Sorry about that, was still working on the post after I made it, so I decided to delete it while I finished it.
kctyphoon said:
1.) No one said they were
2.) You need to brush up on basic electrical theory. 18v @ 12.0 Ah has the same total energy as 54v (Flexvolt nominal voltage) @ 4.0 Ah. The battery holds 216 watt-hours of energy in either mode. Same as the Milwaukee 12.0Ah
3.)Your point?
4.) Yeah, and it comes with two batteries, a charger, and a 120v plug in wall adapter to run the saw directly from mains if you wish.
5.) Which battery packs? I only saw references of "0 degrees" on a couple of M18 battery packs
6.) There is nothing wrong with 18650 cells. Higher voltage means you do not need cells capable of delivering high sustained currents, so the 18650 cells will suffice just fine. Milwaukee's stubborn decision to stick with 18v is forcing them to use larger cells capable of delivering higher sustained currents.
Like I said many times before, low voltage - high current is more expensive, less reliable and more complex to implement.
Milwaukee chainsaw - you guys were right.. it's a total turd
L O L. Oh yeah it's faster than a gas saw that's been painted with all the branding removed that sounds like it can hardly get out of its own way. Seems really legit to me.
I did some digging to figure out what saw they used - and no wonder why they removed all the branding - the comparison is absurdly lopsided. It's a Stihl MS170. Which is literally Stihl's lowest-end and cheapest chainsaw.
The Sithl MS-170 is:
1.) A 30cc saw (While Milwaukee keeps claiming compared to 40cc saws in their marketing)
2.) 8.6 pounds vs. the 14 pounds of the new M18 HD Chainsaw
3.) $170 vs the $400 of the new M18 HD Chainsaw