I probably shouldn't even bother responding—your personal attacks make it obvious you're not going to have a discussion based on facts, but instead based on emotion.
I'm not faulting patriotism. I'm saying that I haven't been persuaded that America can or should become a manufacturing powerhouse the way it was 60 years ago.
Since I'm not coming at this with an emotional stake, I could be persuaded that I'm wrong. Make a strong argument. Give me some evidence to show I'm mistaken and I promise I'll look at it with an open mind.
Personal attacks? Are you that sensitive that being told you are wrong is offensive? If so I will be more careful, however its rather ironic that you're offended but claim to not bring emotion into this discussion.
I wasn't attacking you personally and genuinely did reread your post (#99) several times prior to my last response looking for something to agree with, unfortunately there simply wasn't anything available. Most of your comments regarding manufacturing are so far off that the word ignorance (a word meaning lack of knowledge, not a personal attack) really is the best description.
Electronic automation (rather than the previous mechanical automation) replacing manpower was the worry of the 60s and early 70s and has been shown repeatedly for decades to create more jobs than it replaced. You implied otherwise.
You repeatedly reference "unskilled labor" and "low" pay, suggesting this is common in manufacturing yet quite a few of this board's wealthier members are retired from or currently work in manufacturing and regularly share their skill. Many knock "button pushers," yet to be a "button pusher" today you often need months or years of specialized training. I've lost count of the former salaried computer/web/office folks who have thought manufacturing was "easy" and applied for work when their entire office closed, and have yet to meet one that was qualified for anything beyond the $14/hr-starting fork truck position. The stereotype about Bubba putting the same three screws in repeatedly is usually wrong, many lines today have multiple dissimilar products going down them simultaneously. My previous employer had 8, 12, and 16 cylinder engines on the same line with dozens of variants of naturally aspirated, 1-8 turbos, aftercooled and not, etc. Many auto plants are the same - rarely are two of the same model together on the line, and rarely is the assembler in the same station for more than a few weeks. Crossing over from assembly into production machining is much the same, to get onto a $100k+ cnc even as a "button pusher" requires a fair bit of knowledge regarding tool sharpening, precision measurement, print reading, and setup as multiple parts are run the same day or week on the same machine. Long story short - technology is constantly changing as our expectations of those using it.
Your post repeated the old narrative about greedy CEOs, again, a bad stereotype that is the exception rather than the rule. My current company president is responsible for bringing in $100M annually and earns <$250k, not too well paid but has it easy in some regards compared to others I've worked under. My previous Fortune 50 CEO earns $15M a year, sounds like a lot until you consider the position involves 300+ days traveling annually, weekly interviews with the press, and being responsible for $50B+. If thats not enough, with 18k employees and 100k+ investors he also regularly deals with wackos, slander, death threats, and other nonsense for things well beyond his control, little wonder the man has visibly aged from stress over only a few years as many POTUSes do. $15M still might sound greedy until someone mentions that even in down years every employee received a bonus, mine were never less than $8k. JMO but that CEO can keep his $15M, he's earned it, especially after 40 years with the company.
Your posts reference 60 years ago and suggest US manufacturing in the 50s was the high point but thats also rather far off, US manufacturing peaked in 1979.
You seem stuck on the concept that manufacturing is bad for the economy based on what you've seen in the media, from "economists" most of whom missed the 2008 housing bubble, 2012 mining, 2014 oil, and a few other collapses. Ironically I worked for two companies through those years who gave employees months of forewarning of the three mentioned, a few members here thought I was nuts when I mentioned saving cash to buy oil stocks two years ago. That might suggest something about media "experts." You also seem stuck on the concept that higher skilled jobs are better for pretty much everyone, yet thats very reminiscent of the mistaken belief that going to college leads to higher income. Sure, in many cases it does but in many more it doesnt. The "world economy" theory suggesting the US economy can bring in dollars primarily through management, engineering, info/IT jobs contributing technology while poorer countries handle manufacturing has one fatal flaw - we are competing as much for tech jobs as we are for low-level manufacturing jobs. Those "poor" countries like China and India are pumping out engineers, scientists, and industry leaders faster than we are. Theyre dam good and work for significantly less than their American counterparts do, its the reason why many white-collar STEM jobs have disappeared overseas. Moreover, 25 years ago the world economy theory was a wonderful new idea in the US machine tool industry, ask a few machinists who makes the best and most of the machines today (Asia) and who makes comparatively few and commonly considered disposable machines (US). Both the innovation and manufacturing have left the country in what was once a US dominated industry.
FWIW, I'm hardly basing anything on "I know a guy...." I'm basing everything on facts, history, and discussion with industry leaders. I've been a long-time student of industrial history and fortunate to meet quite a few of its leaders through work, am related to a few, and have been part of several "future executives" programs both internally to mega-corps and through professional associations. No, I'm not a somebody yet but do know enough that I will be extremely happy or disappointed in 20 years.