Hugo L.
Well-known member
Hugo L. that's a legitimate question, especially since I haven't posted anything about the apparatus that was fabricated to support the eye-bolt or the underlying structure of the house that was designed to support the lift in general.
It's been a long day and will be a short night and another long day for me tomorrow so can I ask you to please hold that thought until I can do a proper post about it all?
![]()
For now know that, yes, everything associated with the lift support is overkill. The eye-bolt is forged and rated at supporting 13,500 lbs (6,124 kg). It's plenty beefy. The steel used in the mount fabrication is all 1/2" (1.2 cm) material and the whole mechanism is all supported by no less than 7 trusses located in the second floor. I'll show it all to you when I'm not so tired.
Many thanks to SiGmA_X for posting a link to the post where I at least showed some of what is involved in supporting the lift.
More to come including pictures of the lift in action. Today it was used to successfully lower material into the wood shop as per design. It was a good day.
Thomas
Well, I'm still holding that thought...

While you're at it, another question came to mind : any attached garage must be airtight, as to prevent any carbon monoxyde from entering the house. As such, I know that the Canadian Building Code demands that the door connecting the house and the garage be fitted with an auto-close mechanism (just like any store, for example), be it spring loaded or pneumatic.
As well, you can't have the same air exchanger connected to the garage and the rest of the house, for the same reasons.
How did this setup manage to get a thumbs-up from the inspectors? I would think that there has got to be a gap around the lift platform where CO2 could infiltrate, therefore contaminating the rest of the house?


