For GTAW, use plain argon as the shielding gas.
For GMAW on anything other than steels (like aluminum, copper, titanium, etc), use plain argon as the shielding gas.
For GMAW on steels, plain argon is NOT an accepted/acceptable shielding gas for any transfer mode (short-circuit, globular, or spray mode transfer). Lincoln says so, ESAB says so, AWS says so, etc, etc.
And you can't just go and try to "just up the amps". Even in spray mode transfer, you run into "current saturation", where the wire electrode just can not transfer any more current. Yeah, the WFS does go up but the amperage doesn't change. With 0.030 steel wire, current saturation occurs at ~200 amps (WFS from ~600 to ~700 ipm and you still get the same current of ~200 amps). With 0.035 steel wire, current saturation occurs at ~280 amps and ~720 ipm WFS.
The biggest Lincoln solid wires (1/16" dia) top out at ~430 amps. Some of the Lincoln metalcored wires in 1/16" dia top out around 480 amps. Some of the 'big' FCAW (-S or -G) wires in .120" dia can max out at 600-800 amps!!! A smidge over 1000 amps in a twin-arc config (you're not doing that with a handheld gun!).
Because of the relatively low ionization potential of pure argon, there is a reduced amount of overall power/heat put into the arc/weld. With GTAW, generally not a problem, as you are letting a puddle form and -then- adding filler. Slow travel speed and more overall 'heat' put into the weld puddle. With GMAW on steel using pure argon as the shielding gas, you would typically end up with the characteristic 'finger' penetration profile of a deep very narrow 'finger' of fusion into the workpiece(s). As well as a more unstable arc as you try to crank up the voltage and WFS/amperage.
GMAW on steel with plain argon? Nope. You won't find ANY acceptable/accepted WPS for GMAW on steel with 100% argon gas.