whateg01
Well-known member
Having the windows right up against the seal would look pretty funny
You really only have less then 3" to the window because it would look stupid if the seal was right up to the window trim area or was covering that last 2" so it seems like they might have made the best choice with the door size.
Pretty sure OP is trolling us at this point with these wack pictures.
Your not posting better pics is telling me there is more to the story. I’m out.
Wow. How precisely do you suggest imaging that 5 inch distance?
Stand back and take a full picture of the outside of the door.
Walk a little closer to highlight the area affected, maybe get even closer and show the gap with tape measure for reference.
Now go inside. Again, take a picture from back in the garage showing the full door.
It is plausible that this size door looks the best, but they added a weatherstrip that occupies significant space, so if one is basing that opinion on the current space, that's not necessarily applicable. That strip would've been unnecessary with a larger door, which is why none was present for the previous half-century.
There’s ISO fish markets. For 9001 you need a quality manual and to pay someone to stare at it for a day. Even AS9100 isn’t terribly difficult.Not sure what an ISO registered garage door install company would be...and I've done a lot of ISO work.
ISO 9999:2022 perhaps? “Assistive technology.” Non healthcare related handicap buttons? Beats me, but that sounds slightly related for door installers.ISO 2022:99 per their site, whatever that is. Maybe I was bamboozled.
There’s ISO fish markets. For 9001 you need a quality manual and to pay someone to stare at it for a day. Even AS9100 isn’t terribly difficult.
ISO 9999:2022 perhaps? “Assistive technology.” Non healthcare related handicap buttons? Beats me, but that sounds slightly related for door installers.
Thanks for the update, Good Luck.update:
Shop owner came out today and inspected, after previously saying he didn't need to. The upshot of which is that, for reasons he either doesn't know, or was unwilling to share, his crew installed 12" radius tracks instead of the 15s that should have been used. That accounts for the main problem, which is the raised door being 4" lower than the original, and the tracks being somewhat haphazardly installed at that height.
So, they will return tomorrow to replace the tracks -- and do a more-professional job of shimming those wall-mounted brackets. Or, perhaps, using brackets that are sufficiently-long for the install. I offered to shim the wall myself, if need be, but he declined.
The explanation for replacing the 7' door with a 6'9" is, as I think I stated before, their concern that the windows will be obscured by the header. That's not correct, since there's 5" clear between the top of the windows and the bottom of the weather-stripping. I decided not to make a further issue of the door-size swap, since it is the case that their quote spec'd a 6'9" door and I could have, and should have, objected to that two months ago, instead of trusting them to make such a decision -- had I recognized the repercussions.
So anyway, thanks for all of the assistance.

I'm well versed in ISO and I'll leave it at that
Go Google ISO 2022:99 garage doors, it certainly is listed by several installers but no real reference to a standard.
This thread really went to a weird place, I think I'm out
