The shaft diameter is worn as well by the picture which would cause a wobbly sheaveThe easiest solution would be to mill a new key way on 180deg from the damaged one.
Why would you need to index a v belt sheave? Why would you need to index a flat pulley or a polyv pulley?I have an old Craftsman saw that my brother got as a present from our parents when he was in high school in the mid to late seventies so he could build a cedar sauna in their basement.
I sort of inherited it around 1990.
It has the same crappy arbor and pulley attachment, and the same wear. Everyone here brags on how great USA made tools were back in the day, but wtf.. they were poorly designed. Who in their right mind would design something to transfer 2hp through a woodruff key and set screw. Keys should be used for indexing only, not torque transfer.
I have come up with a couple more Craftsman saws, but the later ones are direct drive, which would certainly be an improvement compared to the crappy belt drive.
Mine still works, sort of. I don’t use it much anymore, though.
I have an old Craftsman saw that my brother got as a present from our parents when he was in high school in the mid to late seventies so he could build a cedar sauna in their basement.
I sort of inherited it around 1990.
It has the same crappy arbor and pulley attachment, and the same wear. Everyone here brags on how great USA made tools were back in the day, but wtf.. they were poorly designed. Who in their right mind would design something to transfer 2hp through a woodruff key and set screw. Keys should be used for indexing only, not torque transfer.
I have come up with a couple more Craftsman saws, but the later ones are direct drive, which would certainly be an improvement compared to the crappy belt drive.
Mine still works, sort of. I don’t use it much anymore, though.
You don’t need to index it. That’s the point. You don’t drive something with a 2 hp motor through a key. That’s bad engineering.Why would you need to index a v belt sheave? Why would you need to index a flat pulley or a polyv pulley?
While I will admit that compression taper bushings such as QD are better, the titans of industry such as martin, TB woods, and gates have been using keys/keyway/keyseats, both square and woodruff to transmit torque on V belt drive systems in millions of applications for well over a 100 years. Gates invented the v belt in 1917. Keys were used on flat belt pulleys for 100 plus years before that to transmit torque.
"Torque transmission by keys is the most common and widely used power transmitting method."
furthermore, all the good cabinet saws are belt drive, from the unisaw, powermatics, and even felder and hammer sliding saws, not direct drive.
millions of machines, many of them industrial running much more than 2hp are used everyday, for years on end and have for hundreds of years. Thats standard engineering.You don’t need to index it. That’s the point. You don’t drive something with a 2 hp motor through a key. That’s bad engineering.
There should be some sort of substantial axial clamp load or interference fit. No need for a key .




-My reply should not be taken as "piling on" or one-upping. I'm hoping to add the exposure I've had over to numerous engineered applications of power transmission.Keys should be used for indexing only, not torque transfer.
-Not to question your experience but are you certain this end of the shaft is NOT for a pulley? OP states that it is a blade arbor but also says it's where the smaller pulley mounts. I'm using sheave and pulley as interchangeable words, for some industries they are different components.The shaft diameter is worn as well by the picture which would cause a wobbly sheave
*****Its not a pulley*****
Simply google ‘difference between sheave and pulley’-Not to question your experience but are you certain this end of the shaft is NOT for a pulley? OP states that it is a blade arbor but also says it's where the smaller pulley mounts. I'm using sheave and pulley as interchangeable words, for some industries they are different components.
V Belts ride on sheaves, flat belts ride on pulleys. Just because a lot of people bastardize it doesn't mean its right. They are not interchangeable and is an aberration.-Not to question your experience but are you certain this end of the shaft is NOT for a pulley? OP states that it is a blade arbor but also says it's where the smaller pulley mounts. I'm using sheave and pulley as interchangeable words, for some industries they are different components.
Sure, and in your same catalog you link you can find V-pulleys, so the manufacturer uses both terms interchangeably.V Belts ride on sheaves, flat belts ride on pulleys. Just because a lot of people bastardize it doesn't mean its right. They are not interchangeable and is an aberration.
What's the point of language if anyone can just make up what it means or change the definition on any given day.
Go to TBWoods, Martin, or the inventor of the V belt, gates, and they call it sheaves.
https://www.gates.com/us/en/power-transmission/power-transmission-components/sheaves.html
I wouldn't toss it so easily. There are plenty of parts on eBay and possibly new parts available. It would be a fairly easy repair and if you don't want to keep it it should sell for $150.Thank you for the input. That's why I posted the question here. Perhaps I should have said belt drive thingie next to the blade.
I bought the saw from a friend who needed the money so there is no emotional connection. It can go away.
My birthday is tomorrow . . . but truth is, My need for a table saw is not that great and I have other tools.
where in the gates catolog will you find v pulleys? You will find b belt idler pulleys, which is correct as it rides on the back (flat) part of the belt.(and is flat)Sure, and in your same catalog you link you can find V-pulleys, so the manufacturer uses both terms interchangeably.
Kind of screws up your point, don't it!
If you Google up V-pulleys you will find thousands of pulleys, often from manufacturer's web sites.
You make a good point. That said, who cares? You and everybody that read it knows what he meant. Further, Craftsman calls it a pulley. So, since we need it to be correct, in this case, it truly is a pulley. I try not to be the language police on the internet. Why bother. After all, it isn't a skill saw, it is a circular saw unless he is actually talking about a skilsaw. It isn't a saws all, it's a reciprocating saw unless we are actually talking about a milwaukee Sawzall. But I digress. Lot of words get batardized over the years. At some point *** hole only meant the hole in an ***, these days it means much more.V Belts ride on sheaves, flat belts ride on pulleys. Just because a lot of people bastardize it doesn't mean its right. They are not interchangeable and is an aberration.
What's the point of language if anyone can just make up what it means or change the definition on any given day.
Go to TBWoods, Martin, or the inventor of the V belt, gates, and they call it sheaves.
https://www.gates.com/us/en/power-transmission/power-transmission-components/sheaves.html
If I started calling you "little girl" would you get upset? Of course you would. But why would you, because words and their meaning matter. You can be part of the problem or part of the solution. I choose the latterYou make a good point. That said, who cares? You and everybody that read it knows what he meant. Further, Craftsman calls it a pulley. So, since we need it to be correct, in this case, it truly is a pulley. I try not to be the language police on the internet. Why bother. After all, it isn't a skill saw, it is a circular saw unless he is actually talking about a skilsaw. It isn't a saws all, it's a reciprocating saw unless we are actually talking about a milwaukee Sawzall. But I digress. Lot of words get batardized over the years. At some point *** hole only meant the hole in an ***, these days it means much more.
Oh it was pretty tough, I put the word pulley in their search and come up with this one in a few seconds. I am sure there are more.where in the gates catolog will you find v pulleys? You will find b belt idler pulleys, which is correct as it rides on the back (flat) part of the belt.(and is flat)
It says "Light duty sheaves"Oh it was pretty tough, I put the word pulley in their search and come up with this one in a few seconds. I am sure there are more.
Let me hold your hand,
https://www.gates.com/us/en/search.p.7807-000000-000000.html
Try reading the page again.It says "Light duty sheaves"
Pulley is not on the page!
Ok, sorry, your right. Pulley gives you 54 results, one result is a sheave and has pulley in the middle of the text.Try reading the page again.
You are not doing well.
Argue all you want, it just shows that manufacturers, (and one you used to back up your point!), use the terms interchangeably.Ok, sorry, your right. Pulley gives you 54 results, one result is a sheave and has pulley in the middle of the text.
Type in sheave and you get 30 results that are correct.
That means there is at least one idiot working at gates. The best places on earth have at least one idiot that slips through the cracks.
Oh it was pretty tough, I put the word pulley in their search and come up with this one in a few seconds. I am sure there are more.
Let me hold your hand,
https://www.gates.com/us/en/search.p.7807-000000-000000.html
There are so many terms out there that are used interchangeably. Are you willing to die on the hill every single time it doesn't line up with your idea?If I started calling you "little girl" would you get upset? Of course you would. But why would you, because words and their meaning matter. You can be part of the problem or part of the solution. I choose the latter
No I am done. If people want to dumb down the English language, then so be it. People think they are cats and dogs nowadays, who am I to stand in the way of "progress"There are so many terms out there that are used interchangeably. Are you willing to die on the hill every single time it doesn't line up with your idea?
How do you feel about the terms truck vs pickup? Couch vs sofa? Driveway vs lane?
Are you going to argue about each of those? Guess what? YOU are the only one with a problem.
Are you trying to indicate a direction relative to his position or indicating that he is correct ?Ok, sorry, your right. Pulley gives you 54 results, one result is a sheave and has pulley in the middle of the text.
Type in sheave and you get 30 results that are correct.
That means there is at least one idiot working at gates. The best places on earth have at least one idiot that slips through the cracks.
I am acknowledging that he indeed found one link out of many does indeed have the word "pulley" in the text of the page, even though thousands of other ones on their catalog, and that page in the title uses the word sheave.Are you trying to indicate a direction relative to his position or indicating that he is correct ?
I've never heard the term "sheave" before. Right or wrong, those look like pulleys to me. In any case I learned a new word today.
I knew what you meant. I was just joking around a little with the language police hat on.I am acknowledging that he indeed found one link out of many does indeed have the word "pulley" in the text of the page, even though thousands of other ones on their catalog, and that page in the title uses the word sheave.