UserNameAttempt3
Well-known member
When I do field work I used m12 stuff. Got a packout bag and a few boxes, plus a few around the garage. Love their stuff and always looking at deals.
TTC on youtube did a video on this ratchet recently, lots of positive stuff about this latest entry.I finally found a 3053-20 ratchet at Home Depot and got my hands on it. Just the ergonomics and feel are a huge improvement over the older "high speed" fuel (2567-20) model. I wasn't able to actually try it out. Just wondering who's been able to give one a run?
My 2567 will be on FB marketplace asap with proceeds going to purchase this ratchet.
![]()

I picked up the 1/4, 3/8 and 1/2 models last week, upgraded from the high speed (Gen 2?) ratchets. After using these for a week I had ZERO hesitation selling all my high speed ratchets, these are awesome. Lighter, stronger, and the ergonomics are fantastic. The one thing I immediately noticed is that despite having identical clamshells, these are their own ratchets (the high speed 1/4 and 3/8 models were the same with just a different size gear in head). When you run these, the 1/4 makes a different sound than the 3/8, which makes a different sound than the 1/2. I also really like that I didn't have to spend extra money to swap out the gear/switch assembly to something that I could actually use with gloves on - these came with a switch that sits proud of the head, even with the boot on. So far so great.
Very nice!I picked up the 1/4, 3/8 and 1/2 models last week, upgraded from the high speed (Gen 2?) ratchets. After using these for a week I had ZERO hesitation selling all my high speed ratchets, these are awesome. Lighter, stronger, and the ergonomics are fantastic. The one thing I immediately noticed is that despite having identical clamshells, these are their own ratchets (the high speed 1/4 and 3/8 models were the same with just a different size gear in head). When you run these, the 1/4 makes a different sound than the 3/8, which makes a different sound than the 1/2. I also really like that I didn't have to spend extra money to swap out the gear/switch assembly to something that I could actually use with gloves on - these came with a switch that sits proud of the head, even with the boot on. So far so great.
![]()
I'm glad you're liking them as much as I am. I was able to quickly sell my old high speed ratchets for $100 each (I'm glad I sold them when I did, because this weekend I saw HD clearing them out for $130 brand new in store), plus I had a coupon to use at HD so I wound up coming out of pocket just over $200 to upgrade all three. I use the boots more out of protecting the stuff I'm working on moreso than protecting the tool, but I also like the idea of keeping grit and dust out of the grease in the head. My Snap-on ratchets all came with them so it's just something I'm used to and like.You son of a ***** ()...because you posted this, I made the upgrade to the 3/8" to test these out and damn, its good. I'm buying the 1/4" and 1/2" this weekend, but I have a co-worker who is buying my old M12 stuff, so this will only cost me $200 out of pocket.
Are the head covers worth it? I like the switch instead of the paddle so far. I hope they make an extended reach with the same guts, that would be killer.
The Milwaukee parts diagrams for the 1/4 and the 3/8 models show different part numbers the heads (the High Speed ratchets shared the same part number between the 1/4 and 3/8 ratchets), so my guess is that this isn't a simple parts swap of the gear assemblies like it was for the High Speed 1/4 and 3/8 ratchets. The heads on the new ratchets are all now the same size, so I don't really have any reason to swap them like I did for the High Speed ratchets.Very nice!
Can you tell if it looks like the 3/8 anvil assy might fit in the 1/4 ratchet? Or better yet, would you be willing to try?
I love my High Speed ratchet, something happened to it & mine spins at 1K RPM no load which I love. I really only have a need for 3/8 & I rather have speed than the higher torque the new one has. If the 3/8 anvil happens to fit in the 1/4 model then I'll probably buy one.
Yep, I did look at both parts lists (1/4 & 3/8) & while the yokes (what MW calls it) are different p/ns I still have hope. Even if the overall head size might be the same, they are all shaped different which would explain the different p/ns for yoke. Because of which the boots even have different p/ns cause they are shaped different as well.The Milwaukee parts diagrams for the 1/4 and the 3/8 models show different part numbers the heads (the High Speed ratchets shared the same part number between the 1/4 and 3/8 ratchets), so my guess is that this isn't a simple parts swap of the gear assemblies like it was for the High Speed 1/4 and 3/8 ratchets. The heads on the new ratchets are all now the same size, so I don't really have any reason to swap them like I did for the High Speed ratchets.

