Uh...what?!? Should be possible to put it on some kind of switch. Still, to your point, that's super ghetto.The drill unit VFD has no power diconnect. They suggest unplugging when not in use. This is a very expensive machine. Unplugging is just ********.
youre taking me back...and I recognize that you didn't ask for feedback but...The Powermax 85 will machine pierce 5/8" according to their specs. Guys are doing much thicker. It will definitely edge cut 1". I'll do a little bit of 1" stuff for the shop here and there. I wanted to be able to run 1/2" plate without issue. This should do the trick. My bigger issue with thicker plate is material handling. I'll need a pallet stacker and probably a forklift. For the heavy stuff I'll most likely stick to working with 4x4 chunks.
Ghetto is exactly what I thought when I discovered the oversight. I will be installing a main power disconnect that switches the 120v and 240v (spindle) circuits, like it should have been from the factory. These sort of details.. so easy to get it right.Uh...what?!? Should be possible to put it on some kind of switch. Still, to your point, that's super ghetto.
Your numbers are a little different than what I found feasible when I bought my machine. The 85 is the largest power source Hypertherm offers that will run on single phase supply. The 105, 125 and up require 3 phase power. I went with double.. ie: the 85 is rated to pierce 5/8 and I'll be doing most of my stuff at 5/16 and thinner. I do see guys getting amazing cut quality on thick steels with edge starting and going quite slow. I believe this is because of some aspect of Hypertherms modern tech in the power source. To pierce 1.25" you are in their high definition systems and are spending six figures. This was the most machine I could get, in the class I was hitting in.youre taking me back...and I recognize that you didn't ask for feedback but...
My .02 on the plasma cutter...go big, way big. Here's why: There's 2 ratings a machine has. (1) is pierce thickness and(2) is cutting from the edge/sever. For CNC, sever isn't a rating you can leverage. The stream will struggle to get through the material. What you'll see is the entry point on top will be way ahead of the exit point at the bottom. Effectively, the stream is bent or trailing. As a result, corners, arcs, and holes will all be out of square. Same goes for the pierce but just a bit different. The pierce is the effort the machine makes getting through the material. On the way though, a weaker machine will have a stream that's actually fighting it's way through adn sometimes it won't exit exactly below the entry point (effectively bending as well). The harder it is to pierce, the longer you'll need to set the move delay and the more difficult it will be to remove the dross...
Get the biggest machine you can buy. If you wanna cut 1", you need something much bigger. I cut 1/4 most frequently and if I had to do it all over again, I'd get a machine that could pierce 1" bare min and maybe even upgrade to 1 1/4.
also...you will always find a reason to cut something larger than you plan. If you plan 1", you'll find a reason to cut 1 1/4. I do think the $5k more is probably worth the upgrade in this case. Though it doesn't seem like it, the plasma is the heart of the machine.
I’m certain my knowledge of cutting systems is outdated. It’s been years. I may also be on size machine off too. At the time I coding afford the bigger machines, life constraints and all. To show how dated my first-hand experience is, I had (and still have) a Hypertherm Powermax 800. Mine could pierce 1/2" all day long and not poorly. It could edge cut thicker. Yes, while going very slow, it could make very nice cuts in those thicker materials. The caveat however, is that the slower it moves, the more challenging the dross can be to remove. I thought there was 2 models larger than mine but you're right, they didn't have the capacity I'm remembering. There was a 5/8" and then one bigger which I'm now guessing was more like 7/8"...so yeah, no 1 1/4. Now there's a 125...probably is 3 phase. Guess I was really saying, "Get 3 Phase".Your numbers are a little different than what I found feasible when I bought my machine. The 85 is the largest power source Hypertherm offers that will run on single phase supply. The 105, 125 and up require 3 phase power. I went with double.. ie: the 85 is rated to pierce 5/8 and I'll be doing most of my stuff at 5/16 and thinner. I do see guys getting amazing cut quality on thick steels with edge starting and going quite slow. I believe this is because of some aspect of Hypertherms modern tech in the power source. To pierce 1.25" you are in their high definition systems and are spending six figures. This was the most machine I could get, in the class I was hitting in.
I really appreciate you sharing your thoughts, advice, and experience. Thank you!
I forgot about you not having 3Phase. I did have it in my shop but mine was 440 (or whatever the big *** voltage it was). At the time I felt silly because running the bigger boy machines was totally possible in my shop but my budget prevented it. Still did some nice stuff with that 800. It still is a good machine. Could hook it up as is today if I had a table.I was thinking along the same lines when I bought this machine.. I picked up some scrap steel, aluminum, and stainless today to do some test cuts on when I get temp power ran and the table watered up.
I've looked far into getting three phase service at the shop. The deal breaker for me is they won't do 3 phase 240, even though my last shop in town had exactly that. They only offer 208 Y. That *****. Your conductors all go up a size. At some point, I will either pull in a second service at 400a single phase, or I'll up my existing to 400a.



Listening to a transformer hum is pure torture to me. If I was a spy and you put me in a room with a humming transformer, I would tell you anything you wanted to know. UGH!I don’t have room for GIS switchgear and I don’t want to listen to a transformer hum because it doesn’t know the words!





I made some progress yesterday and an email from tech support may have me dialed in on cutting arcs holes.

When I ran my table for years I realized that the smaller holes wouldn't have the lead-in because the arc was too large and the software would eliminate it as a result.Lead ins should start as close to the center of the hole as possible(your lead ins on this example are very close to the perimeter and can potentially deform the hole), and a lot of people ditch the lead out on small holes;
I agree, it can be good to have a lead in arc that is close to tangent when it comes in contact with the profile of the hole. I'm not sure what software you used to program, but in Fusion the lead in length, arc radius, and angle is adjustable so you can really fine tune where the pierce begins. In my experience, having a pierce and lead in beginning so close to the cut profile can blow out the profile and/or overheat the hole (diameter dependent) so that by the time the cut profile is closed, there is a defect from the material being so hot.When I ran my table for years I realized that the smaller holes wouldn't have the lead-in because the arc was too large and the software would eliminate it as a result.
The arc of the lead in is what allows the cut to naturally roll into the interior or exterior of the part without creating a disruptive entry which is also important.
the software I used (it's been years ago) also made those parameters configurable. I never had and/or observed an issue of work hardening by the plasma cutting process. The precision of bolt-sized holes wasn't acceptable and we shifted to punching everything.I agree, it can be good to have a lead in arc that is close to tangent when it comes in contact with the profile of the hole. I'm not sure what software you used to program, but in Fusion the lead in length, arc radius, and angle is adjustable so you can really fine tune where the pierce begins. In my experience, having a pierce and lead in beginning so close to the cut profile can blow out the profile and/or overheat the hole (diameter dependent) so that by the time the cut profile is closed, there is a defect from the material being so hot.
Sorry, by overheating producing a defect I didn't mean metallurgically, I meant it can produce an irregularity in the hole profile. Sorry for hijacking the thread a little bit here!the software I used (it's been years ago) also made those parameters configurable. I never had and/or observed an issue of work hardening by the plasma cutting process. The precision of bolt-sized holes wasn't acceptable and we shifted to punching everything.
Ah, that makes more sense!Sorry, by overheating producing a defect I didn't mean metallurgically, I meant it can produce an irregularity in the hole profile. Sorry for hijacking the thread a little bit here!










Good! Keep posting and we'll keep reading.Thanks for stopping by again! I'm glad you guys enjoy it. I enjoy posting this stuff here.

I ran a similar filter if not the same filter on an Arclight plasma cutter table. It makes a noticeable difference in cut quality. I had just put in new consumables and was still getting not optimal cuts and it was just needing a new filter. I learned to keep a couple on hand. Also for perspective, this was on a system with auto water drains, a chiller, dryers, and in a dry climate. Dry air makes more of a difference than you would ever expect.













I ran a similar filter if not the same filter on an Arclight plasma cutter table. It makes a noticeable difference in cut quality. I had just put in new consumables and was still getting not optimal cuts and it was just needing a new filter. I learned to keep a couple on hand. Also for perspective, this was on a system with auto water drains, a chiller, dryers, and in a dry climate. Dry air makes more of a difference than you would ever expect.
Congratulations, on the new machine. It seems like you are making some progress.
I saw your post about the sharpie holder and I think you would appreciate this if you haven't come across it yet.
How does posting work out of Fusion? I understand how it works for a traditional mill, but the plasma is a different animal especially with the additional heads and the fact that the plasma may have a different tip set up. I assume the different tools just have a positional offset, but I am curious how they are triggered.Thank you! I have the Motor Guard filters on the laser and in my finish room. They are a great final element. The air supply is as dry as I'm going to be able to achieve - two coalescing filters, refrigerated dryer, and desiccant upstream of the Motor Guard.
That's a slick sharpie mount! I believe Shop Sabre's pen mount is similar. I couldn't add it with the scribe and drill. They said too wide of a Z axis for the table width. The plate marker fills as similar role to his pen.
I'm having fun with the machine and feeling like I'm getting somewhere. Being able to post gcode from Fusion for all three processes in one file makes all the difference.
Thanks again for checking out my shop and taking the time to comment.

Thanks, Jay! He said she was happy with it. Shop has evolved quite a lot. I’m enjoying the process. Thank you for following my journey.You’ve really upped your game with the recent shop acquisitions! That table turned out nice!
Jay
It’s a process for sure. I’m happy to have the plasma making a usable part. Thank you for stopping by!Looks like the new toys are coming right along!