Trying to hide a seam and screw line
As I said earlier, that's NOT what should determine fixture placement.
I never said they were "junk".
You said "
You DO NOT want plug-in "shop lights", period."
Indeed, I did.
But those are two different statements. The REASONS you don't want them were summarized a few lines down, when I said:
Besides which, junk or not, they simply aren't appropriate for the application at hand -- which is really the larger issue anyway.
And
THAT is the key point: They are simply the wrong tool for the job, regardless of how well-made they may or may not be.
I don't call $15 a fixture el cheapo.
Really? Just how "inexpensive" do you expect such a product to be? You have to figure, by the time all the wholesale/distributor/retail markups are accounted for, along with the packaging, shipping & warehousing costs, and general overhead at each step along the way, the actual manufacturing cost of that "$15" fixture is maybe five bucks, if that much. Just how much "quality workmanship" and/or "precision engineering" do you expect for about the price of a fancy cup of coffee at Starbucks?!?
You are not being realistic.
I think you are overlooking that you can put multiple outlets on a single 20 amp GFI breaker.
Not at all. But what
YOU are obviously overlooking is that exactly the same principle applies to GFCI outlets. Every one I've ever seen (or that you are likely to find), including each of those I cited earlier, has TWO sets of terminals. One set is marked "LINE", and accepts the incoming power feed from the breaker; the other set is marked "LOAD", and is used to feed power "downstream" to additional (standard, non-GFCI) outlets, which then automagically
also become GFCI-protected:
That you are apparently unaware of this tells me that you have never even looked at a GFCI outlet (at least, not one which has not already been installed). Given that, the hubris embodied in your arguing such things is at best comical.
Have you not been paying attention?
You still haven't presented any facts
The Hell I haven't! Each and every one of those numbered bullet points which followed that statement is an incontrovertible FACT. And since you chose to argue with them individually, here they are again:
1. - The NEC requires ALL 120V outlets in shops/garages to be GFCI-protected; GFCIs and fluorescent loads (especially large-ish fluorescent loads) can be a problematic mix, causing (otherwise unnecessary) "nuisance trips".
easily solved by a single inexpensive GFI breaker
Wrong.
It does not matter if the GFCI circuit happens to be installed in a breaker or an outlet, it is still subject to EXACTLY the same "nuisance trip" issues when saddled with an "unfriendly" load, such as a large-ish motor or a bank of fluorescent lights. It is the GFCI circuit itself (and the manner in which it operates), vis-a-vis the characteristics of the load, which potentially causes the problem.
The packaging is utterly irrelevant.
2. - At least most such "shop lights" are NOT rated for direct surface contact, due to heat-dissipation issues. That means they MUST be suspended at some distance below the ceiling (hence the cheap-*** chains typically supplied with them). This often plays hob with your desired light-distribution patterns, as the light now has less opportunity to spread out to the sides before reaching "working height". Hence, you now need still more fixtures, spaced closer together than would otherwise be necessary, in order to avoid spotty uneven lighting.
I think most would be fine direct mounted. I can't imagine there being any more measurable heat than with a hard wired fixture
You can "think" and "imagine" whatever you want. That doesn't change the FACT that, unless a fixture is EXPLICITLY rated for direct surface mounting, it is illegal and dangerous to so mount it. Case in point: The spec sheet for the specific fixture you asked about at the start of this thread (and which you have been irrationally "defending" ever since) EXPLICITLY states:
Code:
Suspended mounting only with included chain.
This admonition is repeated (in more detail and multiple languages) in the installation instructions for that same fixture.
As I said before, that is typical of the type.
3. - The plugs & sockets themselves are inherently less reliable, especially after lots of thermal cycling, than a properly made hard-wired connection.
What? You are saying it's not reliable to plug an appliance in?
I'm saying that a plug & socket connection is not
AS secure or reliable as a properly made hard-wired connection. Now, by comparison to the some of the other issues in this list, this one is perhaps a more minor concern (because it would likely take quite some time for the problem to manifest itself); but it remains true nonetheless.
Also having outlets on the ceiling would make it easier to add more fixtures if desired
Repeating a mistake several times over does not make it less of a mistake.
4. - The cords themselves become an ugly rats nest, which catches all manner of dust & dirt, and becomes next to impossible to keep clean & tidy. And if your area is prone to birds and/or critters with teeth...
I figured they could be neatly shortened up with a bread or zip tie
It would still be an ugly dirt-catching rat's nest; and those coiled-up cords would still be subject to damage from various sources, including critters.
5. - All those (otherwise-unnecessary) boxes, duplex outlets, and switch plates add significant cost to the job.
You are still going to be way less $$$ into than buying $40 per 4 foot of your "prefered" fxiture.
First, where are you getting "$40"? Of the half-dozen or so fixtures that I suggested to you earlier in this thread, only ONE of them approaches that price point. Three others are in the $20-22 range; and two are about $28-30.
Second, assuming you're using quality components (which admittedly is perhaps NOT a safe assumption in your case, what with your penchant for eBay shopping and what not), each of those box/outlet/switchplate combos will likely add something like $5-8 to the cost of each fixture. (cf.
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Cooper-W...lectrical-Outlet-White-TRBR15W-SP-L/203492687,
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Carlon-1...Electrical-Box-B121ADJ/202077339?N=5yc1vZbohn,
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Leviton-...-R62-0PJ26-00W/100356918?N=5yc1vZc6r0Z1z0v9zg, etc.), not to mention the extra labor to install it all. And guess what? That "overhead", plus your $15 bargain-basement "shop light", brings the total cost of doing it wrong right up to what one of those $22 surface-mount fixtures would have cost. Whooda thunk?
More to the point, when choosing your fixtures, you are presumably getting something of value for any "extra" money you spend (say, in the case of picking the $40 fixture vs. the $22 fixture, even if that is done solely for aesthetic reasons). But the cost of those aforementioned boxes, duplex outlets, and switch plates represent an UNNECESSARY expense, which actually buys you nothing of value vis-a-vis a properly installed surface-mount fixture.
So... Are those enough FACTS for you?
Look for bold on my above post, sorry if it's hard to read, except for where you wrote in bold like the word NO WAY
As you will note, I dealt with it. But would it really have been so difficult for you to PROPERLY form the quoted portions of your post?
So, would it be good under "normal code" to just install a GFCI breaker in the panel and have regular 20 amp outlets throughout the garage, verses GFCI outlets in all locations and a regular breaker in the panel?
You are apparently laboring under one of the same misconceptions that "jethrob" is clinging to. In EITHER case, you only need
one GFCI device per branch circuit, provided that you install it correctly.
See the photo & diagram posted above.