Private Lugnutz
Well-known member
You do see the patent document cite an Indestro Catalog No. 20-S that I already alluded to and to which matthew subsequently picked up on as well, right? You seem to be ignoring it. I think that's what the October 25, 1955 date is referring to. Again, it sure looks to me like when Barcalo was submitting their application (Nov. 23, 1955) they cited the most recent they could find. I see that there's a Catalog No. 22 dated 1959 in ITCL. No. 20 (1952), No. 20-S (1955) and No. 22 (1959) seems like a logical sequence to me.
This explanation doesn't call into question the logic of the ad in the 1952 Hardware Age for Indestro Catalog No. 20 confirming that No. 20 was published in 1952.
This explanation doesn't call into question the logic of the ad in the 1952 Hardware Age for Indestro Catalog No. 20 confirming that No. 20 was published in 1952.




























