The OP has a legitimate question but as was said, it’s unfortunate it has devolved into ***** sizing. I think in order to properly answer the question, controlled scientific methods would need to be used to determine metallurgical makeup as well as strength of whatever tools we would be interested in. Otherwise it’s just anecdotal evidence as to those questions. Fit and finish however should be able to be determined by a number of users reaching a consensus.
I only use USA Craftsman but it’s a principle thing and not based on any head to head tests. Even if China made Cman was proven to be as good as or even better, I will still not consider buying the Chinese made stuff. Probably old fashioned but hey, it makes me feel good.
That is really all I am trying to determine. My intent is to determine, with facts, are the China CMAN really a bad tool, or is it the fact that it is a USA made tool gone China that makes them "****"?
I purchased a basic SAE and metric socket sets for the only purpose of comparing them and using them. They will be spares in my portable boxes only, I have no NEED for these and thus nothing to justify. I just want to know, are they actually poor quality tools or not?
My experience with Craftsman as a whole is good. Most all my CMAN tools are USA ones. I cannot fill a drawer of a portable boc with the China ones I have, but I can say that I see no difference in them, look, finish, feel, size, etc. But I Am limited to sockets (hex, etorx, torx, etc). I have no China CMAN ratchets, wrenches, etc. Thus my post here.... what do others see in their experience... do the tools break easy? As someone else here said, the "lobster claw" wrenches can be problematic based on the size (although from what I see, at least for the RP wrenches has been corrected). That is a great fact and a fair reason to call those tools a lesser quality.
I am not going to tell you what degrees I have, how many cars I own, the exact number of tools I can stack up without them falling over .... I am a non professional user, with a reasonable skill set and a reasonable selection of working tools. My question is resemblant of such. I also prefer to not bring COO into the conversation on its own merit. Unless someone can say that stamping "Made in USA" onto a tool automatically gives it a quality boost, to me it is just not a factor. Nice, sure, but what I want to know is if you removed all marking and used the tools, will that user actually realize a difference. I believe each specific tool may have a different answer to that question, which seems to me to provide a very logical reason to post such a thread and ask for facts, while providing the facts that I can contribute.
Sorry to those that believe all things not made USA is junk, not desirable or whatever. Everyone has the freedom to think and do and act how they choose as long as said choices do not infringe on the same freedom of others. I mean.... USA Craftsman in my experience will break before Blue Point which is made in Taiwan. So to me, COO is not an indicator of quality on its own merit.