To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Plomb tool picture thread - show your stuff!

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

rustyzman

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2015
Messages
772
Location
Chicagoland
What's interesting to me is how the dimples reveal what I believe to be their manual placement with a punch. I've looked at all the early 4875's on this thread that I could find and they're all in slightly different positions. Some are higher up. Some, like that one, are so close to the edge it barely made it.
Perhaps a bit of proof you could be correct. The specific tool certainly exists.
Model 4D, Indenting Hand Punch on page 3.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,500
Location
Northern California
I try to look really carefully at the Ford V8 rod nut sockets before bidding on them. I’ve seen a couple of
S-K ones that were cracked. The 6 point sockets are a little more durable than the 12 point ones. IMG_3398.jpegIMG_3397.jpeg
S-K versionIMG_8953.jpegIMG_8954.jpegIMG_8955.jpegIMG_9278.jpeg
Duro versionIMG_0758.jpegIMG_0759.jpeg
Cracked S-K 12 pointer.
IMG_0761.pngEdit****A Thorsen version I spotted in with the Thorsen sockets today. IMG_4029.jpeg
-Don
 
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,487
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
The old "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me," saying was in play when I found this teeny tiny feeler gauge No. 000D at the flea market yesterday.

20240405_172456.jpg
20240405_172437.jpg

Some of you may recall that I had found and posted a #000K a few years ago, linked here, and couldn't find them in any early, pre-1934, "PLOMB" (with an "O") LA era catalogs. Enlightened by @Provincial, they are not early, but later, despite the "O". As I opined at the time, almost certainly because of a supplier/OEM not as diligent as they were about their branding. With the "LOS ANGELES" marking, that inconceivably late "O" makes these seem even more deceptively early, of course.

Here they are now together.

20240406_091533.jpg

There aren't too many of these model number 000-x series gauges on the thread. A search on the model numbers (000A through 000K) reveals one posted way back in 2012 by our OP...
Feeler gauges. Both #000D. Proto on the top, Plomb on the bottom...
...who was just as honestly misled by the branding as I was...
...with round 'O' which would seem to indicate pre-1934 manufacture.
A more general search on "feeler" led me to this unidentified reference...
...early feeler gauges...
...that on closer inspection of the photo, is, I believe, another 000D.

So far, unless I am mistaken, his, the OP's, and mine are the only 000D's posted. Maybe @mustangSR70 will kindly confirm that. In fact, I'm interested in seeing if it's marked "No. 000D" or "#000D." The "No." style marking seems to be earlier than the "#" style marking.

The only other 000-x series gauge I can find (identified explicitly by model number or as a "feeler" in the text, which is the only way the search engine will ever pick it up) belongs to @Ricky Joe, who has a PLOMB "No. 000E", posted earlier this year, here.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,487
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
These first show up during the late war to late 40's in Catalog 19-R series (FIRST through FOURTH PRINTINGS, and REPRINT). But only model numbers 000A to 000E.

Cat 19R excerpt.jpg

They added the 000K (bent wire type) sometime before 1948, in Catalog No. 4820.

Cat 4820.jpg
 

Smokeshow69

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
8,366
Location
Pacific Northwest
My plomb pickups from the swap meet today. I found a historically low (for me) amount of plomb this year but what I missed in plomb, I made up for in Proto. See that thread for more on that! But I'm stoked on what I found ( and have yet to find)....

Paschall 1308! Definetly my favorite find
1210 smooth wrench
nice 3/8 long chrome extension
cad plated wobble
deep 1/2 socket....really rough and cant see the size yet
war finish 3/4 socket and 2 small wrenches

While I was walking around I found and bought 2 proto mfd tool boards. While talking to the seller and his wife, he asked me, do you like tool boards. He might as well of asked if the sky was blue :). I told him I'm only interested in plomb or proto tool boards. He said he is getting to the point of selling his collection. He told me a number of years ago in the 90's he bought 4 plomb tool boards for $5 each and that he was going to be selling them in the next year. I told him to please keep my phone number and call me when he gets close to selling. Can't wait to see what sort of goodies this old timer has rat holed. He is an old Ford guy so he probably has an insanely cool garage!
IMG_9664.jpegIMG_9665.jpeg
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,487
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
I could not find much info on it but it is a rare one for sure.
We've seen a few examples and talked about the rare PLVMB pebble field wrenches before (and if you search this thread on "pebble field", you will find them) without much definitive headway.

It's not only the pebble fields that are befuddling about these wrenches. It's easy enough to imagine a sequence from PLVMB full pebble panel to PLVMB pebble size fields only to Dual-Marked PLVMB-PRVTV pebble size fields only to PRVTV pebble size fields only. In such a sequence, your wrenches would be very late PLVMB pebble size fields, perhaps just before January 1949, when Plomb Tool Company started dual-marking tools. But your wrenches are MADE IN USA. Consensus is they made that switch in early 1947 and we have plenty of PLMVB full pebble panel wrenches that are already marked MFD. IN USA.

These PLVMB wrenches are real curve balls, seemingly much later (late 1948-ish) - with the pebble size fields, and yet earlier (1946-ish) - with the MADE IN USA marking!

Here's another layer of analysis...

Notice that neither of them has the tell-tale electroplating rack burn marks that @z28lsc 's 3031 DOE dual-ie is conveniently showing in his photo. The earliest we can possibly see those burn marks on PLVMB wrenches (and there will be a third mark dead center between those two on the flip side) is when the Plomb Tool Co applied for the patent for the rack, which was December 1947. Note, significantly, that we have seen the notorious marks on plenty of PLVMB full pebble panel MFD IN USA wrenches. Nothing escaped "the rack" after it was introduced. (If this is new to you, click here for more.)

That means your wrenches were almost assuredly made before December 1947. And because of the MADE marking, very plausibly in 1946.

One theory (and I can't remember who to attribute it to..., but I don't recall it being mine...) is that Plomb was experimenting with pebbling before they went full panel.

This is a first cup of coffee post and I reserve the right for second, third, and fourth cup updates.
 
Last edited:

mritchie77

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 8, 2020
Messages
365
Location
Cottonwood Shores, TX
I am now the proud owner of two of these fairly rare pickle forks. I can’t find the pebble one listed except in the dual marked catalog. The red paint had to go!IMG_3858.jpegIMG_3859.jpeg
-Don

Don, those look great! I missed out on one a couple of years ago and wish I would have picked it up. Don't see them often at all.
The old "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me," saying was in play when I found this teeny tiny feeler gauge No. 000D at the flea market yesterday.


20240405_172437.jpg

Some of you may recall that I had found and posted a #000K a few years ago, linked here, and couldn't find them in any early, pre-1934, "PLOMB" (with an "O") LA era catalogs. Enlightened by @Provincial, they are not early, but later, despite the "O". As I opined at the time, almost certainly because of a supplier/OEM not as diligent as they were about their branding. With the "LOS ANGELES" marking, that inconceivably late "O" makes these seem even more deceptively early, of course.

Here they are now together.

20240406_091533.jpg

There aren't too many of these model number 000-x series gauges on the thread. A search on the model numbers (000A through 000K) reveals one posted way back in 2012 by our OP...

...who was just as honestly misled by the branding as I was...

A more general search on "feeler" led me to this unidentified reference...

...that on closer inspection of the photo, is, I believe, another 000D.

So far, unless I am mistaken, his, the OP's, and mine are the only 000D's posted. Maybe @mustangSR70 will kindly confirm that. In fact, I'm interested in seeing if it's marked "No. 000D" or "#000D." The "No." style marking seems to be earlier than the "#" style marking.

