ssdave
Banned
......
Last edited:
Good thing you had a plastic gear then! 0.010" isn't much; maybe the gear was already stressed from a previous cut/feed rate issue.
I think some of these mills can be converted to belt drive, which also mitigates the problem.
Good luck with the metal gear.
-No it wasn't stressed, it was a brand new one with less than 15 minutes on it. That's what irritated me so much, I tried to preserve this one and it still exploded. Belt drive is a better way to go, I just decided it couldn't be trusted and bought a larger mill (G0704) with CNC conversion intent. That worked fine for a few months and the motor burned out. I had a regular shop building by then and purchased a used Bridgeport to go with the Mitsui surface grinder, Mitsui-Seiki 4B jig borer, Weiler (German) lathe, and Gorton 375 cutter grinder. I've still got the tiny machines for second operations and G0704 is still awaiting conversion. The tiny machines can be re-worked for better operation/rigidity but almost a waste of time IMO for what has to be done and the machinery needed to do this IMO. Moving full size machinery isn't as difficult (within reason) as most people feel it is if proper techniques and safety precautions are followed. The crappy motors used on cheap Chi-Wan machinery is my biggest gripe, the OEM replacements aren't inexpensive and replacing them with a better made motor often involves needing to make/buy other components. Might as well just get a better made machine for the total cost and trouble involved. Again, that's just my opinion and not looking start a fight or dismiss what works for somebody else.
You should get on that G0704 conversion! I did one a few years back and it was really fun. I converted to belt drive and stepper-driven CNC. That machine isn't super rigid or powerful - some common themes on this thread with smaller machines - but it can certainly do a lot of work with a little patience when run right.
-Would like to but want to first grind the column/base for full contact with each other. Don't know about others but the column looks like it was machined with a hand held angle grinder at the mating area with only a contact patch of about 45%.
I wonder if getting the column trammed perfectly and then using some kind of epoxy based grout would be appropriate here?
You could machine and then scrape the interface to improve surface-contact and then for alignment (not sure if the base-to column interface has an effect on the orthogonal alignments?), but at the end of the day, I don't think it would really help the operation of the machine.