To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Unusual Plierench

usernameless

Active member
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
25
I swear I constantly come across unidentifiable tools! Yep this plierench is like the majority in design but with an added feature that I can not find anywhere online or in their catalogs at least so far. It appears the added feature is to lock the handle in place? I dunno, anyone ever seen one like this?
 

Attachments

  • 20240622_172005.jpg
    20240622_172005.jpg
    765.2 KB · Views: 296
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

geneg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
468
Location
Midwest
I swear I constantly come across unidentifiable tools! Yep this plierench is like the majority in design but with an added feature that I can not find anywhere online or in their catalogs at least so far. It appears the added feature is to lock the handle in place? I dunno, anyone ever seen one like this?
The handles appear to be aftermarket slip on. Spray some lube into the one with the lock & slide it off. I'd be interested in the attachment method of the threaded tab to the handle. May be a well executed owner modification.

The Plierench, Chicago 40 stamping would seem to indicate 40's to 50's. The reeded adjustment screw doesn't fit into that era.

No matter what- it is a great find & I would have grabbed it.
 
OP
U

usernameless

Active member
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
25
The handles appear to be aftermarket slip on. Spray some lube into the one with the lock & slide it off. I'd be interested in the attachment method of the threaded tab to the handle. May be a well executed owner modification.

The Plierench, Chicago 40 stamping would seem to indicate 40's to 50's. The reeded adjustment screw doesn't fit into that era.

No matter what- it is a great find & I would have grabbed it.
Thanks for the insights!
I suspect you're correct in that it's a modification but I'm leaning more towards manufacturers modification because it's too perfectly made, right down to the plating. The handle covers will not budge in the slightest so I don't want to ruin it by forcing it off. However, I do have two of these so it has to be a manufacturers mod for special applications. I'm guessing plierench co didn't do that much like other companies such as Bernard's parallel pliers did. Or maybe it was a failed idea that never made it to catalog? Also, I figure that this design obviously turns the pliers into a clamp. I tried it as a clamp and it works quite well!
 

geneg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
468
Location
Midwest
Thanks for the insights!
I suspect you're correct in that it's a modification but I'm leaning more towards manufacturers modification because it's too perfectly made, right down to the plating. The handle covers will not budge in the slightest so I don't want to ruin it by forcing it off. However, I do have two of these so it has to be a manufacturers mod for special applications. I'm guessing plierench co didn't do that much like other companies such as Bernard's parallel pliers did. Or maybe it was a failed idea that never made it to catalog? Also, I figure that this design obviously turns the pliers into a clamp. I tried it as a clamp and it works quite well!
Thanks for the info. Having 2 of them does make it look like mfg vs machine shop. It still looks like the slip on covers are newer than the imprinted address. I probably wouldn't take them off either if they're that attached. On 1 of my hard drives I have a ton of Eifel literature & saved info. I'll try to locate it to see if they refer to any the Bernard type customization.

A few years ago on Tooltalk someone had a ton of Eifel salesman promotional materials, both samples & paper. They only posted once or twice & never came back. I seem to remember that they were doing a dollar value search more than information sharing.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Yep this plierench is like the majority in design but with an added feature that I can not find anywhere online or in their catalogs at least so far.
There are a couple with odd clips and special attachments in the main Eifel thread here. Special order was the theory. They were earlier production, though. I don't remember seeing anything like your locking device, though. Lots of literature in the same thread. Again, older though. Click on @four.cycle 's last link.
A few years ago on Tooltalk someone had a ton of Eifel salesman promotional materials, both samples & paper. They only posted once or twice & never came back. I seem to remember that they were doing a dollar value search more than information sharing.
Was it 2021? We had a guy come through here. Same thing. Seemed to be fishing. Posted dozens of links to a complete salesman's kit in a large wooden box. Multiple examples of complete sets, spare parts, extras, a repair block and tools, and all kinds of literature. That thread is here...
https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/threads/the-coolest-eifel-geared-plierwrench-set-youve-probably-ever-seen.482047/
 
Last edited:

geneg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
468
Location
Midwest
There are a couple with odd clips and special attachments in the main Eifel thread here. Special order was the theory. They were earlier production, though. I don't remember seeing anything like your locking device, though. Lots of literature in the same thread. Again, older though. Click on @four.cycle 's last link.

Was it 2021? We had a guy come through here. Same thing. Seemed to be fishing. Posted dozens of links to a complete salesman's kit in a large wooden box. Multiple examples of complete sets, spare parts, extras, a repair block and tools, and all kinds of literature. That thread is here...
https://www.garagejournal.com/forum...youve-probably-ever-seen.482047/#post-9105355
Seemed like it was longer ago, but same photos & similar verbage from a new member. Then no conclusion. Search on TOOLTALK did bring it up now, but didn't yesterday. Guy did 4 posts there then disappeared.
 
Last edited:
OP
U

usernameless

Active member
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
25
Thanks for the info. Having 2 of them does make it look like mfg vs machine shop. It still looks like the slip on covers are newer than the imprinted address. I probably wouldn't take them off either if they're that attached. On 1 of my hard drives I have a ton of Eifel literature & saved info. I'll try to locate it to see if they refer to any the Bernard type customization.

A few years ago on Tooltalk someone had a ton of Eifel salesman promotional materials, both samples & paper. They only posted once or twice & never came back. I seem to remember that they were doing a dollar value search more than information sharing.
I saw a youtube video of a guy restoring an earlier set with all the fancy stampings and embossing. He did quite an amazing job! But he also had a set like mine only without the locking nut and it was identical down to the handle covers. Same thick red rubbery handles. His he said were from around 1970 of which I'm inclined to agree considering his knowledge as he went on about it.
 

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,912
Location
Tacoma, Washington
^ I believe the "papawswrench" link I posted just above will take you to the photos of the salesman's kit. username was mrspikemike
I do not believe he posted them here.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
The later Vaco versions did have red hard rubberoid handles, but they were all marked VACO (R) PLIERENCH (R) as far as I know. These are not marked like that, and I agree with @geneg dating them to "40s or 50s" and the two-digit postal code dates them to NLT 1963. At that time they were owned and still being made by American Plierench.

I don't think anyone has ever done a detailed timeline of the business entities and handoffs (Am. Plierench to Masterform, Masterform to Vaco, etc), but I think there was another company after Vaco, which is a testament to their design and utility.

But it looks like the red handle wraps started well before Vaco and were continued by Vaco.
 
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
ahh okay! Vaco got swallowed up by Klein.
Did Klein make a Plierench?

I was referring to the succession of companies with the rights to make the Plierench, by name, not conglomeration, in general.

Per @lgradwell, who is no longer a GJer, apparently, Galland Henning Nopak, Inc. followed Vaco.

The earliest I can find Vaco advertising the Plierench is 1968, but that's just from me farting around at work searching older GJ threads on my phone, from way before the Great Divide of 2012.

Also found this Photofucket era shot in one of those prehistoric threads. It's too bad the owner didn't put them in chronological order. If he had placed the original (far right) at the far left instead, it would have showed what I believe to be a chronological sequence.
 

Attachments

  • 20240624_113340.jpg
    20240624_113340.jpg
    708.4 KB · Views: 220

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,912
Location
Tacoma, Washington
^OH! No idea if Klein made that unit, Lugz.. I just know that Vaco was acquired at some point by Klein, and when I contacted Klein to ask them a Vaco question (not related in any way to pliers), I was told anyone who might have known anything had either long since retired or died.
I wasn't sure if that photo set was ever posted here.
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,164
Location
SF Bay Area
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Farmer J.

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 18, 2016
Messages
1,995
Location
UK, Cornwall/Hertfordshire.
Did Klein make a Plierench?
I know you're referring to vintage production, but just for general interest Klein do still make a Plier Wrench. I bought one, it's very good, amazingly strong and more versatile than the Knipex ones.
 
OP
U

usernameless

Active member
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
25
The later Vaco versions did have red hard rubberoid handles, but they were all marked VACO (R) PLIERENCH (R) as far as I know. These are not marked like that, and I agree with @geneg dating them to "40s or 50s" and the two-digit postal code dates them to NLT 1953. At that time they were owned and still being made by American Plierench.

I don't think anyone has ever done a detailed timeline of the business entities and handoffs (Am. Plierench to Masterform, Masterform to Vaco, etc), but I think there was another company after Vaco, which is a testament to their design and utility.

But it looks like the red handle wraps started well before Vaco and were continued by Vaco.
The other identical set that came with this set has this metallic sticker on it that reads 3-year guarantee and plierench company of America. Perhaps this helps date it? Not many of that sticker exist either. My guess is that after going on the cheap with only a 3 year guarantee on this design, they realized the blunder and removed the design altogether, considering that the quality and longevity of the plierench minus this mechanism clearly lasts a lifetime.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1755.JPG
    IMG_1755.JPG
    501.4 KB · Views: 119

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,912
Location
Tacoma, Washington
^ looks like it says "Chicago 4?, Illinois" ?? that would be a "postal code" and those dated from ..... about 1949 (?) to about 1963 (?)
(sorry, not clear on exact dates)
 

geneg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
468
Location
Midwest
^ looks like it says "Chicago 4?, Illinois" ?? that would be a "postal code" and those dated from ..... about 1949 (?) to about 1963 (?)
(sorry, not clear on exact dates)
I think the other pair was marked Chicago 40, Illinois. Lugnutzg said earlier: "the 2-digit postal code dates them to NLT 1953".
I'm not certain about the postal code cutoff. In any event, prior to zip codes.

The sticker is really something rare. Another path to track down was the 3 year warranty. Earlier was LT.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
that would be a "postal code" and those dated from ..... about 1949 (?) to about 1963 (?)
(sorry, not clear on exact dates)
1963 is correct. I fat fingered it upthread. Now corrected.
the two-digit postal code dates them to NLT 1963.
//////////////////
The other identical set that came with this set
What do you mean by set? You're showing a single tool with one jaw. Do you have a pouch and extra jaws for each one?
plierench company of America.
Different and much later than American Plierench, believe it or not. I don't have it completed, and I don't have my notes with me, but I took a jab at the timeline and the transitions I alluded to upthread. You won't believe how many ownership changes this tool went through. Off the top of my head, seven or eight, at least.

Check back for more later.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
After a couple days of research, my curiosity itch is thoroughly scratched, and I am confident I have a pretty good timeline, which I have organized in table format.

Plierench Timeline 2.jpg

Notes:

All the data on the left was derived from ads in trade journals, Popular Science, etc. The data on the right was taken directly from the US Patent and Trademark database. I will try to gather up my sources and post some bonafides later.

As you can now see for yourself what I was alluding to earlier, there were several more handoffs than commonly discussed on various vintage tools sites (here on GJ, AA, Pawpaw, etc), and the sequence is not what has been reported prior on other GJ threads.

There are a couple anomalies.

/ I found no record of Vaco Products Company ever owning the TM for Plierench. That they made them is no question, obviously. They ran some ads in 1968 and 1969, but not many, and the tool is not included in the 1968 catalog or a 1969 flyer.

/ The original TM (706,606), by Plierench Company of America, had no assignments. Meaning, there is no record inside the USPTO database of it being transferred to another business entity. At some point, and I don't know how, Mssrs Samuel and Joseph Kaplan, d.b.a. American Plumbing Supply Co., had to have ended up with rights to it, because in the record for the Masterform Tool Company TM (906,630), it was assigned to Masterform, in mense, from the Kaplan brothers, vis-a-vis a law firm handling their creditors. (They were in all kinds of debt, being sued by banks, etc, and they probably sold it for cash.) Note that their business address is the same address that Plierench Co. of America was using since 1958 and American Plierench Corp'n was using since 1938! That leads me to believe American Supply Co. was just another name change, or they assumed control somehow. There is zero doubt that the rights to the TM went in rather rapid succession from Masterform to a company called Plierrench Tools, Inc., and from Plierench Tools, Inc. to Galland, Henning, Nopak, which still owns it.

I will keep digging on those two areas for a bit, but the rest of the info is validated.

////////////////////////

Housekeeping: I was thinking about putting this at the end of the main Eifel-geared Plierench thread, or woody's original thread, but the former is mainly examples and discussion of the early tools, and the latter is stuck up on the General Tools discussion board, and it would be abrupt on either one. It fits here because the subject here led to the general discussion of the red rubberoid jobbies and the later transitions. I'll x-link this to those threads and add this one to A-Z Index in the Sticky as 'Later Versions' or something like that for ease of finding it later.
 
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Well, it's been an interesting and very rewarding over-caffienated morning.

20210411_164108.jpg

Why the heck am I leading off my update with a close-up of the branding on one of my Whale Tool Corp "Pli-Rench" tools?

Because Plierench Co. of America v. Whale Tool Corp. (1964) was the key to answering both anomalies! :)

Plierench Co. of America lost - believe it or not. More on that below.

My hunch here...
Note that their business address is the same address that Plierench Co. of America was using since 1958 and American Plierench Corp'n was using since 1938! That leads me to believe American Supply Co. was just another name change, or they assumed control somehow.
...was correct.

Joesph Eifel didn't change the name of his company from American Plierrench Corp'n to Plierench Company of America in 1958. The Kaplans did. It was the Kaplans who applied for the TM. And that's why it was the Kaplans assigning "the entire interest, and the good will" of Plierench to Masterform in 1970. I still don't know how they ended up with the company, but a purchase is likely.

The case also answered this...
/ I found no record of Vaco Products Company ever owning the TM for Plierench. That they made them is no question, obviously. They ran some ads in 1968 and 1969, but not many, and the tool is not included in the 1968 catalog or a 1969 flyer.

/ The original TM (706,606), by Plierench Company of America, had no assignments. Meaning, there is no record inside the USPTO database of it being transferred to another business entity.
There is no record of the TM being assigned to any other entity because it was cancelled. Almost certainly due to the 1964 lawsuit. That would explain why Masterform had to submit an application to re-register it. I don't know why that was granted when the court found against the Kaplans in 1964, but Masterform was awarded a new TM in 1970.

I have a request with Google Books to open this document up, but I was able to stitch enough snippet views together to make enough sense of the case, which, as I said up-post, Plierench lost! I am guessing because Joseph Eifel never trademarked the name!

Plierench Corp of America vs Whale Tool Corp.jpg

In hindsight, as a collector, full of the reverence these legendary tools evoke, the skeptical, derisive, passive-aggressive language in the decision casting doubts on the history of the tool (e.g., "purported originator," "which according to the testimony," and the parenthetical "because Mr. Eifel told him so"), seems almost unfathomable, and it kind of pisses me off! Such is the affection we can have for collectibles. :)
 
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Google Books was a "no" on the unlock. That must not be a government document, but some kind of court stringers publication. But I can't find the case anywhere else. I think the outcome is clear, but it would be nice to see it.

I updated the graphic. I think it represents the whole story - that of a quirky guy who built a couple companies and a whole life around a single ingenious tool for 40 years, and then a bunch of other companies milking whatever they could out of the remains for another 60 years, but if anyone has any questions, just ask.

Plierench Timeline 2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Plierench Timeline 2.jpg
    Plierench Timeline 2.jpg
    227.6 KB · Views: 96
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
If you search Google Books on "Plierench" with a key year in the sequence, you will find plenty of documentation matching the sequence. All the Masterform and Plierench Tools Co ads were snippet only views. No examples. And if you plug any of those TM numbers into the USPTO Trademark Status and Document Retrieval site, you can see all the TM records.

But here are some examples of ads after the Eifel years, in sequence...
 

Attachments

  • 1958 Plierench Co Am 1958.jpg
    1958 Plierench Co Am 1958.jpg
    187.8 KB · Views: 56
  • 1960 Am Specialty Co.jpg
    1960 Am Specialty Co.jpg
    96.4 KB · Views: 46
  • 1960 Scott-Mitchell.jpg
    1960 Scott-Mitchell.jpg
    197.5 KB · Views: 42
  • 1964 Empire Mdsg.jpg
    1964 Empire Mdsg.jpg
    161.2 KB · Views: 40
  • 1968 1969 Vaco.jpg
    1968 1969 Vaco.jpg
    213 KB · Views: 39
  • 1969 Am Supply Co.jpg
    1969 Am Supply Co.jpg
    64.8 KB · Views: 31
  • 1970 Am Supply Co.jpg
    1970 Am Supply Co.jpg
    80 KB · Views: 31
  • 1984 Galland Henning Nopak.jpg
    1984 Galland Henning Nopak.jpg
    139.2 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Here is the TM story in documents...
 

Attachments

  • TM Plierench Company America 1960 first use 1924.jpg
    TM Plierench Company America 1960 first use 1924.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 26
  • TM Plierench Company America 1960 Cancelled.jpg
    TM Plierench Company America 1960 Cancelled.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 24
  • TM Masterform 1970 first use 1923.jpg
    TM Masterform 1970 first use 1923.jpg
    80.2 KB · Views: 23
  • TM Masterform 1970 Expired.jpg
    TM Masterform 1970 Expired.jpg
    62.3 KB · Views: 23
  • TM GHN 1999.jpg
    TM GHN 1999.jpg
    82.3 KB · Views: 20

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
And here are the handoffs between the Kaplans/their lawyer (i.e., Plierench Co. of Am., then American Supply Co.) to Masterform, Masterform to Plierench Tools, and Plierench Tools to Galland, Henning, Nopak.
 

Attachments

  • Assignment 1 Kaplans to Yorke.jpg
    Assignment 1 Kaplans to Yorke.jpg
    107.8 KB · Views: 20
  • Assignment 2 Yorke to Masterform.jpg
    Assignment 2 Yorke to Masterform.jpg
    91.2 KB · Views: 20
  • Assignment 3 Masterform to Plierench.jpg
    Assignment 3 Masterform to Plierench.jpg
    60.8 KB · Views: 19
  • Assignment 4 Plierench to GHN.jpg
    Assignment 4 Plierench to GHN.jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 49

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,912
Location
Tacoma, Washington
not sure where this fits into the picture.
just found this last night while searching for something else.
 

Attachments

  • 1962 Empire Mdsg. Co. Plierench ad pp.jpg
    1962 Empire Mdsg. Co. Plierench ad pp.jpg
    881.4 KB · Views: 132

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,236
Location
The Badlands
And here I am, thx Lugz!

I was split between WW and a bath, but I suspected (correctly) that these were more of a blued/black oxide finish, so I used my fine 4" (slow/weak) wire wheel and "polished" most of the rust out, I had to do some scraping in the jaw guide grooves to get it completely freed up:

The printed side has some pitting, and some rust in deep places will need a wire brush and oil to get but with some chalk, its decipherable now:

It is from the "American Plierench" era, despite the red grips. I was expecting Vaco era! So 1935-57, likely the later part since it has the grips.

Amer Plierench Crimpers a.jpg


Amer Plierench Crimpers b.jpg

These are the Smallest pair I've seen at 7".

Amer Plierench Crimpers c markings.jpg


Amer Plierench Crimpers d Jaws 1.jpg

And the Jaws; I can't see as they would do anything but crimp, unless they were special made for gripping some slotted something? these would work well for in situ crimping where it maybe made more sense to install the lug, then bring the wire to the lug. its certainly not for a small under 12 Ga crimp. That would explain the diagonal approach - keeping the pliers out of the way of stuff..

Amer Plierench Crimpers d Jaws 2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,575
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
It is from the "American Plierench" era, despite the red grips. I was expecting Vaco era! So 1938-57, likely the later part since it has the grips.
Cleaned up well, and yes, I am surprised by the production era as well. If not Vaco, which came much later, I was expecting Plierench Corp of America, which followed American Plierench Corp.

Oddly, that pinned-on stainless steel clip seems to serve the same purpose as the device on the pliers in the first post. That one was secured to the handle with the grips and turned in and out like a set screw. Yours just pivots into place. Both of them seem to securely lock the jaw into place instead of only relying on the LOCKS THIS WAY switch. The implication is that it was prone to slipping. Sequentially, yours came first, then the other, so whether they're factory or aftermarket (EDIT: which is what I suspect), it sure looks like a crude "fix" or improvement, followed by a different, more sophisticated approach.
 
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom