theoldwizard1
Well-known member
Re: Teardrop Camper -- Structural Thoughts
Look at pic #2. No TRIANGULATION ! Either sides to side or front to back ! A little push on the side puts the front wall in shear. Yes, the sheet of interior and exterior plywood help (a lot) if they are glued and nailed/screwed to all supports. Still those 90° corners for the structure are going to rely on the glue/nails of the panels to prevent them from moving.
If the whole panel is made up of square "boxes" then with out a "skin" bonded to each side, I can not understand how one would be better. The shear load of a horizontal member would be picked up a the joint with the vertical member. If that joint flexes, it will act as a moment arm on the connection of the vertical member to the bottom plate. Triangulating these corners make a huge difference. (Think gusset plates in a race car.)
Also, if you are using square tubing, you can "notch" the tubes together. I can't find a picture, but you sort of make a fish mouth on the intersecting tubes and then weld. All edges are fully connected. (Production shops would never do this; too "fussy".)

Last comment. The wall bottom plates need to attach to a metal part of the frame. PERIOD.
Certainly wood is not as strong, especially at connections (Lap joints are better; more surface area for glue. You would have to use dovetail joints and then all the support pieces should be hardwood.)But a wooden frame doesn't seem to have much strength on its own. The one in this picture could be pushed over pretty easily. Wood flexes and has limited strength to hold onto fasteners.
Look at pic #2. No TRIANGULATION ! Either sides to side or front to back ! A little push on the side puts the front wall in shear. Yes, the sheet of interior and exterior plywood help (a lot) if they are glued and nailed/screwed to all supports. Still those 90° corners for the structure are going to rely on the glue/nails of the panels to prevent them from moving.
Angle is more resistant to shear load than square ? Really ?I can strengthen the wall-to-roof seam with square tubing and I can strengthen the wall-to-floor seam with square tubing. But does one of those offer more benefit than the other? I know angle-stock is less resistance to shear than square tubing, but with the wrap-around-and-down front wall (from the roof) providing lateral strength, combines with shear-type walls fore and aft, would square tubing at the seams be doing any appreciable amount of work?
If the whole panel is made up of square "boxes" then with out a "skin" bonded to each side, I can not understand how one would be better. The shear load of a horizontal member would be picked up a the joint with the vertical member. If that joint flexes, it will act as a moment arm on the connection of the vertical member to the bottom plate. Triangulating these corners make a huge difference. (Think gusset plates in a race car.)
Also, if you are using square tubing, you can "notch" the tubes together. I can't find a picture, but you sort of make a fish mouth on the intersecting tubes and then weld. All edges are fully connected. (Production shops would never do this; too "fussy".)
You can make your own structural panel, by building a frame out of square tubing, with appropriate triangulation (bigger triangles are better than smaller ones), attaching your finish material to one side, bonding it to the frame. Then spray glue and fit pre-cut rigid foam panels. More spay glue on the outside of the foam, your choice of adhesive to the structural tube and apply the pre-cut out skin. THIS IS BASICALLY HOW ALL RV SIDE PANELS ARE MADE. Many are using 1" square tubing.Thanks. I'm looking around. Finding 5x10 sheets of any of these composite/laminate/structured materials is the trick. I've got sources now for aluminum composite panels and corrugated plastic. But I'm also looking into other options.
Well, my suggestion will be very rigid in shearAnd I've already done a bunch of testing with about a dozen different adhesives, including (for structural bonds) the 3M VHB tapes, Dow 995, and 3M ScotchWeld structural epoxy adhesives. I think flexibility is important, considering the vibration the thing will be subject to.
Good luck ! Never had drafting (background in EE and CompSci), but I have educated myself in a lot of mechanical/structural engineering. With Sketchup, you have to think 3D ALL THE TIME. Simple drawings take me a long time, but I as usually quite proud of the out come !As I continue with this project, I hope to learn enough about Sketchup to be able to post illustrations of what I'm planning ...
Last comment. The wall bottom plates need to attach to a metal part of the frame. PERIOD.
