I know it doesn't fit your mowing program Mike, but I wonder what it would have looked like with the side discharge blockoff removed.
Beautiful Lawn!!!!
Your valve stem replacement reminded me of a funny memory watching a coworker attempt his first valve stem replacement. I watched him struggle for a bit trying to replace it from the OUTSIDE of the rim before I gave him a hand. You don't know until you know, right?




Mike,
Again, love the description of details.
Question: Does your Toro rider have any provisions to suspend it fully? Seems like you could use your 2-post lift to suspend your mower for undercarriage work.
What about using something like a tire tie down net for the rear tires but use it to lift instead?
Then a simple strap in to the front cross bar just inside the wheel swivel mount.
This would not require a lot of room for storage and yet allow you to "hang" the mower up off the ground as high as you like.












Mike, That looks like a tough area to get a tap into? The back two bolts?
Do you ever make a drill jig for jobs like that? Pick up the hole pattern from the cover, use a reasonably thick hunk of scrap so that the drill and tap are kept square to the head. I've done this many times for areas that you can't reach or see.
Mike, what's your opinion on helicoils vs timeserts? I've heard of helicoils failing so try to use timeserts when I need to do a thread repair. I just did a ford 5.4 blown out plug repair that had been fixed once years ago with a helicoil and that didn't hold. Just curious if they get a bad rap from user error or something else since I know you do your homework and wouldn't be using them if they were an issue.
Great pics of the Powerstroke project. I’d personally have opted for Timeserts over Helicoil myself. You should look into them for future projects. Makes a much more high quality job.
Looking forward to see the progress of this project.
Shoot Mike, you could probably jam a toothpick in the stripped holes and get that screw to bite…..works on stripped door hinge screws 🫣
I bought a set of the gator blades for my lowly Toro push mower and have the same clumping issues, I'm going back to the normal blades when they go bad. What a waste of time/money thinking they would be the ticket.










Appreciate the detailed reply Mike!Scott/Anders, I very much appreciate you guys following along and asking questions as this exchange turns into more of a discussion vs. me just posting pictures of work. That way I feel we all learn, me especially.
I can't remember who asked a similar question a couple of years ago, I think it was graham08 but not sure.
Anyways, I have used a variety of Helicoils, Keenserts and Timeserts in my 35+ years of wrenching now. I have had great success and some failures with all three as well. At work back in the 90's we had a vendor come in and demonstrate Keenserts and my boss at the time was sold on them and ordered a full set with all of the required tools and a metric ****-ton of inserts in a variety of sizes. That was pretty much all I used at work for quite a few years but then started using Helicoils at my home shop, mainly because they were less expensive as it was hard to charge a client for a one-off repair for a $100+ Timesert kit vs. a $40 Helicoil kit. However, after using the Helicoils for a while and having a high success rate, I ended up ordering several of the larger Helicoil master sets that included taps, insert tools and inserts for a range of fasteners and have just purchased additional inserts as needed over the years of use. Even to this day I have had very few Helicoil failures and those that did fail were after heavily repeated uses. I have actually had more Keensert failures than Helicoil failures to be honest.
For several years I looked at it as Helicoils were my first stage repair and the solid insert (Keensert or Timesert) were what I went to as a second stage repair. What I mean by that is the Helicoil was at least as strong as the OEM fasteners and the parent material so I looked at it that if the parent material did what it was designed/engineered to do for a while then the Helicoil would do a better job. I also liked that the Helicoil removed less of the parent material and as you know on many of the motorcylce cases, there is not much material left around even a factory drilled and tapped hole, so I didn't want to go any larger than absolutely necessary. In some of those applications there would be no way to remove enough material for a solid insert to be used without rendering the case useless. Also, I would look at some applications whereas the hole was so damaged and so enlarged that I didn't feel a Helicoil would have enough parent material to grab so I would use a Timesert or Keensert as the only possible repair.
When I was building 2-stroke race engines I used a lot of Helicoils. At some times in some applications where I knew they were prone to failing I would drill and install a Helicoil as a preventive measure knowing that even though the threads were fine while it was in my shop, the threads would fail rather soon when pushing more cylinder pressure when trying to double the horsepower output, so it was a preventive measure.
