It is really and very messed up here you go:
http://www.indeed.com/forum/job/aut...OMOTIVE-TECHNICAINS-DONT-GET-PAID-WELL/t32112
Are you a tech?TECHS ALLOW THEMSELVES to be taken advantage of.
Organize. Get a better deal. Or open your own shop and take the business from the dealership. The dealership has to compete, and its FAR cheaper to pay good techs...far cheaper........then lose the business....
paying the tech 1/5 of shop rate is a RIPOFF.
It matters because essentially if someone has never been a tech the should not comment about how poorly we are paid and how the dealers make buckets of money. It is blatantly arrogant and ignorant.^ Who cares, I can't wait till this industry organizes.
'The fallout of actually paying mechanics, and actually charging people for car repairs, will be epic.
Honestly, I kind of thought that I was compensated fairly well for my job when I was working hourly. It's not rocket surgery. It really depends on how you are treated by your employer. I've worked for shops that were nothing but stress, and at shop or two that was relaxed enough to enjoy what I was doing and take pride in it.It matters because essentially if someone has never been a tech the should not comment about how poorly we are paid and how the dealers make buckets of money. It is blatantly arrogant and ignorant.
If everyone commenting is an employed tech, or has been, I respect your opinion.
But to those who are not it is like me telling all dentists how they should operate their business. Or just because I own a computer I know how IT professionals should do their job and/or get paid.
I am also currently at an hourly shop and I feel I am compensated more than fairly. That was the point I was making, there were comments made earlier about dealerships essentially stealing from their techs and customers. I just get worked up by people outside of the industry thinking they are the authority on our livelihood.Honestly, I kind of thought that I was compensated fairly well for my job when I was working hourly. It's not rocket surgery. It really depends on how you are treated by your employer. I've worked for shops that were nothing but stress, and at shop or two that was relaxed enough to enjoy what I was doing and take pride in it.
It matters because essentially if someone has never been a tech the should not comment about how poorly we are paid and how the dealers make buckets of money. It is blatantly arrogant and ignorant.
If everyone commenting is an employed tech, or has been, I respect your opinion.
But to those who are not it is like me telling all dentists how they should operate their business. Or just because I own a computer I know how IT professionals should do their job and/or get paid.

gross profit needs to drop.
Ding ding ding!
If federal minimum wage had kept up with the rate of inflation here in USA since the '70s, the minimum wage would be over $22/hr. I'm willing to bet half the guys on this forum with Snap-On tool boxes barely make even that.
On a similar note, since the '70s, average take home pay for a CEO is over 230% today over what it was back then.
More relevant to present day, since our economic crash of 2007 the average wage for the bottom 99% has fallen 19% below what it was prior to the recession. Meanwhile, top 1% is enjoying over a 25% increase in average income.
It's sad, it's a culture thing and that's all the better for the shop owners... some folks just don't want to hear it. But spending all that hard earned money just to make yourself more money, makes "the man" more money too...at your expense, not his. I mean, you just spent $1000 on new tools...how many hours will it take for you to make that $1000 back?
Personally I encourage a career change to one where your technical skills are valued, and where you are not required to spend so much of your own money just to keep up. Of course, this bit of encouragement only applies to the guys who are sick and tired of dropping thousands on tools while their family is still struggling hard..this may be a small percentage of techs, but I know you're out there watching.
This [emoji121]How can anyone have this opinion and believe that the cost of EVERYTHING wouldn't increase in proportion?
I am not wealthy, I do not own a business. But I do understand that if the government forces businesses to pay $22/hr as a minimum then your Bigmac meal would cost you $20, your Dunks coffee will be $10. And if $22/hr is a minimum then that $360 inner tie rod job would be $800+ (I use that example because I took my 4Runner in for an oil change and that's what they wanted to do the pass side inner tie rod). We all know mechanics are not going to want to make minimum wage. This example will apply to EVERY aspect of your life, every single thing you pay for...if you can think of it then it will cost exponentially more.
No matter what you think, the socioeconomic scale will always be there. If you don't like the money you're making, if you think you're not being treated/compensated well enough THEN LEAVE! There is ONE REASON that owners get away with paying $hit money....you're accepting $hit money. Don't look to the government to fight your battle, too many people do that already, and that's not what the true America is all about. Nobody is required to work for a certain person/business. If they pay **** then leave. Every person that accepts the pay is contributing to the "issue" you point out, and are the truly responsible party. I say the same thing to my best friend, who works his a$$ off in the landscape construction field. He barely cracks $20/hr, and works harder than anyone I know. He runs crews, is the owners foreman, and does all of the equipment repairs. Whenever he starts bitching about pay I am quick to let him know that he is the reason he makes that $$. He doesn't do anything about it, and doesn't bother trying to get out.
