marlinspike
Well-known member
Just look at all the people on here that go out and buy used tools and then want to get them warrantied.
Am I the only person who considers the people who do this to be despicable low level grifters?
Just look at all the people on here that go out and buy used tools and then want to get them warrantied.
I have gotta add a couple of things. Many people have brought up great points, but one I haven't heard is this: Americans don't even know tools anymore. Show some pictures and ask the average kid to name a screwdriver, a hammer, a ratchet, and a wrench and I would be surprised if the average was better than a 50%. And those are the most common tools. For most of us, we new those by the time we were 5. Now how many of those people even think about a quality difference when purchasing tools. They just see tools and get the cheapest one thinking they all do the same thing.
When I was growing up, Craftsman was the brand you went for if you wanted quality. It was advertised that way on woodworking and auto shows. They always also played commercials about their difference and reputation. Somewhere along the way they gave up on educating the population. I mean who doesn't remember Bob Villa and craftsman?
Am I the only person who considers the people who do this to be despicable low level grifters?
Y'know, here's the thing:
The tool has a lifetime warranty. If the end-user buys it used or damaged, and warranties it, they're not doing a single thing wrong. They're not scamming anyone, they're not defrauding anyone, they're not grifting anyone.
Now, I certainly think that if you're taking a perfectly working tool that just isn't brand-new shiny and warrantying it, rather than just using it, you're a jackass, but even then, you're still not really doing anything wrong, per the wording of the warranty, and per statements made by Sears executive management.
The warranty pretty clearly states that if your satsifaction is impacted in any way, you're allowed to return it for repair/replacement.
But that's kind of besides the point. The bigger point here is that all of this speculation on the warranty "abuse" being a major impact to Sears bottom line? It's just that - speculation.
More speculation: I don't believe for a second that so-called "abuse" of the lifetime warranty measurably impacts Sears bottom line. If it did, they would have changed it by now.
I believe that the goodwill fostered by that rather fantastic warranty brings in far more sales than it sends out replacements, by an astronomical amount.
When I first started getting serious about tools, I was hunting pawn shops and what not for good tools. I picked up a fair amount of Craftsman, solely because of that warranty - because I knew if I had any issues, I'd get a replacement for it.
And yeah, I bought a handful of pieces (a couple wrenches, a couple sockets, a bad ratchet) that were obviously broken, because I knew I could exchange them - and I did.
And that very warranty that allowed me to do that? That's why I've spent several thousand dollars at Sears over the last decade. Because that warranty fostered goodwill and encouraged me to shop at Sears (and not just for Craftsman hand tools).
Obviously, the recent developments have eroded a fair amount of that goodwill, but the fact remains:
Because of a couple bucks of warranty returns of used tools, I've spent thousands of dollars on new tools and other merchandise.
I think there's plenty of anecdotal evidence to suggest that the warranty isn't the driver for these business decisions. Ratchets are a great example - if the warranty replacement was really killing them, they'd be far more engaged in repairing the tools while you wait rather than replacing them - a minimum wage employee spending 10-15 minutes swapping a maintenance kit is far cheaper than giving you a new ratchet off the shelf.
Y'know, here's the thing:
The tool has a lifetime warranty. If the end-user buys it used or damaged, and warranties it, they're not doing a single thing wrong. They're not scamming anyone, they're not defrauding anyone, they're not grifting anyone.
Now, I certainly think that if you're taking a perfectly working tool that just isn't brand-new shiny and warrantying it, rather than just using it, you're a jackass, but even then, you're still not really doing anything wrong, per the wording of the warranty, and per statements made by Sears executive management.
The warranty pretty clearly states that if your satsifaction is impacted in any way, you're allowed to return it for repair/replacement.
But that's kind of besides the point. The bigger point here is that all of this speculation on the warranty "abuse" being a major impact to Sears bottom line? It's just that - speculation.
More speculation: I don't believe for a second that so-called "abuse" of the lifetime warranty measurably impacts Sears bottom line. If it did, they would have changed it by now.
I believe that the goodwill fostered by that rather fantastic warranty brings in far more sales than it sends out replacements, by an astronomical amount.
When I first started getting serious about tools, I was hunting pawn shops and what not for good tools. I picked up a fair amount of Craftsman, solely because of that warranty - because I knew if I had any issues, I'd get a replacement for it.
And yeah, I bought a handful of pieces (a couple wrenches, a couple sockets, a bad ratchet) that were obviously broken, because I knew I could exchange them - and I did.
And that very warranty that allowed me to do that? That's why I've spent several thousand dollars at Sears over the last decade. Because that warranty fostered goodwill and encouraged me to shop at Sears (and not just for Craftsman hand tools).
Obviously, the recent developments have eroded a fair amount of that goodwill, but the fact remains:
Because of a couple bucks of warranty returns of used tools, I've spent thousands of dollars on new tools and other merchandise.
I think there's plenty of anecdotal evidence to suggest that the warranty isn't the driver for these business decisions. Ratchets are a great example - if the warranty replacement was really killing them, they'd be far more engaged in repairing the tools while you wait rather than replacing them - a minimum wage employee spending 10-15 minutes swapping a maintenance kit is far cheaper than giving you a new ratchet off the shelf.
You pay more for tools that are covered for life. The warranty liability is covered in whole or in part by the original purchase price. If warranty obligations were such a huge concern Sears would have long ago increased quality or price. I have way to many tools to remember where each came from. Am I to forfeit all warranties for that reason? What about the few thousand dollars worth I've received as gifts over the last 15 years? Guess I'm a grifter Is there any real proof the made in China Craftsman tools are made to a lower grade. It's not where it's made that matter on quality but the whole QC process. I rather have the tools made here in the U.S. but it's going to cost more to produce and would you guys that complain about where it's made have a problem with paying 30 to 40% more on the tools?
Obviously if you're 40 years old taking a ratchet in for warranty that was built in 1950 might justify an exception, but beyond something like that I don't see a problem.
All of the Craftsman tools I own are made in the U.S. Most of them are 10 years old and counting. I'll have to go to sears and pick up a Chinese made ones and compare. I been to HF a few times and never got anything there. I think some of the member's just expect to much from HF and Sears for the price you pay. Everything is more expensive now and the target consumer for sears has changed too.
But that's pretty much what I've seen people here doing. I think I even saw a poster on here recently complaining that they were replacing his 30 year old ratchet with a rebuilt one.
But that's pretty much what I've seen people here doing. I think I even saw a poster on here recently complaining that they were replacing his 30 year old ratchet with a rebuilt one.
Here's the thing: It doesn't matter if it's 50 years, 100 years, 10 years, or 1 year.
Here's the text of the warranty:
Craftsman hand tools are guaranteed forever. If any Craftsman hand tool ever fails to give complete satisfaction, return it to Sears for free repair or replacement. This warranty gives you specific rights and you may also have other rights which vary from state to state. Other Craftsman tools are covered by limited warranties.
It doesn't say "original purchase" it doesn't list any time frame on that. It doesn't say "lifetime", so there's no argument to be had about the owner's lifetime, or the original purchaser's lifetime, or the tool's lifetime - it says that the tool is guaranteed. FOREVER.
That's pretty damned explicit.
That's what makes (or made) Craftsman great - I could pick up an old rusty ratchet that I found in a field and get it repaired or replaced, without issue.
As far as people complaining about getting a rebuild, having seen most of the comments here about that very subject, virtually all of them have been around taking in a broken ratchet, and having a rebuild of lesser quality/condition (albeit one that is functional) provided to them as the replacement.
I see no issue with that - if I take in a 30 year old ratchet that's in beautiful condition, with the only issue being a broken pawl, or busted teeth on the gear, and they try to give me a nicked-up banged-up scratched-up ratchet that someone used as a hammer? You can bet that I don't want that rebuild.
But, even if they're taking in a ratchet and being given a rebuild instead of a new ratchet? Well, sorry, but, let's read the guarantee again:
If any Craftsman hand tool ever fails to give complete satisfaction, return it to Sears for free repair or replacement. This warranty gives you specific rights and you may also have other rights which vary from state to state. Other Craftsman tools are covered by limited warranties.
Complete satisfaction is the guarantee that Sears themselves published.
While I'm not going to have much sympathy for someone that isn't being handed brand-new-off-the-shelf ratchets, and instead is being provided an equal-or-better-quality/condition rebuilt ratchet, if they're not satisfied with that rebuild, well, the warranty is pretty clear.
Personally, my belief is that, on most above-average quality tools, breakage isn't that common, so having an incredibly liberal warranty policy (a'la Sears/Craftsman) isn't a bank-breaker, so beating around the bush in an attempt to limit warranty claims is just ridiculous.
But your example was finding a rusted tool in a field, not a snapped in half combination wrench.
Craftsman is not going to china to cover warranty abuse. The price of warranty replacement is built into every craftsman tool when you buy it. The greedy bastards just figured out a way to capitalize on the craftsman tool reputation by charging craftsman prices for junk china tools.
It's more sad than funny that's what people think about companies that do what they need to do in order to survive--and in the case of sears is not really working. Do you say that about snap on?
I have an old set of US made craftsman professional full polished combination wrenches that were probably the first that came out. They are thin and strong, and very nicely made as far as I can tell. The new Chinese made ones I saw at sears are thicker and the finish doesn't look as good. I don't buy craftsman anymore anyway, but it ***** when you have to warranty a US tool and get a Chinese replacement.
If/when Dual 80's, Combo wrenches, or any other hardline item pops up stamped CHINA the anger here will register on the Richter scale.
Why does it ****? They are still giving you a replacement tool and you still get that forever warranty. I want to see some good proof on the poorly made Cman stuff in China. I want to see test on the old and new stuff. A lot of this is in your head I think. ( The new Chinese made ones I saw at sears are thicker and the finish doesn't look as good. ) Maybe they are making it thicker to make it stronger and maybe they have to use a new chrome process that more green which leads to poor finish. I know for a fact car paint is more Green friendly now but it's not as durable.
As has been stated a number of times, the lobster-claw wrench heads are markedly larger than counterparts from earlier production, or other brands.
There's photographic evidence, posted here on these boards, that confirms the size of the head, both in side-profile and thickness. This definitely has the potential of leading to clearance issues.
It's entirely possible that I'll never run into an application where this would become an issue to me, but I really not all that exuberant about one of my good wrenches being replaced with one of these monstrosities.
As far as finish, if anything, it should be BETTER, since there aren't the environmental/green restrictions on that stuff in it's new manufacturing location.
^^^
What did you want them to say? You are hearing from a basic CSR here. It's not like they can say, "Gee, you're right. I'm going to stop havin the company make tools in China tomorrow. Thank you from bringing this to our attention."
It will take an awful lot of similar type complaints for a change to happen and bring tool manufacturing back to the US. Maybe they can have 2 lines. A home line manufactured in China/ Taiwan/ India and market their professional line to "professionals" or people like us. Tools could be made in the USA but would cost more BUT be of higher quality.
Bottom line if you don't like Cman and their ways of doing business don't buy them and support them.
China might not be that green but I think they are trying to be. No one know wants to sh@t where they sleep, even the Chinese.
Bottom line if you don't like Cman and their ways of doing business don't buy them and support them.
It's more sad than funny that's what people think about companies that do what they need to do in order to survive--and in the case of sears is not really working. Do you say that about snap on?
You think they're shifting production to survive? They're giving you harbor freight quality for US Craftsman prices. Some bean counters found a way to capitalize on the craftsman name and they're whoring it out for all it's worth. People here may know tool differences but I buy from a lot of garage sales and estate sales and I can tell you first hand that the general home-owner tool-buying population ranks craftsman as top of the line.
As has been stated a number of times, the lobster-claw wrench heads are markedly larger than counterparts from earlier production, or other brands.
There's photographic evidence, posted here on these boards, that confirms the size of the head, both in side-profile and thickness. This definitely has the potential of leading to clearance issues.
Personally, I don't like senseless bashing threads. And, I think we do have too much anti-Craftsman stuff on here.
That being said, it's dismissive to refer to every critical thread as "bashing."
I can think of reasons in the following categories for wanting to buy USA tools: political; economic; environmental; humanitarian; qualitative.
And so, a company swapping out a couple lifetimes of a USA-reputation is going to be received critically by some folks. It makes sense, and Sears needs to take the good with the bad for whatever decisions their executive structure makes.
But the GJ anti sears and coo mofia totally disregard this. If it is not made in the USA form craftmans and at super discount, they will not buy them. On sale 90 dollars craftsman pros wrench set never sold well, but they will buy pretty much the same craftsman industrial for 60 buck on clearance. All the flag waivers here saying they would pay more for USA made, really do not. They want USA at china prices. That is the real deal with allot of GJ members.