shelteredV
Well-known member
Have a collet shatter on a 12 HP shaper with a door panel bit in it, now you're talking some carnage...
Snickers, I bet that hurt for awhile. What happened on mine was that I was ripping a piece of 24" ply down to 22". The ply was 1/2". I guess it flexed. I saw it moving away from the fence towards the end of the cut and tried to correct it. That is when I got the kickback. I should have stopped and shut the saw down...
.. riving knife is really only for when you aren't using good technique feeding stock through the saw...but I guess it can help.
...The fence should NOT be parallel to the blade. Fence should be farther at the rear of the blade than the front, just slightly.
Please elaborate.
Removed my table saw gaurd the day I got it. If your going to be ripping a piece like that you should not be using the fence. You should mark your 22” and use the angle guide in the slide set at 90. This way there is no fence to bind against. The issue is improper use of the tool imo. We are all guilty of it. You. None of the job site saws that I encountered had the guards on them either. They can be a danger in their own right. Also the panel saws at school never had if I remember correctly.
I believe he is referring to the post before his which is the one below in red:
"fence system that has been squared up to the miter slot within that same tolerance as the blade"
I try not to comment on every kickback thread we have.
But this is probably 75% of the problem with kickback accidents. (the other 50% is operators truly are not focused on what they are doing.)
The fence should NOT be parallel to the blade. Fence should be farther at the rear of the blade than the front, just slightly.
I don’t see what was wrong with my post. You don’t cross cut plywood against a fence. It will bind.
You can use a mark on the plywood and use the angle guide to keep the plywood square. No binding can happen because there is nothing to bind to.
I’m curious to what he has a problem with. Not sure why he had the time to write the comment he did but not say why.
I agree with fence being a touch wider at the rear.
Thanks for the tips guys...I had no idea it was supposed to be wider at the rear. It makes sense and I will make the adjustment to the Biesemeyer fence.
Thanks for the tips guys...I had no idea it was supposed to be wider at the rear. It makes sense and I will make the adjustment to the Biesemeyer fence.
If you make the fence to the blade wider on one end of the fence, it won't make/cut a parallel piece.
For safety, read here:
https://www.woodcraft.com/blog_entries/preventingtablesaw-kickback-it-s-not-an-acceptable-risk
Yes it will.
We all have our ways we’ve used for years. A bigger thing in mind is being comfortable with what your doing. If your not then you need to stop. Because that’s when bad stuff happens.

If you make the fence to the blade wider on one end of the fence, it won't make/cut a parallel piece.
If you make the fence to the blade wider on one end of the fence, it won't make/cut a parallel piece.
For safety, read here:
https://www.woodcraft.com/blog_entries/preventingtablesaw-kickback-it-s-not-an-acceptable-risk
To align the fence, mark one tooth, rotate it to the fore, and measure its distance from the fence (Photo A). Next, rotate the tooth aft, and perform the same measurement. (Using the same tooth as a reference removes any blade warp from the equation.) Adjust the fence until the measurements match. If you’re unsure of perfect parallelism, angling the fence outward 1⁄64" or so at the rear of the blade is a safe bet.