To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Buying a new Sub Compact Utility Tractor

Status
Not open for further replies.

Moss

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
148
Location
Ontario Canada
My opinion on pallet forks - they are very useful and I wouldn't even consider not having them at this point. I guess if I had never had them I wouldn't feel that way. I have a fair amount of attachments and forks and landscape rake are probably the ones that have surprised me how much work they have saved me.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
OP
M

Michigan Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
449
Location
Kalamazoo Mi.
Thanks LB-1911. You Covered my situation well. Triumph 1200 We are almost nieghbors the hunting property is in Almena and I live just north of M43 in the Mattawan school district. Mr.zippy NUTTSGT and I have conversed I appreciated his offer but I really don't need the backhoe. Want yes but it would complicate even further my situation.
 

olytdi

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
2,202
Location
Olympia, Washington
I've got a JD 1025R TLB with forks, and a WoodMaxx chipper. I cannot imagine the tractor being a fraction of it's current usefulness without forks. They are used constantly. Once you get thinking about how to use them, the sky is the limit. Pulling a queen size mattress out of one of the bedrooms for disposal a few weeks ago was a piece of cake.

I just started using my forks as an adjustable dog grooming table...so much easier on the back!

IMG_2588.jpg
 

nadogail

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
31,935
Location
Coronado, CA
I saw a Dingo last Saturday, in the back of a pickup that was parked downtown .

It was the first Dingo I have seen and I was impressed.
 

consti2tion

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
509
Location
East Texas
I couldn't imagine having a tractor without pallet forks, even my 1025r is much more useful with them. Also the Grapple is a back saver, I wouldn't be without it now. Would have been fun trying to get that hickory tree off of that Suburban without forks or a grapple.

IMG_6760.jpgIMG_0001 (1).jpgIMG_3991.jpg
 

Renegade1LI

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
4,942
Location
long island ny
I've got a JD 1025R TLB with forks, and a WoodMaxx chipper. I cannot imagine the tractor being a fraction of it's current usefulness without forks. They are used constantly. Once you get thinking about how to use them, the sky is the limit. Pulling a queen size mattress out of one of the bedrooms for disposal a few weeks ago was a piece of cake.

I just started using my forks as an adjustable dog grooming table...so much easier on the back!

IMG_2588.jpg
Which chipper did you get?Looking at getting one.
 

Rc_Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,436
Location
Minnesota
I get it, some people need pallet forks, and use pallet forks a lot but not all of us do.

Some of you guys are going to argue this to the death, but I don’t care I’m done with this thread.
 

Adaylate

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2021
Messages
618
Location
Washington
Michigan Mike,
Any chance your county would allow a storage container ( non-permanent structure) on your remote property. That way you could have a larger tractor.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Robinson1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
834
Location
Kentucky
I’ve read the whole thread

I honestly don’t know what advice to give you.

One major point everyone seems to be missing is a modern SCUT and a Ford 1210 are not really comparable. One is a slightly upscale modern day evolution of a garden tractor. The other was a miniature farm tractor.

Operating weight has a lot to do with tractor performance. More so than horsepower in many cases.

I think a SCUT on a 40 acre property is questionable. But the uses you describe make it seem more plausible. But still far from ideal.

And this is totally my opinion from observation. I really dislike the BX loader design only having one cylinder on the bucket. Just seems like a weak point and a cost cutting measure.

At the end of the day any tractor is better than no tractor.
 

jonesg

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,698
Location
northern Maine/
the farmer next door owns 7 tractors, mostly massey ferguson, his requirements are they have to be diesel and no computers.
he said if they ran on gas he couldn't afford to bring in a harvest.
 

JeepYJ

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
8,942
the farmer next door owns 7 tractors, mostly massey ferguson, his requirements are they have to be diesel and no computers.
he said if they ran on gas he couldn't afford to bring in a harvest.
Gas and diesel cost about the same per kWh of output. Diesel tractor costs more up front. At one time years ago diesel was much less expensive than gasoline.
What kind of farming does this guy do?
I live in the cornbelt where most “real” farmers farm at least 5,000 acres, most considerably more than that. About the only way you can do that is with modern equipment.
 

HoosierMark

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
1,441
Location
Southeast IN
for those people mentioning a grapple, check out the thumbs that mount on your existing bucket. I bought mine from green_machine cantralia IL. No need to switch between bucket and grapple. Getting ready to buy another one now for less then $700.
 

Firebrick43

Well-known member
Joined
May 12, 2015
Messages
14,020
Location
West central Indiana
Do they even make gas "tractors" anymore?
There has been talk about them bringing back gasoline SCUT/CUT/Utility tractors. Modern EFI and lack of emissions plus diesel being more expensive by a $1 to $1.20 more a gallon would make it a smart decision for chore tractors.

It would also reduce cost as they could drop the turbochargers on many of the tractors and have the same power with only minimal if any increase in displacement. Quieter as well.

Kubota makes up to 75 hp gasoline versions of their diesel engines already and have for decades (some models).

The last of the 50hp gasoline tractors in the Nebraska tractor test would use about 1-1.3 gph more fuel during heavy work than their identical but diesel powered model. This was with distributor and updraft carbs and non crossflow heads.

Even without improvements in tech/fuel economy a 50 ish horse tractor has the same fuel operating cost now due to fuel pricing as a comparable diesel
 
Last edited:

JeepYJ

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
8,942
Kubota makes up to 75 hp gasoline versions of their diesel engines already and have for decades (some models).
Deere used liquid cooled Yanmar 3 cylinder gasoline engines based on the Diesel engine in a 322 garden tractor in the 1980s. Those were very nice running little tractors and reasonably good on fuel.
 

nerraw117

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
298
Location
Concord, NC
for those people mentioning a grapple, check out the thumbs that mount on your existing bucket. I bought mine from green_machine cantralia IL. No need to switch between bucket and grapple. Getting ready to buy another one now for less then $700.
How do you like that one? I couldn't find a ton of information on that particular one.
 

ericm

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2016
Messages
1,963
Location
Southern Oregon
There has been talk about them bringing back gasoline SCUT/CUT/Utility tractors. Modern EFI and lack of emissions plus diesel being more expensive by a $1 to $1.20 more a gallon would make it a smart decision for chore tractors.
A 3 cylinder slice of a GM 5.3 LS engine would be just under 2 liters and make about 110hp. Of course it would need to be tuned differently for tractor use, to operate at lower rpms so it run like engines people are already used to, and to have torque rise. But you could give away a lot of that 110hp and still do pretty well. (My 2.1 liter Branson makes 37hp, so it's really understressed).

Here's a 3.6 liter four industrial engine making 104hp (probably for the turbo gas version): https://originengines.com/origin-engines-3-6l/

Oh yea: I have a grapple and forks for my tractor. The grapple is the implement on there most of the time. I put the forks on to move firewood totes or pallets, that's about it. For brush and logs the grapple is more useful.
 

jonesg

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,698
Location
northern Maine/
So every tractor and his combine are over 20 years old?
i'd say his tractors are 40 yrs and older .... at least,
he says he can run all day on a can of diesel.
farmers have complained about right to repair for a while now, imagine if you had to take your car to the dealership for every little repair, they'd love that.
 

jonesg

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,698
Location
northern Maine/
Gas and diesel cost about the same per kWh of output. Diesel tractor costs more up front. At one time years ago diesel was much less expensive than gasoline.
What kind of farming does this guy do?
I live in the cornbelt where most “real” farmers farm at least 5,000 acres, most considerably more than that. About the only way you can do that is with modern equipment.
old diesel tractors are cheap here, i might get one myself, they very useful.
 

jmdirk

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2015
Messages
702
We don’t need anything. I want a tractor, we live on 6-1/2 heavily wooded acres, always picking up brush piles. Spent the last two days using the grapple to move logs from a few trees we cut down that were dead, neighbor and I went in together and rented a lift to cut them down as they were close to our houses.

Most of my tractor hours are grapple and moving snow, I plow with a side by side but move the piles with the tractor.

I’m just saying, not everyone needs pallet forks even though some think everyone should have them.

I certainly didn't need mine either. Spent a good 10 years doing everything with a wheelbarrow and a lawn tractor. The BX cut down my grass cutting time by probably a good 30-40 minutes. Yes, a zero turn would have been faster. But also cut down my snow clearing time by at least 50%, especially if it's a heavy snow or I've been away over the holidays to come home to a hellish frozen lasagna consisting of various layers of snow and ice.

I could have continued to do everything the way I used to. Hell I could have switched a reel mower and a snow shovel.

But I will say I've never regretted buying my tractor.
 

Firebrick43

Well-known member
Joined
May 12, 2015
Messages
14,020
Location
West central Indiana
i'd say his tractors are 40 yrs and older .... at least,
he says he can run all day on a can of diesel.
farmers have complained about right to repair for a while now, imagine if you had to take your car to the dealership for every little repair, they'd love that.
A five gallon can of diesel might let you idle all day, certainly not do any work all day.

As far as right to repair, it’s not every little repair. It was things that required hooking a lap top up to the tractor.

Jd Deere has made available the software now to farmers, it’s just had the part to reprogram the engine taken out so farmers can’t shut off or delete emissions equipment.
 

JeepYJ

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
8,942
i'd say his tractors are 40 yrs and older .... at least,
he says he can run all day on a can of diesel.
farmers have complained about right to repair for a while now, imagine if you had to take your car to the dealership for every little repair, they'd love that.
40 years old puts you back to the mid 1980s. A real farm tractor from that era is going to burn through some diesel when doing serious work.
A 25hp CUT will burn about 1 gallon per hour if it’s getting worked really hard.
I guess the size of his diesel can and what he considers “all day” would come into play too.
Right To Repair is an overblown issue. All the manufacturers have similar programming.
 

Rkcubed

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
158
Location
Missouri
To me HP isn’t as important as weight. I went from a SC to a Kubota L4330. The weight matters a lot in moving stuff around with the loader. It also helps when using a brushhog, tiller, boom pole, post hole digger, and any other attachment. One advantage of weight is you don’t really work the tractor as hard. You will really like a bigger tractor for what you are trying to accomplish.
 
Last edited:

ATC

Well-known member
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
8,268
Location
VA
To me HP isn’t as important as weight. I went from a SC to a Kubota L4330. The weight matters a lot in moving stuff around with the loader. It also helps when using a brushhog, tiller, boom pole, post hole digger, and any other attachment. One advantage of weight is you don’t really work the tractor as hard. You will really like a bigger tractor for what you are trying to accomplish.
Weight also allows for greater lifting capacities as well (if the cylinders/loader will allow of course).

My skid steer weighs just under 8k, and can lift 4500. The same 75hp engine in a 12k machine will do a good bit over 6000#.
 

jonesg

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,698
Location
northern Maine/
40 years old puts you back to the mid 1980s. A real farm tractor from that era is going to burn through some diesel when doing serious work.
A 25hp CUT will burn about 1 gallon per hour if it’s getting worked really hard.
I guess the size of his diesel can and what he considers “all day” would come into play too.
Right To Repair is an overblown issue. All the manufacturers have similar programming.
I can ask him for a copy of the title if you need it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom