I'm using 100watt (equivalent) daylight CFL's (1600 Lumens, 6500K with a life of 8000hours). When I originally built my shop (about 15 years ago), I installed 100watt incandesent bulbs. About 10 years ago, I began replacing the incadesents with the CFL's. Would it be/should I replace the CFL's with a replacement LED bulbs?... If I'm stepping on toes (highjacking) here, feel free to delete this post. ...Oh, my shop is 24ft. x 40ft. with 10ft ceiling and a 6ft. by 20ft. bump out with a 8ft. ceiling.
Doug
No need to have the post deleted, and you sure aren't hijacking. I've learned a lot from the input and questions that have been asked in this thread from everyone.
Platonic Solid,
To answer your questions. 1) two 60watt (equivalent) bulbs in the rear bump out and twenty eight 100watt (equivalent) bulbs in the main shop area, all CFL's. ...2) the layout has been that way for about 15 years, and I'm quite used to it that way. That said, I'd be willing to make SOME (as in maybe minor) changes if it meant better all around lighting. ...3) lumen output? I never even thought about that with the incandescent, and when I heard about the incandescent going bye-bye, I began installing the equivalent CFL's. ...4) lamp life wasn't/isn't too bad IMHO. At this time, I'm seeing more bulb burnout now than I did before. ...5) warm-up time doesn't seem to take long at all. After all these years I may be just used ti it. ...6) electricity usage is of more concern when running the AC! My dad used to say,"if you have to ask how much it will cost, you can't afford it! LOL! ... The only problem I have with my lighting is the bright slightly blue tint. After doing sheet metal layout for a period of time, I find I start squinting my eyes! I hope this helps! ...Oh, maybe I should add that in six months I'll, be seventy years old and all my lighting problems may be my age! LOL!
Doug
When I was working, our shop got on a big kick about energy savings, and being in an older shop, we still had a lot of ceiling mounted porcelain fixtures. We went from incandescent bulbs to CFL's for the energy savings we would get. BUT.....we were losing money big time because the lamps would go bad. The CFL's get rather hot, not only the base of the lamp, but the lamp itself. Inside the base is a circuit board. I believe that mounting the CFL's upside down in the fixtures created enough heat to damage the circuit board components. I also noticed on some that the silicone used to secure the lamp to the base, would actually get hot enough to let the lamp come loose in the base. This never happened when a CFL was mounted in something like a table lamp where the CFL was in the upward position. But when it is mounted upside down, we were seeing high failure rates.
Along the same lines of the CFL failures.......when we switched over to more energy efficient fluorescent lights, the company that did the changeover used the existing fluorescent light fixtures, but added in all new energy efficient ballast. We were starting to experience high failure rates of the ballast. Our toolroom was in a basement. Back when the building was build, there were concrete beams used for our ceiling and upstairs floor. This created a gridwork where our fluorescents were mounted up in. I think the excess heat inside of the pockets cause premature failure of the ballast. The reason I say that is that where we had a flat ceiling in an open area, those fluorescent fixtures never failed.
Anyways......for anyone on here that has a question, hijack away. I'm learning more now than I ever knew about lighting, and thanks to all for your input.

