To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

hacksaws?

AntiqueBen

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Messages
1,438
Just found this ad in a 1947 Millers Falls catalog on the no. 84 hacksaw.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241002-155042~2.png
    Screenshot_20241002-155042~2.png
    620.1 KB · Views: 32
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

B Halverson

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2024
Messages
304
This monster, shown next to a standard size hacksaw for comparison, was made to cut railroad rails in half out in the field back in the day before there were a lot of power tools to do it, and is called a "rail saw". They were in the catalogs of common saw manufacturers, this one was made by Atkins and was once owned by the Erie Railroad. Some were sold with a handle on each end.

rail saw comparison.jpg

rail saw erie RR.jpg

rail saw stamp.jpg
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,456
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Check out that unique tensioning mechanism.
Patented (1,382,448) in 1921 by G.H. Wilkins of Greenfield, Mass. As I said in the K-D thread when I posted my example there, I have not been able to determine if K-D licensed it or bought him out, but they used his design until 1947. I also admire the use of the large "K-D" raised lettering as a handle grip pattern. It appears in the 1934 and the 1942 catalogs, but is replaced by a similar but newer convertible design, patented by Kulp in 1946, in the 1948 catalog. I posted photos of both the early and later models together in the K-D thread, linked here. @tombell572 has one of the early models as well. His is posted in this thread. See #126.
 

B Halverson

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2024
Messages
304
KD hacksaw z.jpg

KD hacksaw y.jpg

KD hacksaw x.jpg
Was in the terribly cluttered basement today trying to get through a rainy day and spied this in a pile of tool rubble. I wondered if it might be a K-D item and that is what it turned out to be once I got it closer to my eyes. An interesting design, but what struck me was that it was marked "Patent applied for", which means it may be an earlier example of it's type. I shot these photos of it and back into the basement it went.
 

B Halverson

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2024
Messages
304
What is probably one of Miller's Falls oldest running hacksaws, the "No.6". I picked up three examples so far over the years, each a bit different, but apparently it was in production for many decades so surely went through many changes. The patent drawing gotten from Vintage Machinery dotorg has the note that known examples do not match the patent drawings, but I am guessing that originally they did, but the saws were quickly and constantly updated. The unique thing about the saws may be the notches in the frame of the saw to let it fit blades of many different lengths. One example I have is faintly marked with the November 10th, 1885 patent date, the other two examples show their younger age with cheaper-to-manufacture parts and features compared to the oldest example.

millers falls 6 a.jpg

millers falls 6 c.jpg

millers falls 6 b.jpg

millers falls 6 d.jpg
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,456
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
An interesting design, but what struck me was that it was marked "Patent applied for", which means it may be an earlier example of its type.
No "may be" about it, it was made between Sep 24, 1946, when K-D submitted their patent application, and Nov 21, 1950, when it was granted. They first show up in the 1948 catalog. I posted an example with the patent (2531135) stamped on it, patent excerpts, and K-D catalog excerpts back in 2022, linked here. Note that it has the same model number as the older K-D convertible hacksaw frame, with a different adjusting mechanism, that you just posted back on October 9, in post #406, just a few posts above. If you're interested in further information, in reply to that October 9 post (#407, just a few posts above), where I gave you information (patents, catalog excerpts, etc) on the c. 1921-1946 model, I mentioned the 1947 replacement model, I mentioned that I owned both of them, and I posted a link to more info and photos of them both together.
 

B Halverson

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2024
Messages
304
Note that it has the same model number as the older K-D convertible hacksaw frame, with a different adjusting mechanism, that you just posted back on October 9, in post #406, just a few posts above.

It is interesting that both variants with the same patent number do both use screws bearing on the main frame to tension the blade, they just moved the screw from the top to the bottom on the later one, and they dropped the nice ruler that was stamped into the frame. I can see how the later version might be better in the respect that it does not have the adjuster on top to catch on things in tight places, but it's small diameter adjuster seems to me as if it would take more effort to operate than the adjusters on most common hacksaws. I don't think I ever had to use either of these saws, so I will have to put that on my to-do list. I like that old saws usually attract zero interest at estate and garage sales, so they can usually be had for less than a song-and-dance.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,456
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
It is interesting that both variants with the same patent number do both use screws bearing on the main frame to tension the blade, they just moved the screw from the top to the bottom on the later one, and they dropped the nice ruler that was stamped into the frame.
Agreed. More interesting still that Kulp did not own the first patent. They were a licensee. So they had a few (17) years to think about it. :)
I can see how the later version might be better in the respect that it does not have the adjuster on top to catch on things in tight places, but it's small diameter adjuster seems to me as if it would take more effort to operate than the adjusters on most common hacksaws.
Neither one tickles the 'simple but elegant' funny bone in this old engineer's evaluative heart. But complex tools, even overly sophisticated, often have more appeal as collectibles, and that's true of these for me.
I like that old saws usually attract zero interest at estate and garage sales, so they can usually be had for less than a song-and-dance.
Or "for peanuts," as I like to say, which is why I prefer flea markets.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,456
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
As I was saying on the Screwdrivers thread, I've been on a research binge, and in the process of reading very early (c. 1950, 1951) issues of PS: The Preventive Maintenance Monthly magazine, I ran across a series of these recurring "Hand Tool Clinic" features. This one is pretty funny.

