To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Plomb tool picture thread - show your stuff!

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
After seeing Roy’s cool finds, the water pump pliers I found at yesterday’s estate sale were just sort of a letdown.
They aren’t Name-Nurl so I wonder when they were made?IMG_5936.jpeg
IMG_5937.jpeg-Don
That almost looks like the 241 light duty style. What do the handle grips look like?
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,487
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
The ratchets were female drive, so why not?
'Zackly. And they had plenty of company. Early detachable socket wrench drive tool sets I have with male drive tangs include Charles Miller, Mossberg, Syracuse, Chicago Mfging and Distributing, Eastern Machine Screw, Spezial Werkzeuge Fabrik (imports), and - less exotically, more akin to Plomb - Herbrand! The approach, which I have called more natural than female drive openings in similar conversations in the past here, dates back to the late 1800s with primitive Greene Tweed ratchet attachments for railroad and bridge building industries.
 

Provincial

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
6,855
Location
Near Salem, OR
I've been too busy to go through and post much lately. Here are some things that I've had for a while. They came from estate sales.

Plomb 1.jpg
1/2 drive and 3/8 drive socket rails
Double L wrench, but it is 1/2 x 5/8, which is non-standard
DOE LA obstruction wrench, which would be a 1/2 x 9/16 N89, but doesn't have the part number

Plomb 2.jpg
Plomb 3.jpg
Plomb 4.jpg
The L is pretty beat up, with no legible markings except the "PLOMB". There is a D that appears to be part of an owner's mark. I haven't found an L in a catalog that has different openings on the same wrench.
 

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
I've been too busy to go through and post much lately. Here are some things that I've had for a while. They came from estate sales.

Plomb 1.jpg
1/2 drive and 3/8 drive socket rails
Double L wrench, but it is 1/2 x 5/8, which is non-standard
DOE LA obstruction wrench, which would be a 1/2 x 9/16 N89, but doesn't have the part number

Plomb 2.jpg
Plomb 3.jpg
Plomb 4.jpg
The L is pretty beat up, with no legible markings except the "PLOMB". There is a D that appears to be part of an owner's mark. I haven't found an L in a catalog that has different openings on the same wrench.
Nice! I dig through my early catalogs and every ell wrench has the same sockets sizes on each end. Good stuff
 

Smokeshow69

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
8,366
Location
Pacific Northwest
I've been too busy to go through and post much lately. Here are some things that I've had for a while. They came from estate sales.

Plomb 1.jpg
1/2 drive and 3/8 drive socket rails
Double L wrench, but it is 1/2 x 5/8, which is non-standard
DOE LA obstruction wrench, which would be a 1/2 x 9/16 N89, but doesn't have the part number

Plomb 2.jpg
Plomb 3.jpg
Plomb 4.jpg
The L is pretty beat up, with no legible markings except the "PLOMB". There is a D that appears to be part of an owner's mark. I haven't found an L in a catalog that has different openings on the same wrench.
Very nice find on the socket rails!
 

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
How about a 1929 Round O Dodge Six Water Pump Wrench. For a water pump wrench this is thick! I had to look up what a Dodge Six was.
20260113_160738.jpg20260113_160745.jpgScreenshot_20260113-180120_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20260113-203312_Chrome.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260113-180120_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20260113-180120_Drive.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 3
  • 20260113_160745.jpg
    20260113_160745.jpg
    828.2 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,500
Location
Northern California
That almost looks like the 241 light duty style. What do the handle grips look like?

They are smooth other than a previous owners grind marks.
-Don
Here are some pictures of the water pump pliers including the handles. IMG_6017.jpegIMG_6015.jpegIMG_6016.jpegIMG_6018.jpeg
BK, Roy is ramping up his Plomb collecting. He is currently one of the larger collectors and has recently been finding some rare and cool pieces.
-Don
 

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
Here are some pictures of the water pump pliers including the handles. IMG_6017.jpegIMG_6015.jpegIMG_6016.jpegIMG_6018.jpeg
BK, Roy is ramping up his Plomb collecting. He is currently one of the larger collectors and has recently been finding some rare and cool pieces.
-Don
Interesting. I will have to check mine now. They do not have the JP Danielson grips so they may be pre acquisition.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

bullrocky

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2023
Messages
15
hello all, trying to confirm, or debunk the grind off on this 5460 proto extension. it feels smooth, like what you would expect if it were plated after the grind, nothing rough at all about it, no chipping, rust, discoloration, or sharp edges or ridges. also it looks pretty uniform and no larger than it has to be. i know it's hard to tell from a picture, but hoping someone with more plomb/proto experience than i have can help. i bought it at an estate sale because it said Los Angeles, didn't even notice the grind mark till the next day.

thank you!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260110_105515009.jpg
    IMG_20260110_105515009.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 27
  • IMG_20260110_130539815.jpg
    IMG_20260110_130539815.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 25
  • IMG_20260110_132534816.jpg
    IMG_20260110_132534816.jpg
    51.8 KB · Views: 25
  • IMG_20260111_075835893.jpg
    IMG_20260111_075835893.jpg
    149.6 KB · Views: 26

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
hello all, trying to confirm, or debunk the grind off on this 5460 proto extension. it feels smooth, like what you would expect if it were plated after the grind, nothing rough at all about it, no chipping, rust, discoloration, or sharp edges or ridges. also it looks pretty uniform and no larger than it has to be. i know it's hard to tell from a picture, but hoping someone with more plomb/proto experience than i have can help. i bought it at an estate sale because it said Los Angeles, didn't even notice the grind mark till the next day.

thank you!
What is theory you are trying to prove or debunk with the grind off?
 