During all this was when I got into building VW engines where I started purchasing hi-po VW cases from Pauter Machine that had the machine work already done. They bragged in their literature and even on the phone that they installed Timeserts in the common failure points around the cases for better clamping force. I figured hell, if a well known machine shop was using them they must be better than Helicoils so I purchased a couple of the more common sizes to have on hand in the shop. For the applications I used them in they worked fairly well but I avoided their use in situations where I felt the parent material would be weakened too much by the size of the solid insert. I did like the Timesert a bit more than the Keensert to be honest. My thinking was, and I am not sure how accurate this is as I'm just a mechanic and not an engineer, that the Timersert would be stronger than the Keensert solely due to the threaded engagement being a stronger mechanical bond and more surface area vs. the staked sides of the Keensert. The failures I had from the Keenserts were mostly due to the stakes failing and allowing the insert to bang around and damage the threads and then fail whereas I felt the Timesert maintained a more constant and solid bond with the parent material. Not very scientific however, just an observation from various failures. Also keep in mind these were on things like gearboxes, electric motor mounts, hydraulic ram mounting and other industrial pieces of equipment that see much more adverse conditions than anything automotive would encounter.
So after many years of Helicoils being my first stage repair I have had exponentially more successes than I have failures with them. Then a couple of years ago I stumbled across Rob Wendland's YouTube channel. Rob Wendland is Terry McMillen's crew chief and has extensive knowledge in racing and has some cool videos of various projects that come through his shop. One of his videos in particular caught my attention a couple/few years ago and that was specific to Helicoils vs. Timeserts. I can't remember but it was titled something like Helicoil for the win or something to that affect. Anyway in the video he did side by side comparisons using a new insert for each test and creeping up in torque value until the inserts would fail. The Helicoil held much longer than the Timeserts. If memory serves the Timeserts were failing around the 60 ft/lbs. with 3/8"-16 fasteners whereas the Helicoil blew past that. He then started using the same Helicoil insert for multiple tests and kept going up past 90 ft/lbs. What drove this test was he was having some failures and set out to do some side by side testing using controlled parameters and even made some alterations near the end of his testing to the process used to install the Timeserts.
In all of his early tests the Helicoils held up substantially better than the Timeserts. The Timeserts were failing much sooner than the Helicoils when installing in exact materials and under the same circumstances. Near the end of his testing he was pushing the 3/8-16 inserts well beyong their normal operating range of around 38-42 ft/lbs. He was pushing them to over 100 ft/lbs. and the Helicoils were holding, he actually had a bolt yield at just over 100 ft/lbs. yet the Helicoil insert was still holding fine after about 10 uses and the Timesert failed around 80 ft/lbs. (if memory serves).
Then the last test he did he decided to drop the drill bit size required by the Timesert by approx. .020". He stated the undersize drill bit did create a bit more drag on the lip cutting tool for the Timesert insert and the tap but after forcing his way through the increased friction of the installation and then going through the thread forming procedure with the last tool that the Timesert finally surpassed the Helicoil and failed around 123 ft/lbs where the standard Helicoil actually failed around 105 ft/lbs.
So after all that work and modifying the installation process the Timesert finally surpassed the Helicoil but at nearly 3 times the torque that you would normally tighten a 3/8" fastener to and in which one would be stepping to a larger size fastener when it came to those torque values.
Sorry for the long answer to what quite possibly was a quick question, but I've put a lot of thought into these thread repair inserts over the years and although not as extensive testing and proving as Rob did, I came to the conclusion that the Helicoil in most applications will provide more than adequate holding strength. That being said, I have seen failures due to sloppy installations so for that the failure really can't be blamed on the insert. Most of the Helicoil failures I have seen were from previous repairs where I feel the installer either did not sink that first coil of the Helicoil below the surface far enough or break the tang off in the bottom of the hole. I like to go at least a full thread and two if possible below the surface to ensure the fastener won't grab that first coil and pull it up out of the hole and to be sure to break the tang off so it doesn't try to drive the insert down further into the hole or "stretch out" the Helicoil insert in the threaded bore.
Short answer, I generally use Helicoil inserts these days as I feel they provide much more strength than the original material.
Appreciate the detailed reply Mike!