Hand Tool Clinic Hacksaw Frames August 1951 PS Magazine.jpg

You can see the others in the Pliers and Screwdrivers threads.

If you're not familiar with PS, the US Army recruited a young cartoonist named Will Eisner (The Spirit, Blackhawk, others) into the Ordnance Dept during WWII, and from Aberdeen Proving Grounds, where all vehicular maintenance and training was HQ'd, he led a team as a warrant officer in making preventive maintenance more enjoyable (and more effective!) to mechanics by publishing mimeographed flyers in cartoon form, featuring his loveable loser character, Joe Dope. During WWII, they were published in Army Motors, but in 1950, Joe, Connie Rodd (pinup model in uniform), and Half-Mast McCannick (letter columnist), they became their own publication as a "postscript" (hence the name). Eisner would go on to become one of the most famous and influential cartoonists in history, including credit for the very first "graphic novel" in 1978. The Eisner Award is the highest annual honor in comics, and it's given at the Eisner Comic Books Hall of Fame.
 

Attachments

  • Cover M38 Jeep October 1951 PS Magazine.jpg
    Cover M38 Jeep October 1951 PS Magazine.jpg
    268.3 KB · Views: 12

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670
Anybody know this company? I just bought a hacksaw that is marked "S&I Co Pat Pend Springfield MA". I bought it because I also have two expansive bits marked "S&I Co". The expansive bits are identical to ones that James Swan made. Internet search came up with a "S.I. Never-Break" wrench but no other information. I've also searched DataMP.org, Alloy Artifacts, and the book American Wrench Makers 1830-1930. Nothing. The hacksaw has an interesting feature for adjusting the frame to different sizes using a simple pin/hole design.

Here are some pictures. Any help is appreciated.

Hacksaw 1.jpg

Hacksaw 2.jpg

Hacksaw 3.jpg

S&I Expansive 2.jpg

S&I Expansive 3.jpg
 

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,464
Location
Tacoma, Washington
July 10 1907 "Hardware"
"Springfield, Mass.—The S. & I. Co. recently erected and equipped a plant for the manufacture of metal specialties to order,
also stampings, punches, dies and special tools, and it is now in complete operation."
 

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670
July 10 1907 "Hardware"
"Springfield, Mass.—The S. & I. Co. recently erected and equipped a plant for the manufacture of metal specialties to order,
also stampings, punches, dies and special tools, and it is now in complete operation."
Very interesting. Thanks. Wonder who S&I were?
 

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,464
Location
Tacoma, Washington
^ The question remains unanswered until such time as some snippet out of a contemporary magazine or trade journal turns up more evidence.
It's a very slow process picking through them one page at a time looking for clues.
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,058
Location
SF Bay Area
Well, just to stir **** into the fire, I used USPTO to search for patents for hacksaw and Springfield.

The specific piece i am looking at is the double split on the frame back to match Eric's pic, here are some is an option (1) this is from 1912-04-16


This patent is not in DATAMP

Trying to go back from the address of 55-57 Governor

gives me a Chilton hit, and its still only S&I

 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670
Well, just to stir **** into the fire, I used USPTO to search for patents for hacksaw and Springfield.

The specific piece i am looking at is the double split on the frame back to match Eric's pic, here are some is an option (1) this is from 1912-04-16


This patent is not in DATAMP

Trying to go back from the address of 55-57 Governor

gives me a Chilton hit, and its still only S&I

Thanks. Sometimes all hacksaw look similar. I see features in the patent but not how the frame locks into place. We all know sometimes the item doesn't always match the patent. While it matches the Springfield MA. the patent was assigned to somebody else, not S&I.

I did find a ad showing they made a Never-Break screwdriver.

Screenshot_31-12-2024_20316_babel.hathitrust.org.jpeg
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,058
Location
SF Bay Area
And just to further muddy the waters, S & I also made ice picks, at 53 Governor St. In 1915. A new house was built at this address in 1925,



1735703844464.png


Let’s go to 1911, hmm, might be an earlier patent, does this break 2x on the back.


1735704412795.png
 
Last edited:

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,058
Location
SF Bay Area
July 10 1907 "Hardware"
"Springfield, Mass.—The S. & I. Co. recently erected and equipped a plant for the manufacture of metal specialties to order,
also stampings, punches, dies and special tools, and it is now in complete operation."

Very interesting. Thanks. Wonder who S&I were?

^ The question remains unanswered until such time as some snippet out of a contemporary magazine or trade journal turns up more evidence.
It's a very slow process picking through them one page at a time looking for clues.
1735709297520.png

P. S. Stauffer and R. T. Ives

And I swear I’ve looked this up before, just don’t know where I posted it, and for who.


