Wow, it seems like you are losing a lot of displacement to re-expansion because it's so over-square. Would a production version have a longer stroke?This is one of my prototype compressors. Powered by a 115V 2HP 1725 RPM motor. Displacement is 15.9 CFM. 1st stage bore is 4.5" and 2nd stage is 2.75". Stroke is 1".
Does not use a tank check valve. Uses a custom air operated gate valve instead. It has a pressure operated inlet restrictor. Tank fill time calculations show a actual SCFM of around 12. Maximum pressure reached 240PSI.
I believe re-expansion is not a significant factor because there is very little unswept volume and because the peak cylinder pressure is low due to the unrestricted flow path to the tank.Wow, it seems like you are losing a lot of displacement to re-expansion because it's so over-square. Would a production version have a longer stroke?
Well, you’re losing ~25% of your displacement to something. What else could it be?I believe re-expansion is not a significant factor because there is very little unswept volume and because the peak cylinder pressure is low due to the unrestricted flow path to the tank.
Perhaps it's partially due to inlet flow restriction. On the other hand if I am indeed getting close to 6 SCFM/HP that in itself is pretty amazing don't you think?Well, you’re losing ~25% of your displacement to something. What else could it be?









That is really good, but did measure the true input power for that calculation, or is that using the nameplate HP?Perhaps it's partially due to inlet flow restriction. On the other hand if I am indeed getting close to 6 SCFM/HP that in itself is pretty amazing don't you think?
Draws an average of 17 amps at 117V. Name plate reads 2HP.That is really good, but did measure the true input power for that calculation, or is that using the nameplate HP?
Draws an average of 17 amps at 117V. Name plate reads 2HP.
So 17 A at 120 V is only about 1 horsepower, meaning you are doing even better than you think. Reconsidering the ratio of free air to displacement I think your result is consistent with what a recip should do.Correction:
I previously stated that the displacement of my compressor was 15.9 but I forgot to subtract the first stage piston rod area since the first stage pumps during the in stroke.. The correct displacement is 14.68 CFM.
It would be impossible for me to be doing better than I think because I already think my compressor is more efficient than anything I am aware of. I don't know of any reciprocating compressor that can pump more than 4 SCFM per horsepower at these pressures. 3 and a half is pretty typical.So 17 A at 120 V is only about 1 horsepower, meaning you are doing even better than you think. Reconsidering the ratio of free air to displacement I think your result is consistent with what a recip should do.
Any info on the governor setup on the pump sheave? I was sitting here thinking perhaps it was pre-electric motor driven to keep the pump from overspeeding? Very interesting for sure. I would like to know how exactly it functions.
Interesting question. I have no idea if it's an unloader, centrifugal clutch or......?? Seems like I read it could be an unloader. I've seen pics of these set up just like this, so I think factory setup. I haven't touched it since I got it several weeks ago. It was listed locally at $200, then $100. I inquired and seller said 'come get it for $50 or I'm scrapping it'. When I found out it was 0.6 miles from me, I went and saved it. I plan on washing off the dirt soon as it gets warmer. Will report back on function of the flywheel springs/weights.Any info on the governor setup on the pump sheave? I was sitting here thinking perhaps it was pre-electric motor driven to keep the pump from overspeeding? Very interesting for sure. I would like to know how exactly it functions.
