Mike'smeatshop
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2023
- Messages
- 1,273

still waiting to find 11/32 in the wild (SK Wayne socket is replacing it for now...)
Shelbylex said:"...still waiting to find 11/32 in the wild ..."

I have a bit screwdriver, I really like it, its my go to in the bit screwdriver department.I have a quick question:
What are the green and white transparent handles (from screwdrivers and drivers) made out of? Is it Cellulose acetate butyrate? (have a couple of 1/4" drivers in my collection - I wonder if they will eventually start smelling...)
If anybody has SK green and white bit driver (without the white cap version) - please let me know how you like it (if you use it) and post a pic or two...
... I do not think I posted this set yet - still waiting to find 11/32 in the wild (SK Wayne socket is replacing it for now...)
![]()


Is it Cellulose acetate butyrate? (have a couple of 1/4" drivers in my collection - I wonder if they will eventually start smelling...)
I am looking for this mode
You're looking for a late-production 1/4" drive 11/32" six-point?
I'll look later when I've got light.
I’ll check my spares too.
the bit screwdriver department

I do not have any extra 11/32 sockets

No, that was just the pic from an ebay lot I bought, that socket is for like pressure sending units in engines.SKTF, does that socket in the last pic fit the driver handle?![]()
I’ll look around for an 11/32”I have a quick question:
What are the green and white transparent handles (from screwdrivers and drivers) made out of? Is it Cellulose acetate butyrate? (have a couple of 1/4" drivers in my collection - I wonder if they will eventually start smelling...)
If anybody has SK green and white bit driver (without the white cap version) - please let me know how you like it (if you use it) and post a pic or two...
... I do not think I posted this set yet - still waiting to find 11/32 in the wild (SK Wayne socket is replacing it for now...)
![]()
I believe that I have the correct socket to complete your set. Sorry for the blurry picture. It looks like new.





At the urging of a fellow collector on here
I told him about the one in the NOS cardboard box, but I didn't know about the set in a metal box. If you posted that before I missed it. Definitely identical cousins.I have an sk marked set from that time frame.
Thanks for posting that. My set is defa bit rougher than yours but very identical other than the sticker. That cardboard box is amazing!I have an sk marked set from that time frame. Looks about the same other than branding.
“fellow collector “ sounds way better than “fellow enabler”
I told him about the one in the NOS cardboard box, but I didn't know about the set in a metal box. If you posted that before I missed it. Definitely identical cousins.



That is an excellent decal and interior paint. Congratulations.
I was away last week and I am still catching up on old threads.
For @Debcrow - to qualify/clarify what Don is saying above, the "restrictions" in this case were not because of the composition. Carbon-manganese (AISI 1340) was not restricted. It was actually a popular replacement for the prewar double alloys (CM, CV), which were clearly restricted, prior to the New Emergency triple alloys becoming available. The "suspended" marking in this case is because it's a set. Limitation Order L-216 prevented mfgrs from selling entire sets of certain drive tools and wrenches. You could buy the pieces and assemble it yourself, but you could not buy entire sets. The WPB thought that would suppress the urge for distributors to stockpile too many tools, making a glut that could impact supplies for military use.
The WPB was highly invested in obfuscating any efforts for reconversion. Wartime production was 600% of prewar, and by the end of 1943 industries were lobbying for reconversion (the ability to sell to civilian markets). Immediately the military turned its surplus to a shortage on paper in order to remove the justification for reconversion. The politics between the military and civilian agencies such as the WPB and OWM were the unsung battle of the war, and make for interesting reading.I was away last week and I am still catching up on old threads.
For @Debcrow - to qualify/clarify what Don is saying above, the "restrictions" in this case were not because of the composition. Carbon-manganese (AISI 1340) was not restricted. It was actually a popular replacement for the prewar double alloys (CM, CV), which were clearly restricted, prior to the New Emergency triple alloys becoming available. The "suspended" marking in this case is because it's a set. Limitation Order L-216 prevented mfgrs from selling entire sets of certain drive tools and wrenches. You could buy the pieces and assemble it yourself, but you could not buy entire sets. The WPB thought that would suppress the urge for distributors to stockpile too many tools, making a glut that could impact supplies for military use.
I'm sure it is interesting reading. Was this published in a book or was this everyone at GJ piecing together through many documents?The WPB was highly invested in obfuscating any efforts for reconversion. Wartime production was 600% of prewar, and by the end of 1943 industries were lobbying for reconversion (the ability to sell to civilian markets). Immediately the military turned its surplus to a shortage on paper in order to remove the justification for reconversion. The politics between the military and civilian agencies such as the WPB and OWM were the unsung battle of the war, and make for interesting reading.
Actually from my own reading and research on World War 2. I read a lot, mostly history and biography, and war is history. So I have hundreds of books on especially American wars, but also many of the wars that helped form the twentieth century. My focus was not specifically on tool production during the war, per se, as it was on the to me very interesting politics of the war, and the efforts to stifle the move towards reconversion by military contractors who benefited from continued war is just a small ancillary part of that. I can give you references if you have the same interests, but probably best through private messages.I'm sure it is interesting reading. Was this published in a book or was this everyone at GJ piecing together through many documents?
Ricky, sure go ahead and send some recommendations through PM. I have an entire library of Civil War, WWI and WWII books, some very niche. One of the last things I read was a large volume published in the 50's that covered the entire foreign currency and transaction difficulties the Army faced during the war. I'm a finance officer in the guard so it was pretty interesting as a lot of the structure we still use today was established during wartime.Actually from my own reading and research on World War 2. I read a lot, mostly history and biography, and war is history. So I have hundreds of books on especially American wars, but also many of the wars that helped form the twentieth century. My focus was not specifically on tool production during the war, per se, as it was on the to me very interesting politics of the war, and the efforts to stifle the move towards reconversion by military contractors who benefited from continued war is just a small ancillary part of that. I can give you references if you have the same interests, but probably best through private messages.





I’ve never seen a 3/8 SK spinner before.
Is that a real PN, or did someone make that?

I’ve never seen a 3/8 SK spinner before.
I've only ever seen one 3/8 drive spinner - in any brand
Looks like it's the real deal.
There is a 3/8 drive spinner thread here somewhere