I assume sarcasm with the smilies. I can afford both nonissue. Just don’t like them
Double tap.
Last edited:
I assume sarcasm with the smilies. I can afford both nonissue. Just don’t like them
The "drive angle" in my posts refers to the angle at which the driver contacts the fastener edges. Hex sockets have a 60 degree drive angle, which promotes smearing and deformation of the head and tool. This really limits the amount of torque you can reliably (and repeatedly) apply to a fastener without damage.
Torx has a 15 degree drive angle (Torx Plus has a 0 degree), which means nearly all of the force gets applied tangentially to the axis of rotation. This radically improves tool life, and allows more torque at a given head size.
Your claims saying they're "not good for much else" are based solely on rusty undercarriage screws. Like I've said many times, where you need features like high-torque at a given size, high tool life, and high fastener life - Torx is where it's at all. I've worked in industries where they replaced all of the fasteners on their tool with Torx Plus in place of standard hex head cap screws. Stripped and damaged screws basically disappeared.
I assume sarcasm with the smilies. I can afford both nonissue. Just don’t like them
You didn't answer my question.If BMW and Benz are such **** what the hell do you drive that is so great.
German and Japanese engineering are indeed different. German engineering prioritizes performance and functionality above all else. They like cutting edge technologies, and they'll gladly increase the parts-count on a sub-assembly by 30% if it means 5% more performance.
Japanese engineering seems to focus a lot on durability and reliability. They tend to be a bit more conservative, but will push their older, more mature technology to high performing levels.
It's why a 1992 Lexus LS400 has a dedicated old-school cold-start injector, when most American manufacturers hadn't needed that in their EFI systems for 5+ years. It's why the 1996 LS400 still had an antiquated throttle-valve cable controlling the transmission line pressure, when Ford had been using electronic pressure control since '89. But despite that, the LS400 redefined what a high quality, performant luxury sedan could be.
This carries over into other industries as well. I used to work with high end German and Japanese CNC equipment. The German machines were fast, powerful and super accurate - but very trouble prone. Lots of complexity, lots of special tools and procedures to service them. Real headache. The Japanese machines weren't quite as fast or accurate, but they rarely broke, and when they did you could fix 'em with a hammer.
You didn't answer my question.If BMW and Benz are such **** what the hell do you drive that is so great.
Best way to put it right there. They're dying for that last %, no matter the cost.
I'd love to talk to an anthropologist about what makes the Japanese and German peoples like they are.
Japanese cars which are usually better engineered with fewer silly quirks.
...
Modern BMW - Cutting edge innovation in just how much of a $150,000 car they can make out of plastic. Hint: Its a lot. Valve covers made out of plastic and are a maintenance item that needs to be replaced. A hood attached with... Plastic. Interconnected computer systems that are an absolute nightmare to deal with. I'm currently 20 hours into replacing a $5 alternator bracket gasket. Why does a bracket need a gasket? Because the engine has a hole in it. Why does the engine have a hole in it? Who knows. It serves literally no purpose because it gets blocked off by the bracket and gasket... But its there and it requires removing the motor mounts, alternator, power steering pump and parts of the suspension to access.
Nonsense, of course. However, Japanese management know-how retains a significant lead over German management. Toyota’s entire design process is enormously simpler than that of any German maker, and that does lead to simpler, better products.German engineers are rather stupid in comparison with Japanese engineers.
It’s necessary to cut costs. Cutting costs is good engineering. Furthermore, cutting costs has been an essential pillar of the German rise to ********** of the car market.deciding to put a bunch of hard plastic in your engine bay all over the place when it's not necessary and it gets brittle and causes problems and has been doing so for years, yet continuing to do the same stupid **** as VW group does, is bad engineering
Doesn’t sound like you’ve driven a recent Japanese car. They have the same massive A-pillars, daft electronic gadgetry everywhere, senselessly large wheels with senselessly low-profile tyres, etc., as German cars.And they're one of the brands leading the pack of "no visibility out of the damn car" in several of their models. Comparing them to Japanese sensibility is almost insulting.
Previously Toyota’s and currently an f150. It’s built simpler and better than German vehicles.