And not for nothing, but I have plenty of friends that make good money as a car mechanic. They have a strong work ethic, good money management skills, and work hard to excel in their work. Sure, they had to run through different shops/owners to finally land at a good one...but that's life.
You're not poor because someone else is wealthy....no matter how you spin it.
Sent from Taptalk
How can anyone have this opinion and believe that the cost of EVERYTHING wouldn't increase in proportion?
I am not wealthy, I do not own a business. But I do understand that if the government forces businesses to pay $22/hr as a minimum then your Bigmac meal would cost you $20, your Dunks coffee will be $10. And if $22/hr is a minimum then that $360 inner tie rod job would be $800+ (I use that example because I took my 4Runner in for an oil change and that's what they wanted to do the pass side inner tie rod). We all know mechanics are not going to want to make minimum wage. This example will apply to EVERY aspect of your life, every single thing you pay for...if you can think of it then it will cost exponentially more.
No matter what you think, the socioeconomic scale will always be there. If you don't like the money you're making, if you think you're not being treated/compensated well enough THEN LEAVE! There is ONE REASON that owners get away with paying $hit money....you're accepting $hit money. Don't look to the government to fight your battle, too many people do that already, and that's not what the true America is all about. Nobody is required to work for a certain person/business. If they pay **** then leave. Every person that accepts the pay is contributing to the "issue" you point out, and are the truly responsible party. I say the same thing to my best friend, who works his a$$ off in the landscape construction field. He barely cracks $20/hr, and works harder than anyone I know. He runs crews, is the owners foreman, and does all of the equipment repairs. Whenever he starts bitching about pay I am quick to let him know that he is the reason he makes that $$. He doesn't do anything about it, and doesn't bother trying to get out.
And not for nothing, but I have plenty of friends that make good money as a car mechanic. They have a strong work ethic, good money management skills, and work hard to excel in their work. Sure, they had to run through different shops/owners to finally land at a good one...but that's life.
You're not poor because someone else is wealthy....no matter how you spin it.
Sent from Taptalk
You're not poor because someone else is wealthy....no matter how you spin it.
Sent from Taptalk
Spoon, you're still not getting it. If someone is in debt because of a tool box, the problem isn't the tool companies, the industry they work in or their bosses. It is the individual. They chose to be broke. If they aren't making what they feel they are worth, they are either A: working at the wrong shop and need to speak with their actions by leaving, or B: really aren't as good as they think they are. If they were in some other profession, guess what, they would still be broke. Doesn't matter if it was buying TV's, jewelry, cars, they would still be broke. I just had a lady use 3 credit cards to pay a $300 bill on her S550. I have a 750li in my bay right now that the customer had to wait for their tax check so they could fix it. Do these people need to blame Mercedes and BMW? Blaming a tool company or industry for a tech being poor is like blaming McDonalds for making you fat. I still don't understand why or how the size of someones tool box can possibly affect another individual...

How can anyone have this opinion and believe that the cost of EVERYTHING wouldn't increase in proportion?
I am not wealthy, I do not own a business. But I do understand that if the government forces businesses to pay $22/hr as a minimum then your Bigmac meal would cost you $20, your Dunks coffee will be $10. And if $22/hr is a minimum then that $360 inner tie rod job would be $800+ (I use that example because I took my 4Runner in for an oil change and that's what they wanted to do the pass side inner tie rod). We all know mechanics are not going to want to make minimum wage. This example will apply to EVERY aspect of your life, every single thing you pay for...if you can think of it then it will cost exponentially more.
No matter what you think, the socioeconomic scale will always be there. If you don't like the money you're making, if you think you're not being treated/compensated well enough THEN LEAVE! There is ONE REASON that owners get away with paying $hit money....you're accepting $hit money. Don't look to the government to fight your battle, too many people do that already, and that's not what the true America is all about. Nobody is required to work for a certain person/business. If they pay **** then leave. Every person that accepts the pay is contributing to the "issue" you point out, and are the truly responsible party. I say the same thing to my best friend, who works his a$$ off in the landscape construction field. He barely cracks $20/hr, and works harder than anyone I know. He runs crews, is the owners foreman, and does all of the equipment repairs. Whenever he starts bitching about pay I am quick to let him know that he is the reason he makes that $$. He doesn't do anything about it, and doesn't bother trying to get out.
