How has this
NAPA compressor performed?
I found the
Quincy but came across the NAPA one for $580, which has the same CFM output, and is $170 cheaper than the Quincy ($750). There's hardly any information on NAPA's site on this compressor. The Quincy's description shows it has a cast iron cylinder and aluminum head. It claims the pump has a 10k hour life span. I'm not sure I believe 10k hours is realistic though...
Does the NAPA have a cast iron cylinder, etc. and rated for 10k hour life span like the Quincy? If it's the same unit, I don't see the benefit of buying a Quincy for $170 more. I tend to like buying large/heavy items locally for warranty issues as well. I have a local NAPA, but the Quincy I'd have to buy through an online site.
I'm looking at getting as much CFM in a portable compressor. The highest I've found is 6-6.2 cfm in the larger tank sizes like 26-30 gallons. I'd like a 60 gallon unit, specifically the Quincy QT-54, but don't really have the room at the moment for one. It's also hard to justify a $2k compressor at the moment where most of my tools are battery powered.
I was looking at a
Husky 30 gallon 175 psi compressor that I can buy locally, which is rated to 175 psi and has a larger 30 gallon tank. However, it has 6.2 cfm instead of the Quincy/Napa's 7.4 cfm. Has the NAPA's 135psi tank max pressure worked okay? Does it put out the rated 7.4 cfm?
I'm not needing a compressor for production; just for fixing my cars when they have problems, and do some occasional metal working as a hobby. Most of my automotive tools I use are battery powered, but I do use an air hammer. I use air to blow stuff off too. My 4 gallon compressor is supposedly rated for ~4cfm but it's under powered for what I've been using it for, and I wait on it a lot when using air tools for a repair. I've gotten by, but I'm abusing it, as it's really meant for a nail gun.
I'm looking into possibly getting a plasma cutter at some point in the future that specs 6 cfm at 90psi for full cut capacity (hence, looking at a high cfm portable compressor), but mostly would be cutting thinner material, so the requirement would likely be more like 4.5 cfm at 90 psi.
The Husky's higher 175 psi pressure rating and larger tank volume look appealing, but it seems through reading that CFM is more important, and hence, the 7.4 cfm rating for the NAPA/Quincy units looked appealing for the 6 cfm plasma cutter requirement.