2ndGearRubber
Well-known member
No, just use it.
I used to attend estate/business auctions that sold stuff owned by pro mechanics, or stuff from good size pro auto shops, likely started business/careers during the 50's, 60's.
All various brands tool truck stuff. Tools, stools, test equipment, ect.
Just looked like old, Not rusty, well worn tools. Looking at all the other personal **** in the auction, looked like they made pretty good dough, over the years.
Not sure when this strange obsession over tools started.
Grandpa was a master carpenter/woodworker, he owned a German made nothing. Dad was a pro mechanic his stuff was whatever NAPA or Sturm's Auto parts had in stock.
I generally just enjoy a well made tool which does the job I ask of it. A good tool makes the job better, easier, faster, and more profitable if that's your job.
I like solving problems, and tools solve problems for me. Obsessed? Maybe. But I sure do like a well thought out solution. I used an M22x1.5 split die today for the first time, ebay cheapo non-name, and boy was I happy with that purchase.
uh... the exaggeration is on the weekend warrior side, eh?
There's zero substantive, metric-based, statistically-significant information that would say an Icon tool isn't up to daily use. Most of what is posted here is opinions. Most testing on YouTube tends to be biased one way or the other, or with folks like Project Farm well-intentioned but often flawed testing. Bs.t even the guys at TTC would admit their testing does not meet the bar for statistically-significant sample size to be considered data. But as a guy who interacts often with the part of my company that does reliability and durability testing, it's the closest thing I've seen to the kind of repeatability that allows for comparison of tests from multiple sessions and well-designed targeting. The Tools Tested guy is pretty good too, at least with stuff like Torque Wrenches (repeatable, large cycle counts, decent methodology, etc.), but also suffers from sample size.
Funny though. The Icon stuff does pretty darn well with those last two guys...
I also hear enough guys on Reddit who say they use Icon in their job as techs that I think the "light duty" thing is a crock. The only beefs I hear are the narrow span of the product portfolio and the lack of easy purchase for singles.
Ultimately I don't care if people want to spend their money on Snap On. I have zero doubts about the overall quality. I have some Snap On tools. I have a lot of Icon. I also have SK, Matco, Ko-ken, Tekton and a variety of other brands. I also have zero doubts that a full time tech could take my set and do just fine. I have no problems with my tools not performing or breaking.
Other than flare wrenches and a very-few other things, there's no substantive gap in the performance of the tools. If the truck-model service is "worth it" to you, then it's your choice. But the "investment protection" line people throw around is a load of ****. You could buy two sets of Icon everything (for backups while you exercise the warranty) and put the difference the single Snap On set would cost in an IRA or other investment in a simple index fund and do vastly better financially. And your work would still get done.
I'm not sure what you mean. There's a LOT more going on with a ratchet than a wrench, and a bad ratchet can make a job miserable. My Sunex ratchets are genuinely awful to use - gobs of backdrag and a tendency to self-reverse. My Icon, Snap-On and Ko-Ken ratchets are all great.
Does anyone say Icon isn't up to being used for its purpose? Everything of theirs I've ever seen or handled was clearly a functional tool. IDK how I look or appear in this whole thing to the reader, but the only thing negatives I have to say about them is:
1) I think better tools exist, typically for more money, which do not scale their improvement linearly with cost
2) Icon is more expensive than other brands which can still complete the job as well.
Eventually it ALL dies with daily use. I used a koken socket and HF impact extension (which was the perfect length) to remove wheel bearing bolts today on a rotten Patriot, after beating the whole thing onto the bolt with a Snap-on bronze hammer. It will all succumb to the eventuality we ourselves face. I did use a snap on ratchet to break them free then a snap on torque wrench to install, BUT I beat a Sunex 30mm onto what was left of the 32mm axle nut and still almost rounded it out. Probably should have got the 29mm. Point being lots of brands in lots of price ranges perform for me daily.
Does anyone say that Icon isn't a functional wrench? I used a $150 Sunex 8-32 set for years, still do. Amazon says I bought it in 2014. Still have those wrenches. Way too much lead-in taper on the box end was my main beef.
Having used the Napa carylyle wrenches as my SAE set, I bought a used set of snap on as the whole set wore significantly. TTC mentions these clones of Icon. I can promise you snap on, and wright, and proto makes a better wrench. Is the snap on 6 times better? No. Is the incremental value worth it to me? Yes. Icon seems like a no-brainer for ratcheting wrenches, and with the quality of the open end I'd say they're a good value. Mine are a mismatch of sets from most major brands.
The whole Icon thing reminds me of the Astro 401K air hammer I bought. I wanted to test it, so I bought it as a gift for a friend I work with. It's 80% of a snap on, for ~$120. The snap on is $550. For that $550 you can buy the 401K AND a Thor air hammer. For those chasing the last percentage points, things get very expensive. I'd tell most people to buy a 401K. I would rebuy the snap on.