And not for nothing, but I have plenty of friends that make good money as a car mechanic. They have a strong work ethic, good money management skills, and work hard to excel in their work. Sure, they had to run through different shops/owners to finally land at a good one...but that's life.
You're not poor because someone else is wealthy....no matter how you spin it.
Sent from Taptalk
We all know mechanics are not going to want to make minimum wage.
Nor should they. It is a specialized skill, one that should require years of training. Most people rely on their skills to keep them safe (brakes, airbags, etc) but complain about the labor costs. Makes me scratch my head. If you can do better yourself, then do it. If not, pay the man for a piece of mind. Stop complaining about it.
To keep it on topic, I have a big toolbox because I wanted it. I may waste space, but it is neatly organized. I could probably fit twice as much in my toolbox if I stacked and racked, but choose not to. I could fill it with Harbor Freight but choose not to.
The tool box police will not come to take you away, so do what makes you happy or effective. If you can get by daily life with $100.00 of Chinese-made tools, then that is good on you. I choose not to follow that path, but do not look down on you for your choice. You should not look down on me for my choice either.
You guys are correct for the most part. A very old business principle states that a man determines his own worth, he's worth what he's willing to work for, no more no less. I'm afraid it's not really that simple. In a lot of business the options are controlled by the big guys. No one will want to admit it but your success probably has as much to do with luck as good decisions, being in the right place at the right time and capitalizing on the opportunities you were lucky enough to get.
Spoon, you're still not getting it. If someone is in debt because of a tool box, the problem isn't the tool companies, the industry they work in or their bosses. It is the individual. They chose to be broke. If they aren't making what they feel they are worth, they are either A: working at the wrong shop and need to speak with their actions by leaving, or B: really aren't as good as they think they are. If they were in some other profession, guess what, they would still be broke. Doesn't matter if it was buying TV's, jewelry, cars, they would still be broke. I just had a lady use 3 credit cards to pay a $300 bill on her S550. I have a 750li in my bay right now that the customer had to wait for their tax check so they could fix it. Do these people need to blame Mercedes and BMW? Blaming a tool company or industry for a tech being poor is like blaming McDonalds for making you fat. I still don't understand why or how the size of someones tool box can possibly affect another individual...
I wish the government would let me make that decision on my own. :/
I feel that it is a problem deeply rooted in the American culture. I don't see the Europeans getting fat off of McDonalds. Our government FINALLY imposed regulations on McDonald, outlawing their "Super Size". Wonder why.
I am assuming you are comfortable with the government regulating our volume of intake.
Again...no one is forcing anyone to eat at McDonald's. No one is forcing anyone to eat a super size meal. And even if they outlaw the 'Super Size' meal, it doesn't prevent someone from ordering 2 'normal' size meals. And please don't start that ******** where the poor are economically 'forced' to eat fast food...we could all eat much better for less or the same money if we spent the time to PREPARE it ourselves.
Logically flawed in concept: The government should never be allowed to limit caloric intake (as crappy as McDonald's is)...everyone's caloric requirement is different...regardless of what the one size fits all/easy route government says.
If you are gaining more weight than you want...exercise more or eat less. If you cannot grasp this simple concept...no amount of regulation will save you.
Logically flawed in execution: Remember Bloomberg's soft drink fiasco a couple year's ago in NY? Imposing restrictions on one retailer vs. another? How do you prevent multiple cups of soda? A 5 year could logically destroy this legislation.
Life is not fair...but the government should not be making it more unfair.
let's start banning banning:
http://www.vox.com/2015/3/19/8258585/los-angeles-fast-food
Hahaha that was quite funny!
Don't get me wrong here though... I am actually against governmental regulations on stupid things like caloric intake.
You say it about the same thing. You use caloric intake as the example in both cases. You say that it needs to be regulated and then you say that you should be able to regulate it yourself. It is not the same as your example above. Things need to be spelled out for you over and over. At least have the courtesy to read the stupidity in your previous comments before continuing to spew useless info out into the world wide interwebs.I stated facts, and then stated that I am against governmental regulations on stupid things like caloric intake.
Just because I state a particular fact doesn't mean I actually agree with the premise. Definitely not contradictions. To be more clear and as an example, I am a gun rights advocate. Not a gun control advocate. At the same time though, I feel that health care and pharmaceutical companies should have more regulations to adhere to. Two different things, they cannot be considered contradictions.
I really wonder about having to continuously spell things out here.. it's almost like playing cards with my brothers' kids.
![]()