Irish Mike
Well-known member
And the others in the toolbox.
Dan, I didn't know you were a Plomb fanatic. We'll have to get together for some tradin'......I'll post some pics later.....
And the others in the toolbox.
Oooo that is a nice piece. 9/32 or 1/4 drive?My newest piece.
Oooo that is a nice piece. 9/32 or 1/4 drive?
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Lucky basterd! I have never held one in my hand.Roy, it’s a 9/32 drive.
My newest piece.
I have two of those, but I can't figure out the usage. In one position it free floats, and in the other it is like a spin handle.
I have two of those,
Please tell me you mean metal handled spinners with the dual use extension feature, generically! The Plomb WF-6 9/32-inch drive spinner is an extremely rare bird. Most Plomb collectors I know don't have one, and most Plomb WF collections are commonly missing it.I also have the Williams version of the spinner.
Here's one of mine, a 3/4" drive ratchet. I got this for free at an estate sale because the selector switch and cam were missing. I told the guy I'd take it if he was going to throw it away and he said OK. I bought a Proto rebuild kit and installed the missing parts today. It's not mint but it works once again so I'm happy with that. Oh, it's marked Plvmb on one side and Proto on the reverse.
Thanks, Steve.
IMG_20180104_174617922[1].jpg (143.3 KB)
IMG_20180104_174639229[1].jpg (140.4 KB)
No offense to OldManTaylor or to your faith in his vintage Plvmb prowess, but I'd have to see two WF-6 9/32-inch drive spinners - together, in the same photo - to believe it. Such is the level of my astonishment. And yes, that most certainly IS a (friendly) challenge!Lug: i wouldn't be surprised if OLD MAN doesn't have 2 or more of those cause he has quite a few PLVMB goodies living almost next to the old factory.
No offense to OldManTaylor or to your faith in his vintage Plvmb prowess, but I'd have to see two WF-6 9/32-inch drive spinners - together, in the same photo - to believe it. Such is the level of my astonishment. And yes, that most certainly IS a (friendly) challenge!![]()
While I was at it I took a picture of what I believe to be a military kit assembled during WWII. The sockets look like Craftsman, but all of the other parts appear to be Plomb. The only part with any identification at all is the 1/4" extension, 4761.
OLD MAN: AWESOME!!!
they look NOS (new old stock) so did you spiff them up or are they actually NOS?
if you want to post up your shiny stuff we'd love you to post them here if they apply or on this new thread that you might like too.
https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=377463
thanks in advance
Interesting set - please post up more pics.
Anyone know the application for this USN NAF socket? 1/2" drive, cad finish, appears to be unused. Has an internal plastic ring similar to that used in some automotive spark plug sockets. Aircraft spark plug socket?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Challenge well met, omt! (I'll trust you on the second!)Well, if I've got two I couldn't find the second one.
I've never seen or heard of Plomb using their safety environment copper coating process (which they called KOP-R-KLAD) on WF tools, but it sure looks like it could be a copper coating to me. If it's not a safety coating, perhaps it's a copper undercoating they were still using on tools, including for their early WF contract production (1/41, 6/41) prior to copper restrictions going into effect in late 1941, and the chrome plate wore off. Copper undercoating has been seen on other Plomb tools from the same era. Not sure about Plomb WF tools. It'll be interesting if others show up.I ran across this, my only WF-130. Is this a copper clad?
I can look up the NAF stock number in my US Navy Aviation Supply Office Class 41 next week. Unless Unaiu or d42jeep stop by. An enterprising member who shall remain nameless digitized the hardcopies I scanned and mailed out and would be able to look it up sooner.Anyone know the application for this USN NAF socket?
All Bethlehem Spark Plug Company tools were "copper-plated" (for rust prevention, not for non-sparking purposes) and I have found other so far unidentified copper-plated tools from the same era (also probably for rust prevention, not for non-sparking purposes). See a thread I started on the subject, linked here. And you can go here for four.cycle's thread on Bethlehem products. As I alluded to in my reply to omt, Plomb sold a line of tools in the late 1930's through at least 1941 called KOP-R-KLAD, advertised as "HEAVILY COPPER COATED BY A SPECIAL PROCESS". They stopped short of calling them non-sparking, or guaranteeing them as non-sparking, using terms like "spark reduction" and "lessening the possible hazard" instead.don't take it to the bank, but i think just copper would have been too soft for tools.
Anyone know the application for this USN NAF socket? 1/2" drive, cad finish, appears to be unused. Has an internal plastic ring similar to that used in some automotive spark plug sockets. Aircraft spark plug socket?
![]()
My newest piece.