Which XC do you use? I think they have 3, 4, 6?
The Milwaukee addiction thread! :)
- Thread starter JustinsGr8
- Start date
Which XC do you use? I think they have 3, 4, 6?
danski0224
Well-known member
Saw this on Reddit. lol.
"Ryobi" has the distinct possibility of being a whole lot more fun and a LOT less maintenance and headaches than "DeWalt" or "Milwaukee"...
If she is of age, obviously... hard to tell.
Kaervak
Well-known member
I have both XC3.0 and XC6.0 that I've used with the stubby. It shouldn't make a difference which XC pack you use, just as long as it's XC.
MikeF2316
Well-known member
subarub4
Well-known member
Whats the difference between the Milwaukee 2754-20 and 2861-20
DFB
Well-known member
A lot of power
One is a 3/8" drive "compact" impact wrench rated @ 210ftlb 4 modes
https://www.milwaukeetool.com/Products/Power-Tools/Fastening/Impact-Wrenches/2754-20
The other is the 1/2" drive Mid Torque model rated for up 600 ftlbs (450 foward) 3 modes
https://www.milwaukeetool.com/Products/Power-Tools/Fastening/Impact-Wrenches/2861-20
Some difference in overall size and weight Mid torque is larger (but not by too much)
Depends what you need out of a cordless wrench...that should dictate what model to choose.
I do have both
danski0224
Well-known member
The two tall ones are in opposite bikinis.
One is red with white dots, the other is white with red dots...
Nice to look at, but I'll stick with my original assessment
when I first got mine I had problems with forgetting that I left it on lower modes. I don't meant to be insulting, it's something to check. After a few misadventures and wasted time I developed a habit of checking it before each use. Only mode 3 will do regular lugs and suspension stuff. I actually do the same check with the loosen/tighten setting before each use now, after I stripped out some aluminum threads by hammering on them in the wrong direction.
Mine does lug nuts on my Passat with a 2.0 battery, no problem. I tried the 145 ft/lb lug nuts on my diesel truck with the 6.0 battery and it broke them with a couple seconds of hammering.
Wait. So mode 3 is stronger in reverse than Auto (the little arrow, 4th setting)? If so that could be my issue then.
Interesting. Looks like I may have to invest in a larger battery.
So is the difference between 3aH and 6aH just runtime duration? In other words to power difference?
Fix Until Broke
Well-known member
Yes - I was pretty disappointed in the performance until I figured this out. I've got the 2754 M18 but it operates the same way.
I just went and looked at the manual again because I thought I had read otherwise. Looks like 4th mode is the same as 3rd in reverse. Guess the setting was not my issue then...
See attached.
Attachments
DFB
Well-known member
Hate to say but IMO the 2754 is fairly lame tool. I have one and I don't really use it much, and actually use my older 2655B more. Just seems to perform better maybe the heavier socket I really don't know. What I do know that the max torque in each mode range is quite different and I have those numbers written somewhere.
And to be more truthful between the Stubby 3/8 and the 1/2 Mid Torque now neither compact sees much action.
But I still use my old 2454 often though
logixjock
Well-known member
Hate to say but IMO the 2754 is fairly lame tool. I have one and I don't really use it much, and actually use my older 2655B more. Just seems to perform better maybe the heavier socket I really don't know. What I do know that the max torque in each mode range is quite different and I have those numbers written somewhere.
And to be more truthful between the Stubby 3/8 and the 1/2 Mid Torque now neither compact sees much action.
But I still use my old 2454 often though
I was REALLY underwhelmed with the stubby, a complete waste of money IMNSHO.
You are in the minority here.
danny_barkley
Well-known member
I like mine. Am presently replacing the front suspension on my Land Cruiser, wheels bearings, steering, etc, etc. I'm using the Stubby and Mid TQ so far. They are both nice.
The Stubby is a good tool, but I think I would rank it about 150#, not 250# or 220#, whatever it is. The mid TQ has served me well for bolts tq'd to 120-150# and oxidized for 18 years so far. They both have their place, but the Stubby is over rated IMO. Call it a 150# TQ and I'm ok with that.
DFB
Well-known member
Hmmm interesting.
To truly keep it all in perspective though the STUBBY no matter what is still only a 12V tool.
It did surprise me after I got one though and I personally had thought it was just a lot hype before that. Is it "MORE" tool than like say my 2655B 1/2" compact (210ftlb rated)...hard to really say but it is impressive from a seat of pants standpoint using it.
When it comes to 18V though the Mid Torque is not that much larger than the original compacts for most jobs but packs a lot more punch
To truly keep it all in perspective though the STUBBY no matter what is still only a 12V tool.
It did surprise me after I got one though and I personally had thought it was just a lot hype before that. Is it "MORE" tool than like say my 2655B 1/2" compact (210ftlb rated)...hard to really say but it is impressive from a seat of pants standpoint using it.
When it comes to 18V though the Mid Torque is not that much larger than the original compacts for most jobs but packs a lot more punch
logixjock
Well-known member
Hmmm interesting.
To truly keep it all in perspective though the STUBBY no matter what is still only a 12V tool.
It did surprise me after I got one though and I personally had thought it was just a lot hype before that. Is it "MORE" tool than like say my 2655B 1/2" compact (210ftlb rated)...hard to really say but it is impressive from a seat of pants standpoint using it.
When it comes to 18V though the Mid Torque is not that much larger than the original compacts for most jobs but packs a lot more punch
I use the mid-torque for anything big and the fuel 12v impact driver with a 1/4 adapter for everything else at this point.
subarub4
Well-known member
I’m not sure the mid torque would fit behind my rear wheel hub to get some bolts off I’m still going to get the mid torque however.
I have to build up my Milwaukee tools again (long story)
I have to build up my Milwaukee tools again (long story)
danny_barkley
Well-known member
I was just working behind the front hub on my Land Cruiser. The mid TQ takes up a little more room than the stubby, but not as much as I first thought. I was able to manipulate the steering to help me that you can't with the rear though. The suspension job I am doing though is outrunning the stubby though. The mid TQ is what I am reaching for, ohh and the Fuel Ratchet.
My lugs are torqued to 150 ft/lb and the stubby will break them every time...I'd put the truth somewhere between your estimate and the rated torque. It won't break them with a 2.0 battery(at least not reliably), I'm sure the specs are with a 4.0 or 6.0 and in perfect conditions.
It also depends on whether there is any corrosion. There might be if you live in a wet or wintry or salty area. They probably rate under ideal circumstances — freshly lubricated bolt torqued to 220. Then removed. If that bolt is a lug installed with no lube or antiseize and run on salted roads in NH all winter it might need 300 lbs to remove.
You have a bad copy, unrealistic expectations or there's some other factor (rust, etc.) at play. The Stubby isn't an everything impact, but it does a whole lot. I freakin' love mine.
Caparris
Well-known member
Yeah, love mine too. It does take some beating to get lug nuts off but pretty much everything else I work on it zips them right off. I just use the big boy 1/2" M18 one if I'm doing something that the stubby won't take off
It's a kind of stupid story, but I wound up with the Stubby, the Mid and the High , and so far the Stubby and the Mid have done everything. The Stubby handles easily 80%+ of what I've thrown at it, and the High is still a virgin...
That might change depending on how grumpy the control arms are in the old E30 BMW I will be working on at some point over the Spring/Summer...
Extensions greatly reduce the applied power on the stubbies also. With a 6" extension and a deep socket they probably won't remove most lugs. I tested this many times.
After the recent discussions comparing the M12 2454 & M18 2754. I am going to see how they do with extensions compared to the stubbies when taking off 3 sets of winter tires very soon.
After the recent discussions comparing the M12 2454 & M18 2754. I am going to see how they do with extensions compared to the stubbies when taking off 3 sets of winter tires very soon.
dalehsc
ALLIANCE MEMBER
Yes ,the more connections the less torque you have at the fastener
DFB
Well-known member
Yes user preference, in general choose the blade config what you like best.
This subject...the pro and cons has often been discussed over and over.
There are many various saw models available from Milwaukee.
Economics aside FUEL versions are the most popular.
I always suggest buying the one that allows you to see the blade and the line it's cutting. If you buy it with the motor hanging off of the side where you need to see, it's much more difficult to get a good straight cut.
I can relate to that! However sometimes its nice to use your body and weight to hold the board. (Safe I know)
mashguy4077
Well-known member
Attachments
techieman33
Well-known member
It’s the M12 straight die grinder.
Kaervak
Well-known member
You're going to love the M12 inflator. I bought one about a month ago on a whim, absolutely love it. It's so much more convenient that getting the compressor going to top off tires.
Mohawk Dave
Well-known member
Agreed...plus my little hand-held trailer dolly and my yard wagons all have those ****** 10" pneumatic tires that always have slow leaks....so nice to grab the M12 and top off.
subarub4
Well-known member
Ended up ordering the Mid torque 1/2” I have a question on some impacts where they only list the nit busting torque what’s the forward torque rating?