
 

rlitman

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
24,579
Location
Long Island
My primary camera is a DSLR, and I don't even try to make any point and shoot compete against that.

But there are times a DSLR is just too risky to use. For that, I have a Nikon AW100. It is the model that can be dropped onto concrete, and is waterproof.

It doesn't have the zoom that you can get out of models with lenses that extend, but it still takes a pretty decent picture, shoots HD video, and I don't have to worry about it being destroyed, so it goes everywhere (even took it to the waterpark and dunked it a few times).
 

Davefr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
11,815
Location
OR
It depends on your budget. If you want what's regarded as the best compact P&S then get the Sony RX100. (around $600).

If cost is a concern then you can't go wrong with the Canon S series. (S95/S100/S110). You can pick them up for $200-300.

If a slightly larger P&S isn't an issue then look at the Panasonic LX7 for around $300. It's a runner up to the RX100 but not as pocketable. (unless you have larger pockets)
 

kythri

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
6,330
Location
Lebanon, OR
I've been incredibly happy with my Canon SD1400 IS, but I'm far from any kind of expert or photographer.
 

twiggles

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
124
Location
Ohio
You cant go wrong with a Canon S series, G12, or G15. I have a couple of DSLRs, but I find myself grabbing my G12 most of the time...FWIW, I would classify myself as an advanced hobbyist.
 

LEVE

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
1,727
Location
On the Willapa
You haven't mentioned the quality of the picture you're snapping. For about 90% of all my photos I use my iPhone's camera. It's about as "point and shoot" as you can get and still have pleasing quality. I like it because I don't have to carry an extra electronic device.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
for a point and shoot that is small and easy to carry. with decent low light shooting. Canon s110 would be a good option. For something more advance the olympus xz1 or 2 or the panasonic lx5 or 7. These will have about the same low light ability as the canon. But the canon S110 is really small. Not a lot of zoom, but takes really nice photos in the evening without a flash.

If you want something that is close to a dslr in low light ability. Look at the canon g1x. It is a bit bigger then a point and shoot, but it is allot better in low light.
 

Stuart in MN

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
22,997
Location
Minneapolis
I've had good luck with Canons. I like the Elph line as they are the smallest but they still take good pictures. Canon also has very good customer service if you do have a problem.
 

ricleh

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
1,447
Location
Sacramento, CA
Leica D-LUX4

P1000155_zpsac2ea68b.jpg


Or Panasonic DMC-ZS8 with Leica lense.

L1010439_zps2f1570a9.jpg



They both take good pictures and are easy to carry and use.
 

Turbo_Prop

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
297
Whatever you decide on, best pricing will probably be at B&H Photo. My company has a dealer account with Canon, Sony, Nikon and many others. Usually the online price at B&H is lower than our dealer cost.

I like the Nikon Aw100. Olympus and Canon also make some very nice P&S cameras.

Some new features worth considering are built in WiFi and GPS. The wifi makes it so easy to upload pictures and the built in GPS provides a pretty good geo stamp. Typical cameras can put a date stamp on a picture, but having the geo data will make remembering where the picture was taken, might come in handy twenty years from now, or for your off spring.
 

454ragtop

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
5,011
Location
Carver, MA
Have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 that I like a lot, Large LCD, Leica lens, image stabilizer, and a ton of other features that I can't remember. Stupid good camera, $100. shipped to my door when it was on sale from Sears.
Jim
 

XFIRE

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
17
Location
Orlando, FL
Have always had good results with the CANON brand at all levels.

By far the WORST camera I ever owned was a "Casio" ! ! ! !

Can't say enough negatives about the service and camera !!!!!

I would stay away from that brand.
 

honcho

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,288
Location
Near Sodom & Gommorah (aka Wash. DC)
I've had great success with Canon point and shoot cameras over the years.

I happen to like AA battery powered cameras, but they are becoming more rare due to the intensive power demands of cameras. Many people don't like AA powered cameras because typical alkaline AA batteries don't last long. Rechargeable NiMh batteries work well, but if you're going to have to take the batteries out and recharge them, people think I'll just get a camera with a rechargeable pack. My answer is using Energizer Lithium disposable AA batteries. Yes, they are expensive but they do deliver the power, especially in digital cameras. However, in a pinch, regular AA batteries do work and you can buy them anywhere in the world.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

dale500

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
137
The new Canon G15 is a super camera. It is a little big for your shirt pocket but the image quality is superb. We recently got one for my wife and the DSLR hasn't been out of it's bag since. It has probably the fastest lens available on a point and shoot and works great in low light. She found a cool looking retro leather cover/case from Amazon and she is super happy.

Dale
 

Monte

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
12,664
Location
Germany
are there cheap +good digital cameras which can make black/white pictures ?
 

Turbo_Prop

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
297
are there cheap +good digital cameras which can make black/white pictures ?

Most will. But it is very easy to convert them with software. For example, iPhoto which is part of Mac OS can apply several affects, to include B&W.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
are there cheap +good digital cameras which can make black/white pictures ?

There are point and shoot cameras with BW art filters, some of the sony cybershots has that feature. But a program normally does a nicer job. You can download pisca for free, and it can do black and white editing.

Also allot of the editing software package with the camera, will convert them as well.
 
Last edited:

RCL

Well-known member
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
344
The Canon SD series are great little cameras.
Price is very reasonable.
 

bart1

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
1,697
Location
Alabama the Beautiful
I like my Panasonic. Good build quality, Leica lens, fantastic rechargeable battery life, high amount if optical zoom and very compact.
 

Monte

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
12,664
Location
Germany
just googled around a while and it seems the "monochrom" B/W feature is standard nowadays.... add 16 megapixels, HD video and panorama feature so i think i´ll look into a Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3...
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
panny makes really nice point and shoot camera. But I would go to sature or something. Bring a sd card with you. Each camera brand has different jpeg engine. And they developed the jpeg differently. The red colors form a panny jpegs for some is not as pleasing.
 
Last edited:

Hiball

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
14,027
Location
Missery
Don't most of today's camera have a "Easy" picture setting that essentially is point and shoot? I know my hand me down "pink" Sony that my wife outgrew and gave me for taking to the shop and taking pictures of greasy tools and Jacks does. I'm definitely no expert, and only fiddle with the flash settings and the little flower icon for up close and personal stuff.
 

kythri

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
6,330
Location
Lebanon, OR
Honestly, I think most any digital pocket camera sold under any of the brand names that have been making cameras for a couple decades are going to work perfectly for 95% of the people out there.

I paid something like $200 or $250 for my Canon (albeit, with gift certificates and rewards vouchers) when I picked it up a couple years ago, and I know that I could have picked up a camera that will do just as much as I've actually done for probably $100 (or, free after the gift certs and vouchers).

I bought my sister a ~$100 Fujitsu digital P&S for Christmas about 6 months after I bought my Canon, and when I was playing with it, I really couldn't tell a difference between the two when looking at photos I took.

Unless you're going to get real serious about photography, I can't see spending a bunch of money on one of these things - and if you are real serious, you'd probably be buying significantly higher-end stuff in the first place, and not looking at the low-end to middle-end of the market.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
In daylight, you will really not notice much difference form the higher price larger sensor point and shoots like the s110. But when shooting indoors like a dinner party. The image quality difference is very apparent.

the small 1/2.23 sensors that most point and shoot do not preform well pass 800iso. the larger 1/1.17 like the lx5 form panny and the canon s110 will preform well up to 1600iso.
 

Geurt

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 5, 2011
Messages
284
Location
The Hague, Holland
I asked the same question here not so long ago. After some good tips I bought a Canon Ixus 125 HS. This has been a really good purchase. It works nice on the automatic setting and makes some nice HD video's aswell.
 

2oolhound

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
5,918
Location
BC Canada
I can't see spending too much on a camera of this caliber (point&shoot). You can figure in 8 months the manufacturer of your XYZ camera will introduce the XYZa which will have 2x the megapixels, faster glass, anti-quakeshake and it will be only 1/2 the size and cheaper. Just know that your XYZ camera will still do what you bought it to do so you don't really need to upgrade.

Important features are:

The Glass - Canon, Nikon, Leica have all been making lenses for over 100 years so these makers are pretty safe regarding their lenses. Chances are they've made the lenses on the sony or panasonic etc cameras.

Maximum Aperture - This is the diaphragm in the lens that lets light in, F-2 is good for a point and shoot. F-2.8 is more common and this number will change as you zoom but the maximum at the wide setting is a good reference point.

I'll explain further so this number has more meaning. Aperture value is expressed as a fraction related to 1. example - 1:1 or 1:1.8 or 1:2 etc. Basically 1 (on the left of the colon) is the amount of light that exists outside the lens and the next number (to the right of the colon is the amount of that light that passes through the lens. So 1:1 means all the light outside the lens will pass through the lens. 1:2 means only half of the light outside the lens passes through the lens onto the sensor. Apertures are round shaped so their numbers represent their area squared, F 2, F 2.8, F 4, F 5.6, F 8 etc. These squared values are all half of the value of the number in front or double the value of the number following. The smallest number is the biggest opening. BUT WAIT!!! you just want a point and shoot! OK but the aperture is important to get a grasp of. Just one last thing, aperture effects dept of field which is the depth of focus or what is in focus. Big aperture (big opening) like f 2 is a shallow depth of field so the front of the wrench you're shooting is in focus but the back is blurry. You need a small opening like F 16 or so for a greater depth of field to keep the whole wrench in focus (turn more lights on so you can use a smaller aperture, You're going to love her old 40D in the shop!).

Anti-Shake - was a Canon invention so Canon is always right on top with this technology. It's no substitute for learning to properly hold your camera when releasing the shutter but it is a nice feature

Chip Type - CMOS is pretty well the norm in point and shoot cameras and the CMOS chip has seen drastic improvements over the last 10 years. It will have some advantages over a CCD imager, the biggest being cost as they don't require a clean room for manufacture like CCD's do.

As mentioned the physical size of the chip will permit more sensors and likely better processors and therefor reflect the quality and price but keep in mind, the next best one is only 8 months away so a big jump in price for a little bigger sensor is not always money well spent.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
Actually cmos has only been in point and shoot for about 2 years. Sony was the first make a cmos sensor for the 1/2.23 sensor in their hxv5 camera. It gave the point and shoot much better image quality at 800iso. But still not much better pass that. Even today is you shoot over 800iso with the tiny sensor, you will run into allot of noise with the cmos sensors.

The cmos has been the main stay of dslr for about a decade now. And they are routinely shoot at 3200 iso without issue at the apsc size of 1.5x or 1.6x crop. And the newer ones are decent at 6400iso. And on ff sensor, they shoot at 12800 and 25600 pretty well.

With glass, all the big brands have good lenses for point and shoots. Some have even higher grade lenses for their upper levels ones. Sony has g lenses and c. Zeiss, panny has leica, olympus has their zuiko.
 
Last edited:

Givl Reggin

Banned
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
936
Location
Hawaii, USA
Last edited:

805gregg

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2011
Messages
272
Location
Ojai, Ca
I'm always camping, rafting, mtn climbing etc. NIKON AW100!!!!

Waterproof, freezeproof, dropproof, etc..... http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005IGVY92/?tag=atomicindus08-20

That's my camera, great photos plus 1040 videos, I always take that with me on vacation, no worrys about an expensive DSLR, I just keep it in my pocket, going swiming, no problem, 16 days in Fiji, rained for 13, no problem, I love it, plus it has a built in GPS, you can't go wrong with Nikon
 

amolaver

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
834
while i am far from an pro photographer, i know enough that comparing my wife's canon s100 results vs my 7d (w/L glass), i'm damn impressed with that little camera. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005MTME3U/?tag=atomicindus08-20

i think the s110 is essentially the same but with gps or wifi or something along those lines. i know it uses the same sensor/processor - http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canon-powershot-s110.

we got so spoiled taking amazing images with the SLR, the old P'n'S just didn't cut it anymore. the S100 really does take great photos - highly recommended.

ahm
 

LG63

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2012
Messages
1,003
Food for thought- If your current phone doesn't have a decent camera there's a good chance your next one will. I have a Samsung Gallaxy III and haven't used my Canon point and shoot since I got the phone. Dropbox makes the pics instantly available on all my devices, it's the best "tool" I've acquired in the last year.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom