
That’s alarming, although I suppose they exploit G-rated denotations.
All-
I, too, took some time to acclimate to the phrase, and I applaud the conscientious objection and pro-literal-language rationale that’s been offered. I am particularly struck by
Lugz’ testimony that he has not used the phrase. Allow me to admit up front to an occasionally lax memory for precise phraseology, but I read his posts attentively for the thoroughly-vetted content, and I never noticed the absence of “****” outside his observations on how it is used by others:
…the “You ****!”’s. Don’t be alarmed. Suckage is a compliment. But remember, don’t be like the man from Nantucket. Just don’t. You only **** if someone else says you ****...
Goes to show, you can get along here just fine without ever deploying it.

BUT in the interest of statistical pragmatism, I must make the argument for idiomatic convention. Tallying the incidence of complimentary “*****” is complicated enough by the

sad fact that the “Search this Thread“ function discriminates among “****,” “*****”, “sucked,” “sucketh,” “suckage,” “U-****,” and every other iteration of the phrase. The thread host can’t simply run a single search for “****” and catch them all (additionally, “+1” or

are too few characters for the search tool).
SO feel free to use direct, literal language; invent your own complimentary metaphors, verbal or visual; copy&paste emojis





,
emphasis and punctuation!!! galore; employ whatever shorthand circumlocution feels right.
Just know that counting up “*****” is a more objective, democratic, and less prejudiced approach toward
Picker of the Year than

one guy’s opinion.