I figured you had your reasons and I knew you wouldn't be using them if they were that bad. I also always wondered if it was user error that lead to all the failures I had read about. Glad to hear from a trusted source that they are good. I've had to put jobs on hold to order a timesert kit before because the only thing napa has is helicoil kits. And from reading bad things about them I didn't want to take a chance. Usually when needing an insert we already have the OH **** drawer open and don't want to take chances on a repair that may or may not work.
Looks like I should put a helicoil kit or two on my list of needs. I had just been buying timesert kits as needed because they are so much more expensive but since helicoils are cheaper they would be nice to have around so when I need them I won't need to order a kit and wait.
I favor Keenserts, but it's only because they install with standard taps and a driver for the tangs. Nothing wrong with a properly installed Helicoil. Nice work on the repair!
Was the drill for this a standard size, or did you have to come up with an oddball 1/4"-28 threaded drill to run in your aircraft right angle drill?
Great post with lots of valid points, plus a new YouTube channel for me to investigate.Scott/Anders, I very much appreciate you guys following along and asking questions as this exchange turns into more of a discussion vs. me just posting pictures of work. That way I feel we all learn, me especially.
I can't remember who asked a similar question a couple of years ago, I think it was graham08 but not sure.
Anyways, I have used a variety of Helicoils, Keenserts and Timeserts in my 35+ years of wrenching now. I have had great success and some failures with all three as well. At work back in the 90's we had a vendor come in and demonstrate Keenserts and my boss at the time was sold on them and ordered a full set with all of the required tools and a metric ****-ton of inserts in a variety of sizes. That was pretty much all I used at work for quite a few years but then started using Helicoils at my home shop, mainly because they were less expensive as it was hard to charge a client for a one-off repair for a $100+ Timesert kit vs. a $40 Helicoil kit. However, after using the Helicoils for a while and having a high success rate, I ended up ordering several of the larger Helicoil master sets that included taps, insert tools and inserts for a range of fasteners and have just purchased additional inserts as needed over the years of use. Even to this day I have had very few Helicoil failures and those that did fail were after heavily repeated uses. I have actually had more Keensert failures than Helicoil failures to be honest.
For several years I looked at it as Helicoils were my first stage repair and the solid insert (Keensert or Timesert) were what I went to as a second stage repair. What I mean by that is the Helicoil was at least as strong as the OEM fasteners and the parent material so I looked at it that if the parent material did what it was designed/engineered to do for a while then the Helicoil would do a better job. I also liked that the Helicoil removed less of the parent material and as you know on many of the motorcylce cases, there is not much material left around even a factory drilled and tapped hole, so I didn't want to go any larger than absolutely necessary. In some of those applications there would be no way to remove enough material for a solid insert to be used without rendering the case useless. Also, I would look at some applications whereas the hole was so damaged and so enlarged that I didn't feel a Helicoil would have enough parent material to grab so I would use a Timesert or Keensert as the only possible repair.
When I was building 2-stroke race engines I used a lot of Helicoils. At some times in some applications where I knew they were prone to failing I would drill and install a Helicoil as a preventive measure knowing that even though the threads were fine while it was in my shop, the threads would fail rather soon when pushing more cylinder pressure when trying to double the horsepower output, so it was a preventive measure.
During all this was when I got into building VW engines where I started purchasing hi-po VW cases from Pauter Machine that had the machine work already done. They bragged in their literature and even on the phone that they installed Timeserts in the common failure points around the cases for better clamping force. I figured hell, if a well known machine shop was using them they must be better than Helicoils so I purchased a couple of the more common sizes to have on hand in the shop. For the applications I used them in they worked fairly well but I avoided their use in situations where I felt the parent material would be weakened too much by the size of the solid insert. I did like the Timesert a bit more than the Keensert to be honest. My thinking was, and I am not sure how accurate this is as I'm just a mechanic and not an engineer, that the Timersert would be stronger than the Keensert solely due to the threaded engagement being a stronger mechanical bond and more surface area vs. the staked sides of the Keensert. The failures I had from the Keenserts were mostly due to the stakes failing and allowing the insert to bang around and damage the threads and then fail whereas I felt the Timesert maintained a more constant and solid bond with the parent material. Not very scientific however, just an observation from various failures. Also keep in mind these were on things like gearboxes, electric motor mounts, hydraulic ram mounting and other industrial pieces of equipment that see much more adverse conditions than anything automotive would encounter.
So after many years of Helicoils being my first stage repair I have had exponentially more successes than I have failures with them. Then a couple of years ago I stumbled across Rob Wendland's YouTube channel. Rob Wendland is Terry McMillen's crew chief and has extensive knowledge in racing and has some cool videos of various projects that come through his shop. One of his videos in particular caught my attention a couple/few years ago and that was specific to Helicoils vs. Timeserts. I can't remember but it was titled something like Helicoil for the win or something to that affect. Anyway in the video he did side by side comparisons using a new insert for each test and creeping up in torque value until the inserts would fail. The Helicoil held much longer than the Timeserts. If memory serves the Timeserts were failing around the 60 ft/lbs. with 3/8"-16 fasteners whereas the Helicoil blew past that. He then started using the same Helicoil insert for multiple tests and kept going up past 90 ft/lbs. What drove this test was he was having some failures and set out to do some side by side testing using controlled parameters and even made some alterations near the end of his testing to the process used to install the Timeserts.
In all of his early tests the Helicoils held up substantially better than the Timeserts. The Timeserts were failing much sooner than the Helicoils when installing in exact materials and under the same circumstances. Near the end of his testing he was pushing the 3/8-16 inserts well beyong their normal operating range of around 38-42 ft/lbs. He was pushing them to over 100 ft/lbs. and the Helicoils were holding, he actually had a bolt yield at just over 100 ft/lbs. yet the Helicoil insert was still holding fine after about 10 uses and the Timesert failed around 80 ft/lbs. (if memory serves).
Then the last test he did he decided to drop the drill bit size required by the Timesert by approx. .020". He stated the undersize drill bit did create a bit more drag on the lip cutting tool for the Timesert insert and the tap but after forcing his way through the increased friction of the installation and then going through the thread forming procedure with the last tool that the Timesert finally surpassed the Helicoil and failed around 123 ft/lbs where the standard Helicoil actually failed around 105 ft/lbs.
So after all that work and modifying the installation process the Timesert finally surpassed the Helicoil but at nearly 3 times the torque that you would normally tighten a 3/8" fastener to and in which one would be stepping to a larger size fastener when it came to those torque values.
Sorry for the long answer to what quite possibly was a quick question, but I've put a lot of thought into these thread repair inserts over the years and although not as extensive testing and proving as Rob did, I came to the conclusion that the Helicoil in most applications will provide more than adequate holding strength. That being said, I have seen failures due to sloppy installations so for that the failure really can't be blamed on the insert. Most of the Helicoil failures I have seen were from previous repairs where I feel the installer either did not sink that first coil of the Helicoil below the surface far enough or break the tang off in the bottom of the hole. I like to go at least a full thread and two if possible below the surface to ensure the fastener won't grab that first coil and pull it up out of the hole and to be sure to break the tang off so it doesn't try to drive the insert down further into the hole or "stretch out" the Helicoil insert in the threaded bore.
Short answer, I generally use Helicoil inserts these days as I feel they provide much more strength than the original material.
great job as usual , how u like that air filter box design ? lol
Great post with lots of valid points, plus a new YouTube channel for me to investigate.![]()
I get that wasn’t your intention Mike. But I sure value your opinion(s) very highly. I have only had great experiences with HeliCoil myself, I’m also very happy with TimeSert. Thanks to your referral to the crewchief on YouTube I now also know how to improve the TimeSert usage.Thanks Anders. Again, not saying I'm right or wrong, but more the conversation around it is beneficial. I was impressed with Rob's testing and how methodical he went about it so when I stumbled across it a few years back I was very much intrigued.
I would like to know your thoughts after viewing please.
I get that wasn’t your intention Mike. But I sure value your opinion(s) very highly. I have only had great experiences with HeliCoil myself, I’m also very happy with TimeSert. Thanks to your referral to the crewchief on YouTube I now also know how to improve the TimeSert usage.
A rather great channel by the way, just like yours. By the way I was apparently already subscribed to Rob’s channel. I’m kind of a hoarder when it comes to high quality shop related YouTube channels, literature and whatever. I see it as essential as high quality tools.
I’ll never know enough and I’ll never stop to try learning and improving. The longer I live the more I learn how little I really know. That’s why I’m so passionate about my work, the constant strive for improvement no matter how small it is.






























