For now!!Also, I control the electricity!

Are you sure?Also, I control the electricity!










Dan - great question. When I was at the aluminum supplier I asked the same question, because I was wondering. I had already asked the steel and plastics distributors about delivery. I went to three suppliers yesterday. The steel supplier charges $360, aluminum supplier uses a courier service that charges $30/100# ($30 x 15 = $450), and the GPO3 would have cost almost $1000 according to them to LTL the 4' x 8' sheet. It will be quite a while before it makes financial sense to have these materials delivered. I was also able to take care of some other client related work while in town.Does the material supplier charge too much to deliver? I think that having them deliver might be cheaper than an F250. That is unless they don't deliver to your neck of the woods.
![]()











Thankfully I haven’t made this kind of mistake too often. It’s always a trick when the engineer that makes the shop drawing uses different datums. Keeps me sharp I suppose.









At the client's shop doing some reverse engineering with the new Shining 3D Freescan Combo. The new scanner is really nice. It has three laser modes: 26 line laser, 7 line laser HD, and single line laser. The single line is how it gets into deep bores and features. The first step is placing and scanning the markers. The marker file is then used in the laser scan mode. The markers:
View attachment 1934442
The scan (you can see the three modes on the left):
The scan is meshed and then opened in Quick Surface (QS):
This is what we are working on:
We'll focus on the corner post in the left of that image:
Similar to last time I posted about this, the mesh is cut with a plane, and the mesh data is used as reference data on that plane to create a sketch:
The white dots are the scan data, the blue is the sketch. I just trace over the scan data using the tools in the sketch screen. I used a caliper to measure the material thickness. It's bang on 2mm. The offset tool is used to offset the outer lines, close the ends and we have the above sketch. The sketch is then extruded.
This is the extrusion with everything else hidden. Here the modeled corner post is with the reference sketch visible:
This alone is really powerful. To me, the REAL impact is the comparison tool.
This shows a heat map comparing the new solid body to the scan data. All that green at the top means we have a good model. It's within 0.1mm of the scan data. I didn't spend the time or energy to scan the whole post. I got the outside profile, and that's enough because it's a straight extrusion of that profile, at the material's thickness.
Thank you for the kind words of encouragement. I continue to be drawn to the GJ community. I really appreciate and enjoy the conversations, and all the things I’ve learned here. Again, thank you for following a long and contributing to the conversation!I have to say, it has been a pleasure following your journey, from the start, to where we are at right now. I am just a bit jealous, as I wish I could attack new projects and talents like you have! Thanks for sharing with us! Lots of hard work in this path you have shown us. Thanks again!

Austin- I avoid using the sticker markers directly whenever I can. They are a huge pain in the ***. The magnets are great. I use the inexpensive, not very strong tape/craft style magnets. Not the rare earth. I buy 200 1/2" dot magnets for about $10 on Amazon. I have 200 made up and I ordered another 600. It takes a LOT of markers to scan large objects.The magnetic markers are a great idea! I just used some of those sticker markers yesterday on a small part and they were surprisingly annoying to remove when I was done.
That's exactly what I was dealing with last weekend. It will definitely keep you on your toes when reading drawings. The time waste is the hard part for me. I don't sweat a little bit of material waste. I recently scrapped what would be about 4 sheets of material because of a dumb datum reading error. That hurts a little more. Agree 100% with you that the customer (their 3rd party engineer in my case) could really help themselves (and the process) by being consistent with this stuff.I make alot of parts for a customer where I will get 10+ drawings that all look identical but with different dimensions, then he will throw 1 in there that is the same type of part but the print looks totally different with different origins and with dimensions called out differently, like hole to hole vs all from one end, etc. Sometimes even a different tolerance level. Not a big deal until I am in a hurry and trying to keep it all straight. I have good customers and things go well most of the time, but there are sometimes where I think they could help themselves out by maintaining consistency of info.
Dan- the scanner technology is absolutely amazing! Learning how to do it is some of the most difficult learning I've done in a long while. As I start to get the hang of it... I'm hooked! SO much fun.Steven, I am amazed at what today's scanning technology can pick up. Nice work as always! And I will be following along as always.
![]()
What is that?
Steven, I missed that train as well. It certainly should have clicked for me, working at IBM on OS/2 software documentation. One of my departments helped video game companies get their games to run on OS/2. Spent a good part of my 4 years at America Online documenting the API for game companies so they could develop multi-player online games. As a consultant I had to have multiple PCs at home that would run Windows 3.1, Windows 95 and a Mac running the current Mac-OS. My laptop was running OS/2 so I spent a whole lot of time keeping all of them updated and running. Last thing on my mind was building a PC powerful enough to run games.Games never clicked for me.






The Hurco I was looking at had the same issue yours does and I know I don’t have the bandwidth to repair it.