The only other 000-x series gauge I can find (identified explicitly by model number or as a "feeler" in the text, which is the only way the search engine will ever pick it up) belongs to @Ricky Joe, who has a PLOMB "No. 000E", posted earlier this year, here.
You worry me. 000A is one of the last items needed to complete my '47 Veterans set, and they've so far appeared to be unobtanium. Only one has come up for sale online in the last two years and it was a 000D model. Eventually, I'll convince someone to sell me theirs! LOL
 

mritchie77

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 8, 2020
Messages
365
Location
Cottonwood Shores, TX
I have never seen a No. 000A "in the steel", so to speak, or even in a photo, only the rendering in the catalogs. If I ever find one, it's yours, FREE of charge or trade, for the yeoman's work you did on the wartime newsletters!

Thanks! What I'll probably "settle" for is any set in a 000C holder. (see reasoning below)

Just to add some information since I don't think it's been put in this thread.

The Plomb 000A feeler gauges (along with the 000AA, B, and BB) used the 000C holder, which I don't believe was generally marked 000C because it was used for all those sets (or could be purchased separately if you were buying individual blades for a custom set).

The above quote was pulled from a Facebook post I made in 2022 asking for a survey of Plomb feeler gauge owners. The reasoning was that one holder was used for multiple different sets with different blade counts with a single default holder.

000A - 9 piece single size
000AA - complete 25 piece single size
000B - 4 step cut pieces
000BB - complete 8 step cut pieces
 

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,137
Location
The Badlands
Whats would be interesting is some careful comparisons between the different pebble variants, and the actual structure of the wrench + other markings,

I don't believe all the wrenches were necessarily made in the same plant, and thereby different tool makers making the dies. Different plants may have been given some latitude, for what to do, for what they did, or possibly even direction (many were different companies before Plomb acquisitions). why a "directed option? So they could tell if they had production issues one to another.

All during the war it was "Crank stuff out and get it out the door" I think it would take time, even years, for that attitude to shift to "OMG! plant one has a tiny difference for the same tool from Plant 2!"
 

z28lsc

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
Messages
200
Location
Gardena CA
We've seen a few examples and talked about the rare PLVMB pebble field wrenches before (and if you search this thread on "pebble field", you will find them) without much definitive headway.

It's not only the pebble fields that are befuddling about these wrenches. It's easy enough to imagine a sequence from PLVMB full pebble panel to PLVMB pebble size fields only to Dual-Marked PLVMB-PRVTV pebble size fields only to PRVTV pebble size fields only. In such a sequence, your wrenches would be very late PLVMB pebble size fields, perhaps just before January 1949, when Plomb Tool Company started dual-marking tools. But your wrenches are MADE IN USA. Consensus is they made that switch in early 1947 and we have plenty of PLMVB full pebble panel wrenches that are already marked MFD. IN USA.

These PLVMB wrenches are real curve balls, seemingly much later (late 1948-ish) - with the pebble size fields, and yet earlier (1946-ish) - with the MADE IN USA marking!

Here's another layer of analysis...

Notice that neither of them has the tell-tale electroplating rack burn marks that @z28lsc 's 3031 DOE dual-ie is conveniently showing in his photo. The earliest we can possibly see those burn marks on PLVMB wrenches (and there will be a third mark dead center between those two on the flip side) is when the Plomb Tool Co applied for the patent for the rack, which was December 1947. Note, significantly, that we have seen the notorious marks on plenty of PLVMB full pebble panel MFD IN USA wrenches. Nothing escaped "the rack" after it was introduced. (If this is new to you, click here for more.)

That means your wrenches were almost assuredly made before December 1947. And because of the MADE marking, very plausibly in 1946.

One theory (and I can't remember who to attribute it to..., but I don't recall it being mine...) is that Plomb was experimenting with pebbling before they went full panel.

This is a first cup of coffee post and I reserve the right for second, third, and fourth cup updates.
Thank you for the info. This wrench had me scratching my head for a while And about the the plating I don't think is cadmium. I been wanting to polish it a bit since the plating is almost gone.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom