To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Vise Info Thread

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

KMScott

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
4,632
Location
Daufuskie Island, South Carolina
Goodell-Pratt Company #679. 2" jaws that opens to 4-3/8" and weights 5 lbs.
 

Attachments

  • Goodell-Pratt Company-679-1.jpg
    Goodell-Pratt Company-679-1.jpg
    959.4 KB · Views: 24
  • Goodell-Pratt Company-679-2.jpg
    Goodell-Pratt Company-679-2.jpg
    899.1 KB · Views: 20
  • Goodell-Pratt Company-679-3.jpg
    Goodell-Pratt Company-679-3.jpg
    889.6 KB · Views: 20
  • Goodell-Pratt Company-679-5.jpg
    Goodell-Pratt Company-679-5.jpg
    877.2 KB · Views: 17
  • Goodell-Pratt Company-679-4.jpg
    Goodell-Pratt Company-679-4.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 19

master Zoda

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
165
20230731_135418.jpg
Here is a Stanley 741 not from Jersey. Do you want to add it to the spreadsheet? I could add some more pictures and specs.
 

master Zoda

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
165
Stanley 741 patent 1 28 08. One ear is broken of the clamp handle it looks like it happened long ago. Overall in decent shape I plan to leave it as is. I did clean the tail to find out exactly what was stamped on it unfortunately Stanley is illegal.20230731_135418.jpg20230731_182305.jpg20230731_182309.jpg20230731_182316.jpg20230731_182407.jpg
I have been hoping to come across some version of the Stanley Sweetheart for sometime I have even considered buying one off ebay. I came across this one at a flee market I am very pleased. The stamp is different then most of the ones I have seen pictures of and there is no embellishments in the casting. The dimensions are a bit different than the Jersey 714 on the spreadsheet.

Weight 2.8lbs
Jaw width is rite at 1-1/2"
Opens 1-11/16"

I would love to hear some more information on these vises I there are a few guys on here that have gobs of them.
 

Attachments

  • 20230731_182253.jpg
    20230731_182253.jpg
    854.1 KB · Views: 17

akasrick

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2017
Messages
794
Location
south jersey
Stanley 741 patent 1 28 08. One ear is broken of the clamp handle it looks like it happened long ago. Overall in decent shape I plan to leave it as is. I did clean the tail to find out exactly what was stamped on it unfortunately Stanley is illegal.
I have been hoping to come across some version of the Stanley Sweetheart for sometime I have even considered buying one off ebay. I came across this one at a flee market I am very pleased. The stamp is different then most of the ones I have seen pictures of and there is no embellishments in the casting. The dimensions are a bit different than the Jersey 714 on the spreadsheet.

Weight 2.8lbs
Jaw width is rite at 1-1/2"
Opens 1-11/16"

I would love to hear some more information on these vises I there are a few guys on here that have gobs of them.
'm-Z'

Congratz on your find.
Looking at the Stanley catalogs that I have here, it
looks as if the date on that vise is somewhere between 1914 - 1926.
Both of those catalogs are available for download online.
Possibly more catalogs are available between those dates.
No gobs here.

akasrick
 

master Zoda

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
165
'm-Z'

Congratz on your find.
Looking at the Stanley catalogs that I have here, it
looks as if the date on that vise is somewhere between 1914 - 1926.
Both of those catalogs are available for download online.
Possibly more catalogs are available between those dates.
No gobs here.

akasrick
I have seen some with an additional pat date from 1917 stamped on in addition to the 08 date. I was assuming this meant it was made prior to 1917 but I could be wrong.
 

Patrickm82

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Messages
789
Location
Massachusetts
Have any of you guys seen a prentiss 50 with 1240 cast into the front of the dynamic jaw? Any ideas on what it refers to. Mfg. date?
 

master Zoda

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
165
I mean one like mine without the 1917 stamp would have been made prior to 1917. I have seen other examples with both dates. So my assumption was that one with only the 08 stamp and not 08 and 17 would have been made prior to 17.
Screenshot_20230803_085448_Chrome.jpgThis is interesting I imagine the change in embem would translate to the vises as well. So mine would be the latest version.
 

master Zoda

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
165
Where are you dating your vise at?

akasrick
At first I was thinking that it was prior to 1917 based on the fact that it is stamped with the 1908 date but is missing the 1917 that I have seen stamped on other examples of stanley vises.

If the above information is correct and my vise has the third version of the sweetheart emblem then it must be from 1923 to 32.

I am no expert on the subject and I am trying to learn what I can about my litle sweetheart.

Of course that article has nothing to do with vises so it could be totally irrelevant.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,094
Location
The Badlands
Some but while the same guy started both companies, guns had a long history of fancy engraving. Vices were built by blacksmiths in their early history.
 

CRSINMICH

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
2,393
Location
Southeastern Michigan

Bicycles were wildly popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Nearly everyone wanted to get into the act - including vise manufacturers. Here are a few from noted vise makers
HOLLANDS BICYCLE VISE

 

Attachments

  • 1888 Hollands Star bicycle vise.jpg
    1888 Hollands Star bicycle vise.jpg
    468.6 KB · Views: 24
  • 1896 Hollands Star bicycle vise.jpg
    1896 Hollands Star bicycle vise.jpg
    438.2 KB · Views: 9
  • 1899 Hollands Bicycle Vise edited.jpg
    1899 Hollands Bicycle Vise edited.jpg
    268 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,094
Location
The Badlands
This may possibly be a Goodell-Pratt (part No. in the Vise Spreadsheet, but no real details or links? - so possibly completing more info there.)

Small clamp-on vise, and the only mark I can find is No. 663 on the Main screw head (How I found a spread sheet listing) - 1-7/16 jaws, weighs 2 lbs maybe a touch over, 1-1/2 opening and still have full engagement of the slide bars inside, 2" bench capacity, (maybe a fraction more - Free at an estate sale yesterday.

ES1 No 663 vise.jpg
 

Fierljeppen

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
1,159
LESSER KNOWN BICYCLE VISES

Thanks to the vise ad from @CRSINMICH, I'd like to solve the mystery bicycle vise that has been mislabeled a "Hollands Star" before, including a current eBay listing.

dry_dock_iron_bicycle_vise-b01.jpg dry_dock_iron_bicycle_vise-b02.jpg

It's a "Dry Dock Iron Co." bicycle vise, patented by W. J. Wanless on March 30, 1897.

1897_03-30_US-579,618_w.j.wanless_pg.1.jpg 1897_03-30_US-579,618_w.j.wanless_pg.2.jpg 1897_03-30_US-579,618_w.j.wanless_pg.3.jpg 1897_03-30_US-579,618_w.j.wanless_pg.4.jpg 1897_03-30_US-579,618_w.j.wanless_pg.5.jpg

Previously, I always thought the vise in question was related in some way to the Lewis Tool Co. bicycle vise. But after seeing the second page of the patent, I think the Lewis Tool bicycle vise is probably a derivative of the W. J. Wanless vise.

Thanks for the information Chris! That was fun, let's do it again.
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,063
Location
SF Bay Area
At first I was thinking that it was prior to 1917 based on the fact that it is stamped with the 1908 date but is missing the 1917 that I have seen stamped on other examples of stanley vises.

If the above information is correct and my vise has the third version of the sweetheart emblem then it must be from 1923 to 32.

I am no expert on the subject and I am trying to learn what I can about my litle sweetheart.

Of course that article has nothing to do with vises so it could be totally irrelevant.
Remember, all this information on logo dating and era's was all done posthumously by collectors. It's not something Stanley recorded in real time. But I would believe the logos over features etc.

Regarding your patent #, it could be that the feature from the '17 patent was removed from the vise.

Certain plane timelines are based on the standard #4 plane, and people freak out when their fancy specialty plane doesn't line up with the features listed. Some plane they sold 1000s per day vs a few thousand a decade should not be compared for features, especially if its something that is unique to both. I imagine vises were the same way. A feature dated at 1923 to '32 could show up in 1940 in a slow seller.
 
Last edited:

master Zoda

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
165
Remember, all this information on logo dating and era's was all done posthumously by collectors. It's not something Stanley recorded in real time. But I would believe the logos over features etc.

Regarding your patent #, it could be that the feature from the '17 patent was removed from the vise.

Certain plane timelines are based on the standard #4 plane, and people freak out when their fancy specialty plane doesn't line up with the features listed. Some plane they sold 1000s per day vs a few thousand a decade should not be compared for features, especially if its something that is unique to both. I imagine vises were the same way. A feature dated at 1923 to '32 could show up in 1940 in a slow seller.
I would like to know what year they began casting Stanley or the model numbers into the side? What years did they change the stamped logo and when did they stop doing it? What year did they start?

It is just one of those things I really really want a clear timeline. I love these little things I would really like to have a clear picture of evolution and history.
 

KMScott

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
4,632
Location
Daufuskie Island, South Carolina
Woods, Yea I agree. The 68 has cast in jaws where the 568 has replaceable ones. Might be the reason for a model number change.

Added the bicycle vises CRS, the Dry Dock bicycle vise from Fierljeppen and the 663 from Outlaw. Thanks guys
 
Last edited:

ranger08

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Messages
287
This may possibly be a Goodell-Pratt (part No. in the Vise Spreadsheet, but no real details or links? - so possibly completing more info there.)

Small clamp-on vise, and the only mark I can find is No. 663 on the Main screw head (How I found a spread sheet listing) - 1-7/16 jaws, weighs 2 lbs maybe a touch over, 1-1/2 opening and still have full engagement of the slide bars inside, 2" bench capacity, (maybe a fraction more - Free at an estate sale yesterday.

ES1 No 663 vise.jpg
although 663 is a model from Goodell pratt, yours is not one of the ones shown from the early 1920s to mid 1950s
it has no horn, the under bench screw is different and has no raised panel with the company stamped on it.
zzzzz.JPG
this is my 664
20230808_132558 (1).jpg
I think yours is made by goodell pratt however one of their models sold through the millers falls label (mohawk and shelburne) as their cheaper range
kkk.JPG
 

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,094
Location
The Badlands
although 663 is a model from Goodell pratt, yours is not one of the ones shown from the early 1920s to mid 1950s
it has no horn, the under bench screw is different and has no raised panel with the company stamped on it.


Ranger you are looking at the wrong Image: see the "160" series -Its either missing a paper sticker or G-P made it for others to brand. the knurled knob and machined pad on the clamp are an exact match yours is the 161 series:


g-p-vise-jpg.1931905
 
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom