JazzBlueRT
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2017
- Messages
- 1,215
I see so many posts about tool quality. X brand has higher quality than Y brand and X country makes higher quality tools than Y county.
All the thousands of posts, yet not a single person has defined what they view as quality.
The Definition of quality is:
2 a :degree of excellence :grade
the quality of competing air service—Current Biography
b :superiority in kind
merchandise of quality
Using this definition, what makes one tool better quality than another tool? So when one says Snap On is higher quality, are they inferring 2.a or 2.b? All of us can judge a tool by the 2.a standard, look shiny. How many people here can judge by the 2.b standard and if they can, what do they use to judge ie.. alloy, stress testing, higher SAE or ASME standards?
Going by the 2.b standards, are any of the hard-line tool brands any different or better than the others?
I do not buy a tool based on how shiny it is, I buy a tool based upon what I need it for and at a value that I feel the tool is worth.
All the thousands of posts, yet not a single person has defined what they view as quality.
The Definition of quality is:
2 a :degree of excellence :grade
the quality of competing air service—Current Biography
b :superiority in kind
merchandise of quality
Using this definition, what makes one tool better quality than another tool? So when one says Snap On is higher quality, are they inferring 2.a or 2.b? All of us can judge a tool by the 2.a standard, look shiny. How many people here can judge by the 2.b standard and if they can, what do they use to judge ie.. alloy, stress testing, higher SAE or ASME standards?
Going by the 2.b standards, are any of the hard-line tool brands any different or better than the others?
I do not buy a tool based on how shiny it is, I buy a tool based upon what I need it for and at a value that I feel the tool is worth.