And yeah, we’re having a Rockin’ New Years Eve here, I just woke from a nap to continue this search, finding volume Pt. 4
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,058
Location
SF Bay Area

Attachments

  • 1735710107190.png
    1735710107190.png
    77.7 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,058
Location
SF Bay Area
Last edited:

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,464
Location
Tacoma, Washington
Rutherford Coffron
b. Mar 17 1890 Washington DC
d. Aug 3 1924 Detroit, MI

patents
US 990839 May 2 1911
GB 191109138A (with Arthur Cowsill) Jun 6 1911

Arthur Cowsill was a builder in Washington DC.

I'm not seeing the connection to Stauffer or Ives here. :headscrat
 

Attachments

  • patent GB 191109138A Apr 12 1911 R. Coffron & A. Cowsill.jpg
    patent GB 191109138A Apr 12 1911 R. Coffron & A. Cowsill.jpg
    143.3 KB · Views: 6

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670
Rutherford Coffron
b. Mar 17 1890 Washington DC
d. Aug 3 1924 Detroit, MI

patents
US 990839 May 2 1911
GB 191109138A (with Arthur Cowsill) Jun 6 1911

Arthur Cowsill was a builder in Washington DC.

I'm not seeing the connection to Stauffer or Ives here. :headscrat
I'm thinking that S&I were not the owners of the patents, and they were simply a small manufacturer that were willing to produce for others. Their line is a hodgepodge of items. No real focus. There is no evidence so far that they relocated before the house was built on their property in 1925. So thinking they were only in business from about 1906 up to 1925. Doesn't sound long, less than twenty years, but that is still a long time. Perhaps their building burned down or something? I contacted the Springfield Historical Society asking for help, but not holding my breath.
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,058
Location
SF Bay Area
. There is no evidence so far that they relocated before the house was built on their property in 1925. So thinking they were only in business from about 1906 up to 1925. Doesn't sound long, less than twenty years, but that is still a long time. Perhaps their building burned down or something?.
In poking around for addresses, seems like in 1920 someone was at one of the three (53-55-57) in that year.

I was gonna poke into the S&I years of operation later, but would love for someone else to go down that rabbit hole.
 
Last edited:

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
28,464
Location
Tacoma, Washington
^ That's as far as I have time to chase it, because I am leaving in a couple hours. I have "Coffron" in a completely separate folder until such time as somebody finds some connection there, which I am just not finding anywhere.
new updated list just uploaded Wed Jan 01 12:37:15 2025
(just in case some idiot kills me on the highway)

Have to go cook dinner for Mom. She apparently bought a mess of oysters and doesn't trust anyone else to cook them properly. ;)
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,058
Location
SF Bay Area
In poking around for addresses, seems like in 1920 someone was at one of the three (53-55-57) in that year.

I was gonna poke into the S&I years of operation later, but would love for someone else to go down that rabbit hole.
Just a quick glance at google books shows them 1908 - 18, so plus or minus a year or so is a good guess.


From 1908
1735766243284.png
 
Last edited:

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670
In poking around for addresses, seems like in 1920 someone was at one of the three (53-55-57) in that year.

I was gonna poke into the S&I years of operation later, but would love for someone else to go down that rabbit hole.

Just a quick glance at google books shows them 1908 - 18, so plus or minus a year or so is a good guess.


From 1908
1735766243284.png
My searches so far dealing with the men's names seems to indicate that Ives may have died in 1913. I may have looked at the wrong Ives though, there were a lot of them. I did find a hacksaw for sale that I bought that looks similar to the top of the frame in the Coffron patent. It does not have the fancy clamp, just the holes and pins that match. It has some markings, but will need to receive it and clean it up to maybe read.

Here are pictures:

Coffron 2.png

Coffron 1.jpg

It does seems to match the ad shown earlier for S&I.
 

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670
Comparisons of the two different frame tops. They look very similar except the first one (S&I) has one pivot point at each end and the Coffron has an extra pin at each end. Even same number of holes.

Hacksaw 3.jpg

Coffron 3.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Coffron 2.png
    Coffron 2.png
    822 KB · Views: 6

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
670
Was looking at my Clemson Star #20 hacksaw and comparing it to the patent. Mine is similar, but the patent shows a knob sticking out at the lever pivot and mine doesn't have (#30 on patent). In addition, where the lever pivots the patent shows short plates for the pivot and mine are long. The patent indicates that the pivot pin can be removed using the knob. What I discovered was that the long plates on mine are actually springs. The pin is attached to just one side, the other side has a slightly larger hole. It's possible to spread the plates apart and remove the lever. The frame can then be pulled out and another position hole is there. This allows either a 10" or 12" blade to be used.
Guessing they changed the design to reduce the chances of losing the pin. My lever does have the 2308354 patent on it.

Star 0.jpg

Star 1.jpg

Star 2.jpg

Star 3.jpg

Star 4.jpg

Star 5.jpg
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom