Thanks to the name I found an earlier post that has lots of information.@Steven 33 posted a pair on Nov20 but the photos only show one side.
Neither. Can't take apart but the following post shows its Palmers patent 2152563 (1939). Its a rounded rectangle.
If you looked at my chart you probably saw that I added the one I think of as rope-y, Don, but not the shiny geometric one. Do you know when they were made? I can try to find them in a catalog later, but I am hoping you (or someone else) may know or do the legwork.Wilde...[ ]...handle patterns
I am tempted to make a joke about not wanting to be in your head, but I'll go with, "Great minds think alike!" instead.That is exactly the picture I had in my head when I typed that comment.
Good point. Agreed.Not sure you really need to do that, because right about 1960-1965 we saw the introduction of vinyl-dipped handles. "Handle patterns" kind of became a thing of the past at that point.
True. What I was referring to, though, was the considerable amount of interest in European pliers right here on the thread. Germany, England, etc. I'm just saying flat out that someone else can take that on.Considering that the second-hand market is literally glutted with examples from Western Germany made post WWII, yes - those persistent inquiries about that massive amount of production will continue.
Where's that 'Both-hands-clapped-over-my-ears-going-'Na-na-na-na-na-I-can't-hear-you'!' emoji when you need it?!we really need something like that for the logos
Unmarked, but has distinctive grips that should permit a more knowledgeable person to identify:
Grips:
This goes way back, and you may already have figured this out yourself, but they've been subsequently identified as Wilde, or at least they appear on Wilde-marked pliers. This is the pattern I was asking Don to track down to a date in post #1,326 just above.I'm moderately surprised that you've not seen that pattern before, Lugz. I was thinking you'd be among the folks who'd seen a number of them. That suggests they're rather rare, although that probably doesn't imply any great $ value, which is not of much interest to me anyway...[ ]...I like the "Open Books" description.

^ It looks to me like our own @Eric Brown is determined to try to figure that part out. Between Witherby and Spiegel and Oxwall and the others, I find it all confusing as hell, and I struggle with the German language, although I do know the distinction between "zangen" and "zange".True. What I was referring to, though, was the considerable amount of interest in European pliers right here on the thread. Germany, England, etc. I'm just saying flat out that someone else can take that on.
You and me both. Still waiting for somebody to step up to the plate and take that one on. The folder is now up to almos 600 files.Where's that 'Both-hands-clapped-over-my-ears-going-'Na-na-na-na-na-I-can't-hear-you'!' emoji when you need it?!
Appreciate your effort and the input of others to make Pliers almost important . . . as the Thread approaches its 2 year anniversary. If it was a marriage, of which I have had way too many, it'd be Cotton.'Both-hands-clapped-over-my-ears-going-'Na-na-na-na-na-I-can't-hear-you'!'
Since I'm a curious person and others seemed interest, decided to take apart. Guess what. It's not a rivet but a nut/bolt with a copper thrust washer. Flattened the peened end and then used vee jaws to clamp the ends and unscrew. The center looks more like a rectangle with rounded ends. Enjoy.I know it's riveted and can't be easily disassembled. I don't think you are following me. move it on the sliding slot and show what can be seen at each end.... and/or an angled shot up the groove.

The center looks more like a rectangle with rounded ends.
What I discovered was that there isn’t much of a selection of Wilde catalogs available. The closest in appearance was in the ‘85 catalog. Unfortunately my smooth jaw pliers weren’t shown and the catalog images mostly hinted at the handle pattern. Pretty inconclusiveIf you looked at my chart you probably saw that I added the one I think of as rope-y, Don, but not the shiny geometric one. Do you know when they were made? I can try to find them in a catalog later, but I am hoping you (or someone else) may know or do the legwork.


The bottom example is raised, not depressed diamonds, and has a border - IDK.I'm working on a Page 2 of the handles chart. One of the things I am running into is attribution. I don't want to and should not be the sole arbiter. Page 1 was easy. They are the most prominent pliers makers with the most distinctive grip pattern handles and maybe some mid-majors, but also with distinctive handles, and therefore, there was very little to nothing to vet or discuss. That might get trickier with the next batch.
I am struggling with one brand already. Without naming it, based only on grip pattern, who would you say made these pliers?
(EDIT: I am withholding who I think it is, but this is not a stump-the-chump question. I want to see what others say in the blind.)
![]()
This is waaaay off the pliers topic here, but this is actually in the 'juice/squeeze?' question category for me. It crosses over into my post just upthread about the differences between Mega tool Type threads (multitudes of brands, subtypes, participants, but quickly everchanging and interlaced topics, difficult to follow, navigate, find things, maintain cohesion and continuity, etc) and hyper focused tool Brand threads, which tend to be much more proficient. For example, I have a chart showing a very detailed Bonney logo progression in the Bonney thread. Similar references for Plomb, Williams, Blackhawk, etc, in their respective threads. Could that all be condensed and merged? Yes. But, as tantalizing as it may seem, as easily as it can be visualized, the scale of an industry wide logo reference could quickly reach a law of diminishing returns threshold.Still waiting for somebody to step up to the plate and take that one on. The folder is now up to almost 600 files
Thanks. I will just place it in the nebulous 'Later' column.What I discovered was that there isn’t much of a selection of Wilde catalogs available. The closest in appearance was in the ‘85 catalog.
Thanks for helping, LS. All of them are branded Barcalo. But without the branding, I would identify them ALL as early J.P. Danielson.The other three look like JP Danielson to me, but I can see a resemblance to Barcalo,
I have early Crescent pliers with the checkered-diamond pattern. They don't usually have left and right borders....and early (pre- or non-circle-dot) Crescent (MoToRKit).
Agreed. Pexto is in this category, too. Maybe the best approach is to make a separate area on Page 2, or its own Page 3, where we plot them all and all the potential mfgrs.Maybe there are some patterns that just have to be considered too generic to definitively indicate a single OEM.
Personally, I would use a list like this to track down possible matches. In that case, having similar patterns grouped together would make sense. I can also see where somebody is trying to complete a collection and so grouping by maker would be better. So I will go out on a limb here and suggest there be one master list in the mega tool list and separate lists for each of the maker threads. I also can see where this would be asking a lot out of anybody. Probably just a dream.This is waaaay off the pliers topic here, but this is actually in the 'juice/squeeze?' question category for me. It crosses over into my post just upthread about the differences between Mega tool Type threads (multitudes of brands, subtypes, participants, but quickly everchanging and interlaced topics, difficult to follow, navigate, find things, maintain cohesion and continuity, etc) and hyper focused tool Brand threads, which tend to be much more proficient. For example, I have a chart showing a very detailed Bonney logo progression in the Bonney thread. Similar references for Plomb, Williams, Blackhawk, etc, in their respective threads. Could that all be condensed and merged? Yes. But, as tantalizing as it may seem, as easily as it can be visualized, the scale of an industry wide logo reference could quickly reach a law of diminishing returns threshold.
We may (probably?) have drastically different ideas about the objective. IF I was creating this kind of Infographic, it would not be one long A-Z, but several A-Z's, in categories: Major (maybe 35 max), Mid-Major (50-ish), Minor (50-ish), Obscure But Notable (50-ish), and Other (TBD). Or something like that. Geared toward probability of need and use, not encyclopedic exhaustiveness.
Otherwise, "ET" (not that "ET"), Edward Tufte, my former mentor (see bookshelf), would have a conniption.![]()
Some Threads draw people out who might have been Lurking when they see that they "know enough about that pair of pliers over there that belonged to my grand uncle" to contribute to a very general conversation. The "Welcomes" to those new people along with encouragement and observations from so many knowledgeable accumulators of old stuff (even when they've only a vague idea of what it is . . . unless it's a Saw Set of course) have probably led many people to be active members of this Forum.quickly everchanging and interlaced topics, difficult to follow, navigate, find things, maintain cohesion and continuity, etc)
Nah. Said it cuz I know how I lurked for a long time and how it felt to finally say something and now I know how to distinguish Saw Sets from . . . other things.^ Hopefully you didn't read anything critical into that, Ed.
You have three years to find a pair of wooden fuze pullers by 2028 for the 5th anniversary....as the Thread approaches its 2 year anniversary. If it was a marriage, of which I have had way too many, it'd be Cotton.
It seems that it often happens that when an oddball tool is shown, another is not far behind. I found this pair at today’s estate sale.Thanks. @LesserSon nailed it. Branded "GITTATIT" (in the same mode as but preceding 'Git 'er done!' by 100 years!) There are a few on the H.D. Smith thread and now a fourth here for me to be so happy for you guys about.
![]()
Here's one of the crisper markings...
![]()



Oh woow, these handles are really beautiful!
It's semi legible in person with the right light and angle, but difficult to get a good picture. Maybe I'll try again. I do have probably 12 or so verified tools from them from the same lot, and I'm not quite sure who else it could be but, I wouldn't say I'm 100% convinced yet either. Once I find a way to sort through everything I'll probably revisit it.Awesome. If I am coming off like a nabob of negativity, let me declare that I sure hope it can be legibly ID'ed! I'm just re-emphasizing that unlike many other cases where we have many known examples by known mfgrs with many known characteristics (profile, grip pattern, etc) that can be identified even without a legible marking, Stevens would not be the case.
Posted already in another thread but here's a carbon scraper with the Stevens marking. I also have those no. 75 pliers But I haven't had a chance to clean up yet.
Those look similar to these kind ofUnusual German pliers. They are marked "Reade Work", "Germany" and "PAT APLD FOR". There is also a "5" on both sides. Has the screwdriver and punch handle ends. The unusual feature is at the nose end. It has been angled down with a couple of small 1/8" posts sticking up that have a grooved gripping surface. Any ideas?
![]()
It's semi legible in person with the right light and angle, but difficult to get a good picture.
I was skipping through the thread looking for various things and came upon this old exchange.
This goes way back, and you may already have figured this out yourself, but they've been subsequently identified as Wilde, or at least they appear on Wilde-marked pliers. This is the pattern I was asking Don to track down to a date in post #1,326 just above.



Indestro 2097A 8-inch slip-joint pliers.
Agreed!Oh woow, these handles are really beautiful!
Tekton PGA36310 10-inch bla bla bla
Interesting design. They seem bla bla bla
Don't make me get the "This is the Vintage Tools Discussion Forum" hammer out!I haven’t handled any of that type from Tekton, but I bla bla bla