Same experience with the Ender 3 for me.I also went with creality and bought an Ender 3 pro a couple months ago. It printed perfectly right out of the box but I wanted to bulletproof it and be able to print high temp filaments.
Using the printer is the easy part, figuring out a cad program, slicer settings, and how to modify your firmware takes some time but has been well worth it IMO
If you're just looking to print STL files off the internet you should be up and running in 2-3 hours its pretty amazing really
Recommendations come down to what your goals are and what kind of features you have to have along with your ability to modify the printer and understanding of coding.What everyone using for 3D printer? What are some things you with you got or mistakes you learned. Looking to get one here soon.
Thanks
Recommendations come down to what your goals are and what kind of features you have to have along with your ability to modify the printer and understanding of coding.




To be clear, the Replicator 2 (and Flashforge Creator X) do have a heated bed. And with Sailfish firmware (most modern ones are already loaded with this), you can look at regular G-code, and then simply run it thru a converter program to export out .x3g (what the printer actually reads). Running a heated bed with simple single pane glass means (at most) hairspray, and often simply dry.@will335i hits the nail on the head here.
I just got into 3D Printing about a year ago. The design side of things I have been doing forever. I learned the hard way and bought a Makerbot Replicator as my first printer. Complete waste of time (and money) unless you like using glue to get your prints to stick to a cold bed (no heat option). Makerbot does not allow you to access the G-Code thus you cannot see anything other than a result and nearly impossible to tune other than factory calibrations.
I made the choice based on a Consumer Reports and wished I had looked else where for a second opinion. Lesson learned.
To be clear, the Replicator 2 (and Flashforge Creator X) do have a heated bed. And with Sailfish firmware (most modern ones are already loaded with this), you can look at regular G-code, and then simply run it thru a converter program to export out .x3g (what the printer actually reads). Running a heated bed with simple single pane glass means (at most) hairspray, and often simply dry.
The original Replicator is a decade old printer, which is no longer being produced.
Prusa has incredible instructions and comes with gummy bears.
Again, I was referring to the Replicator 2, a printer first released in 2012, with a wood frame. The Flashforge Creator Pro was rleased in 2016, and the Creator Pro 2 was released in 2020.
The Replicator Plus shows a review date of 2016 via PC Mag, which is a different printer.
Hence my.comment about clarifying any confusion. Sounds like the one you have doesnt have a heated bed, but most of the Makerbots and Flashforges I have encountered do.
This is because some patents ran out in late 2000's or early 2010's. The company which held the patent was I think the only one that made them before (for industrial use only, and extremely expensive...).This also highlights something important with 3D printing. It is a new technology that is seeing rapid improvements. There was a big shift around 2016-17 that has seen big increases in quality and a crash in prices.
There are $1000-1500 3D printers available today that can match the performance of pro level printers from just 7-8 years ago.
$200 printers have reached a level where they are quite useful, a huge jump in quality from the rather crude $1000+ hobby machines that were available 10-12 years ago.
Same here. Larger prints with sharp corners and high infill density can pull up slightly with PLA and PETG on my non-enclosed Prusa. I'd like to build an enclosure, but will probably just go with one from Clearview Plastics. They look alright to me.I have had some prints warp or come partially loose from the bed because of the temperature variations down in my basement. Usually has only happened when printing with PETG, PLA doesn't seem to be as picky.
I've had an Ender 3 Pro for about two and a half years now, before that I briefly owned an Anycubic Delta printer. While the Delta is faster and (arguably) can do a little better with fine detail, it was a pill when it came to leveling and other mechanical quirks that made me spend more time working on it than printing. Ender 3 does everything I really need a 3D printer for.
My only "upgrades" have been to connect it to a Raspberry Pi to use with Octoprint, a PEI bed, and solid silicone bed mounts. It stays in the basement so noise isn't an issue. An enclosure has been a "'round 'tuit" project for a while. I have had some prints warp or come partially loose from the bed because of the temperature variations down in my basement. Usually has only happened when printing with PETG, PLA doesn't seem to be as picky.
Same here. Larger prints with sharp corners and high infill density can pull up slightly with PLA and PETG on my non-enclosed Prusa. I'd like to build an enclosure, but will probably just go with one from Clearview Plastics. They look alright to me.
Surprised you guys are having problems with PETG; it normally sticks so hard it breaks apart print bed surfaces.
Heated bed at 80c and Overture black PETG at 255c (white/grey at 240-245c) has been producing nothing but perfect bed adhesion.
Surprised you guys are having problems with PETG; it normally sticks so hard it breaks apart print bed surfaces.
PEI textured heated bed at 80c and Overture black PETG at 255c (white/grey at 240-245c) has been producing nothing but perfect bed adhesion.
The upgrade path is Magnetic PEI spring steel build plate > Microswiss all metal hot end > TMC 2208 steppers (for near silent printing).
Dang that's a lot of time to reverse engineer those parts. Nice result though!@will335i hits the nail on the head here.
I just got into 3D Printing about a year ago. The design side of things I have been doing forever. I learned the hard way and bought a Makerbot Replicator as my first printer. Complete waste of time (and money) unless you like using glue to get your prints to stick to a cold bed (no heat option). Makerbot does not allow you to access the G-Code thus you cannot see anything other than a result and nearly impossible to tune other than factory calibrations.
I made the choice based on a Consumer Reports and wished I had looked else where for a second opinion. Lesson learned.
After doing research and looking here on GJ I ended up with a Pursa i3 MK3S+. Bought it assembled. Arrived August 24th and I have done 300+ hours of printing since without a hick-up. I did recalibrate the Bed from Zero once just to try it.
I love having the ability to add a program stop to add hardware, magnets or bearing where needed. Color changes are a nice feature too. Reliability and safe are a concern. More so the safety side of things. Most of my prints run overnight in the shop while I am up at the house.
The only thing I don't like about it is the Print Size is limited. But I have made it work by doing multi-part assemblies. Hoping the come out with a bigger foot print. I would like a 24+ x 24+ bed with about 16 min height. 2 Color printing would be a plus too.
This one was finished at about 6 am after 19 hours of printing:
Used Solidworks 2021 to create the design. Took about 4 hours to measure everything and create the assembly. Out putting the STL took about 10 seconds. Slicing took me about 15 minutes. I tried to add a program stop first to add 6 Magnets @ 2.6mm. That worked.
Next I tried adding a Color change stop at .6mm from the top. That didn't work? Not sure what happened??? Probably operator error. I'll dig into that when I get home tonight. I printed the base in black and wanted to do the lettering in white.
Everyday I try something new with either Solidworks, slicing or the printer.
On the hunt for a large format printer...and still looking at the 3D Metal Printing. Really want to get into that!!!
No, there are a lot of better options than the microswiss. The 3d printing subreddits are a good place to stay on top of the latest and greatest but things have been moving fast.Is that still the best FFCP hotend upgrade?
Yeah, I’m relatively up-to-date on the scene but I don’t know about the FFCP specifically. I thought it might have some proprietary carriage that couldn’t use the more recent hotends for some reason.No, there are a lot of better options than the microswiss. The 3d printing subreddits are a good place to stay on top of the latest and greatest but things have been moving fast.
I guess it depends on what your definition of best is. Is there another you prefer?Is that still the best FFCP hotend upgrade?
My knowledge of Micro Swiss all metal hotends is from their kits for Creality printers. In that arena, I would say any of the newer style hotends with bimetallic, thin-wall heatbreaks are going to give better performance. The Dragonfly, for example, is a drop-in replacement with a similar price to the Micro Swiss and generally regarded as a better performer. But the FFCP is a bit of a different beast and one that I'm not familiar with which is why I asked.I guess it depends on what your definition of best is. Is there another you prefer?
My knowledge of Micro Swiss all metal hotends is from their kits for Creality printers. In that arena, I would say any of the newer style hotends with bimetallic, thin-wall heatbreaks are going to give better performance. The Dragonfly, for example, is a drop-in replacement with a similar price to the Micro Swiss and generally regarded as a better performer. But the FFCP is a bit of a different beast and one that I'm not familiar with which is why I asked.
Higher flow rates are definitely one aspect of it. But the thin-walled heatbreaks are also better at preventing heat creep, which is a frequently-reported problem with the Micro Swiss hotend, or at least the Creality replacement kit ones.It sounds like by better performance you mean high flow rates (for faster printing). I haven't messed around with any bimetallic thin walled heatbreaks (not even sure anyone makes them for ffcp), but likely wouldn't consider it for my own use because the hardened steel used in the microswiss hotends gives me the longevity (abrasive filaments) and heat limits im looking for.

The biggest problem with PLA is that it is exceptionally hygroscopic and fails quickly when placed under prolonged tension.Qidi X-Plus here, it is my first machine and I have been running it about two years now. I had a logic board fail on it within the first year, they got a replacement out to me quickly, aside from that, it’s been consistently good. I’ve been working with TurboCAD for years so that’s what I draft in, and I use the Qidi slicer software to prepare the gcode. I haven’t done some of the really nice work that some of y’all have posted but it’s been very handy for a lot of small parts, brackets, spacers, etc for various projects I do. No yoda heads here… lol. For example, I just completed a pergola for my house, welded steel with vertical walls of composite decking. I made about 150 spacers that lock in the slats for that project, see the picture below.
One of my engineers has been telling me to switch to ASA filament, anyone else using it? I’ve printed mostly PLA+ that I get from 3D-Fuel and it’s done well by me but I think I am ready to step my game up and start playing with other materials.