I picked up the 1/4, 3/8 and 1/2 models last week
@Steel_Rain I wouldn't call it "unhealthy," but it's definitely a different, lower pitched noise.
Following up on my own post. I picked one of these up last night. "Goldilocks" is the correct term for this ratchet. The ergos are so much better than the Fuel. I haven't run many fasteners with it yet to verify the improved torque.I finally found a 3053-20 ratchet at Home Depot and got my hands on it. Just the ergonomics and feel are a huge improvement over the older "high speed" fuel (2567-20) model. I wasn't able to actually try it out. Just wondering who's been able to give one a run?
My 2567 will be on FB marketplace asap with proceeds going to purchase this ratchet.
![]()
I think its printed on ..probably done either by the manufacture or supply house but my guess would be factory since it appears to go under the top label.Sorry OT, but Astra Zeneca ladder?
And is the name on the fiberglass with safety labels attached over, or was it just painted on carelessly and rubbed off the label?
Does anyone actually own the newest M12 1/4" impact stubby?
I have the 3/8" and 1/2" already, but I thought this would be useful for lighter assembly work, belly pans and other 10mm (and lower) applications.
If so, can you comment on it?
We can ask the Astro guy he posts hereSorry OT, but Astra Zeneca ladder?
And is the name on the fiberglass with safety labels attached over, or was it just painted on carelessly and rubbed off the label?
The subcompact isn’t made in 1/2”, only 3/8” and 1/4”. If you’re referring to the one you linked, I own it in 3/8”, FWIW. Initial feedback here. I’ll probably pick up the 1/4” soon, I absolutely LOVE my 3/8”.Does anyone actually own the newest M12 1/4" impact stubby?
I have the 3/8" and 1/2" already, but I thought this would be useful for lighter assembly work, belly pans and other 10mm (and lower) applications.
If so, can you comment on it?
Sorry OT, but Astra Zeneca ladder?
And is the name on the fiberglass with safety labels attached over, or was it just painted on carelessly and rubbed off the label?
I think its printed on ..probably done either by the manufacture or supply house but my guess would be factory since it appears to go under the top label.
are they made by snap onThe subcompact isn’t made in 1/2”, only 3/8” and 1/4”. If you’re referring to the one you linked, I own it in 3/8”, FWIW. Initial feedback here. I’ll probably pick up the 1/4” soon, I absolutely LOVE my 3/8”.
![]()
I too want to get the 1/4 as well. I am still getting hung up that they limited it to 100 ft lbs to probably save the anvil or sockets.I’ll probably pick up the 1/4” soon,
I actually like that they limited the 1/4” to 100 ft lbs, just as they did the newest 1/4” ratchet - otherwise it would be really easy to start snapping bolt heads. Also, I think the tools being the same exact size makes that risk even greater (on both the impact wrench and the ratchet).I too want to get the 1/4 as well. I am still getting hung up that they limited it to 100 ft lbs to probably save the anvil or sockets.
Yes.are they made by snap on
It turns out big pharma needs facilities maintenance too...
While this is smart, I am unfortunately dumb and just like the idea of more power and capability in theory. In reality my use pattern is really around 8-10mm vs the 16mm 1/4 socket I think I used once upon the time.I actually like that they limited the 1/4” to 100 ft lbs, just as they did the newest 1/4” ratchet - otherwise it would be really easy to start snapping bolt heads.
Would this honestly be much different than a regular impact driver we already all got plus a 1/4 square adapter?Does anyone actually own the newest M12 1/4" impact stubby?
I have the 3/8" and 1/2" already, but I thought this would be useful for lighter assembly work, belly pans and other 10mm (and lower) applications.
If so, can you comment on it?
Here in the addiction thread we only buy more tools not adapt what we have. Remember here we are "addicted"!Would this honestly be much different than a regular impact driver we already all got plus a 1/4 square adapter?
I have the old brushed motor 1/4" impact, which I believe is rated at 40 ft lbs. The only reason I really use it is because it's such a low torque I don't really need to think too much about what I'm doing. I can't see any reason the new one would need to be more than 100 ft lbs, just use 3/8 if you need higher torque.I too want to get the 1/4 as well. I am still getting hung up that they limited it to 100 ft lbs to probably save the anvil or sockets.
Here in the addiction thread we only buy more tools not adapt what we have. Remember here we are "addicted"!![]()
The subcompact isn’t made in 1/2”