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
that it was caught in pre production during the lawsuit and that the plomb name was ground off before plating
Understood. Most grind off tools were factory seconds vs lawsuit tools. Plomb stamping would be where the Proto is on that extension. I have only 1 example of a true lawsuit grind off tools shown here with a grind off and restamp of this 3061 pebble wrench.
Either way it's a nice extension. Those short ones can be hard to find! Thanks for posting.
20260116_114439.jpg20260116_114442.jpg
 

bullrocky

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2023
Messages
15
Understood. Most grind off tools were factory seconds vs lawsuit tools. Plomb stamping would be where the Proto is on that extension. I have only 1 example of a true lawsuit grind off tools shown here with a grind off and restamp of this 3061 pebble wrench.
Either way it's a nice extension. Those short ones can be hard to find! Thanks for posting.
20260116_114439.jpg20260116_114442.jpg
thanks for the help!, thats an awesome wrench!
 

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,500
Location
Northern California
I found an unusual Plomb adjustable wrench at yesterday’s estate sale. It has a square jaw like wrenches sourced from Utica or those made in the former Danielson factory but is missing features of both of those manufacturers. Danielson style adjustables have broached hanging holes along with date codes. Utica sourced wrenches have raised areas on the throat of the wrenches. This one is missing all of the above features. Is this one of the rare Diamond sourced wrenches? If so, the square jaws are unexpected. IMG_6091.jpegIMG_6092.jpegIMG_6094.jpegIMG_6095.jpeg
Utica sourced above Danielson styles adjustables.IMG_2397.jpeg
-Don
 
Last edited:

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
I found an unusual Plomb adjustable wrench at yesterday’s estate sale. It has a square jaw like wrenches sourced from Utica or those made in the former Danielson factory but is missing features of both of those manufacturers. Danielson style adjustables have broached hanging holes along with date codes. Utica sourced wrenches have raised areas on the throat of the wrenches. This one is missing all of the above features. Is this one of the rare Diamond sourced wrenches? If so, the square jaws are unexpected. IMG_6091.jpegIMG_6092.jpegIMG_6094.jpegIMG_6095.jpeg
Utica sourced above Danielson styles adjustables.IMG_2397.jpeg
-Don
That is a Utica "Smooth Panel" variant. Utica has 3 variants that I know of.
Obround Logo (like the top one you have pictured)
Web Panel
Smooth Panel
 

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,500
Location
Northern California
Thanks Roy, I have a 12” smooth panel Utica made adjustable but it has a reinforced hanging hole which this one doesn’t have. I wonder when both variants were made?IMG_1241.jpeg
Utica and Plomb.IMG_3079.jpegIMG_3080.jpeg
-Don
 
Last edited:

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
Thanks Roy, I have a 12” smooth panel Utica made adjustable but it has a reinforced hanging hole which this one doesn’t have. I wonder when both variants were made?IMG_1241.jpeg
Utica and Plomb.IMG_3079.jpegIMG_3080.jpeg
-Don
Hi Don,
I have not looked that close. Of my 4 I have 1 with the reinforced broach hole and 3 without. Maybe it was a mid model change?
20260117_093723.jpg
 

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,500
Location
Northern California
Hi Don,
I have not looked that close. Of my 4 I have 1 with the reinforced broach hole and 3 without. Maybe it was a mid model change?
20260117_093723.jpg
It could have been. That would have been a pretty short window, late war to 1946, right before the Danielson purchase. I cleaned mine up yesterday. It’s in surprisingly good condition. IMG_6128.jpegIMG_6129.jpegIMG_6126.jpegIMG_6127.jpeg
-Don
 

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
It could have been. That would have been a pretty short window, late war to 1946, right before the Danielson purchase. I cleaned mine up yesterday. It’s in surprisingly good condition. IMG_6128.jpegIMG_6129.jpegIMG_6126.jpegIMG_6127.jpeg
-Don
Looks good! If I remember correctly I think Plomb started offer adjustables around 1938 and started with the obround Logo.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,487
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Fellow Plombers,

@GemState10ER PM'ed me to ask about an interesting DOE he found with 1-1/4" x 1-5/8" openings. I gave him my thoughts and recommended he post it on the Plomb thread. Relatively new to GJ, and still learning how to navigate, he must've searched for 'Plomb' and ended up posting it here...

I am moving his photos for him. See below.

My thoughts were...

I can't find a better explanation that Plomb used the 3061 wrench dies/molds to make the same basic wrench, dimensionally, but then milled and finished the 1-7/16" open end to 1-5/8" instead, ground off the "7/16" forged-in die marking, and replaced that by stamping the much smaller "5/8" marking right over the splotched steel. They also stamped in an "S". Making it a 3061 S (for Special). Because it had a Pebble panel, the grinding is much more obvious, and there was no way to even try to make it less noticeable.

If that end wasn't milled and finished so cleanly, stamped with the new size so neatly, and also didn't have the "S", I might suspect a PO or shop.

I have a WF-8 "S" (1/4-inch drive version) but I couldn't recall if we had seen any other Specials before, let alone a big *** modified DOE, in the Pebble or any other era, and I suggested that @r_olson_06 and perhaps others might know.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3799.jpeg
    IMG_3799.jpeg
    844.7 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_3801.jpeg
    IMG_3801.jpeg
    761 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_3800.jpeg
    IMG_3800.jpeg
    725 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_3802.jpeg
    IMG_3802.jpeg
    803.2 KB · Views: 12

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
Fellow Plombers,

@GemState10ER PM'ed me to ask about an interesting 3061 he found. I gave him my thoughts and recommended he post it on the Plomb thread. Relatively new to GJ, and still learning how to navigate, he must've searched for 'Plomb' and ended up posting it here...

I am moving his photos for him. See below.

My thoughts were...

I can't find a better explanation that Plomb used the 3061 wrench dies/molds to make the same basic wrench, dimensionally, but then milled and finished the 1-7/16" open end to 1-5/8" instead, ground off the "7/16" forged-in die marking, and replaced that by stamping the much smaller "5/8" marking right over the splotched steel. They also stamped in an "S". Making it a 3061 S (for Special). Because it had a Pebble panel, the grinding is much more obvious, and there was no way to even try to make it less noticeable.

I have a WF-8 "S" (1/4-inch drive version) but I couldn't recall if we had seen any other Specials before, let alone a big *** modified DOE, in the Pebble or any other era, and I suggested that @r_olson_06 and perhaps others might know.
That one is sort of new for me. The reason it is sort of new is previous to the pebble era they did run an "S" line of DOEs that has standard part number with a -s for example 3061-S. They designated non standard size combinations. These seem to be more previlant around 1940 and 1941 based on date codes. Now there is something to be said about the 3061 pebble. Coincidentally I have a 3061 was that was a grind off and restamped to Proto LA with about the same stamping size as above. One could theorize that they may have had a larger stock of the 3061s and that is maybe why this one was modified.
Lastly I am not sure why they just didn't create different part numbers for these non standard size combinations. I cannot remember who I was talking with on the thread but one theory is they started with that part number forge die before making the modification. All theory right now.
 

r_olson_06

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
4,076
Location
SD
Fellow Plombers,

@GemState10ER PM'ed me to ask about an interesting 3061 he found. I gave him my thoughts and recommended he post it on the Plomb thread. Relatively new to GJ, and still learning how to navigate, he must've searched for 'Plomb' and ended up posting it here...

I am moving his photos for him. See below.

My thoughts were...

I can't find a better explanation that Plomb used the 3061 wrench dies/molds to make the same basic wrench, dimensionally, but then milled and finished the 1-7/16" open end to 1-5/8" instead, ground off the "7/16" forged-in die marking, and replaced that by stamping the much smaller "5/8" marking right over the splotched steel. They also stamped in an "S". Making it a 3061 S (for Special). Because it had a Pebble panel, the grinding is much more obvious, and there was no way to even try to make it less noticeable.

I have a WF-8 "S" (1/4-inch drive version) but I couldn't recall if we had seen any other Specials before, let alone a big *** modified DOE, in the Pebble or any other era, and I suggested that @r_olson_06 and perhaps others might know.
That one is sort of new for me. The reason it is sort of new is previous to the pebble era they did run an "S" line of DOEs that has standard part number with a -s for example 3061-S. They designated non standard size combinations. These seem to be more previlant around 1940 and 1941 based on date codes. Now there is something to be said about the 3061 pebble. Coincidentally I have a 3061 was that was a grind off and restamped to Proto LA with about the same stamping size as above. One could theorize that they may have had a larger stock of the 3061s and that is maybe why this one was modified.
Lastly I am not sure why they just didn't create different part numbers for these non standard size combinations. I cannot remember who I was talking with on the thread but one theory is they started with that part number forge die before making the modification. All theory
That one is sort of new for me. The reason it is sort of new is previous to the pebble era they did run an "S" line of DOEs that has standard part number with a -s for example 3061-S. They designated non standard size combinations. These seem to be more previlant around 1940 and 1941 based on date codes. Now there is something to be said about the 3061 pebble. Coincidentally I have a 3061 was that was a grind off and restamped to Proto LA with about the same stamping size as above. One could theorize that they may have had a larger stock of the 3061s and that is maybe why this one was modified.
Lastly I am not sure why they just didn't create different part numbers for these non standard size combinations. I cannot remember who I was talking with on the thread but one theory is they started with that part number forge die before making the modification. All theory right now.
Here is my list of 30XX-S
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260118-125056_Sheets.jpg
    Screenshot_20260118-125056_Sheets.jpg
    506.9 KB · Views: 11
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom