AntiqueBen
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2021
- Messages
- 1,438
So, would a type 7 be the first no. 5 1/2 offered since type 7's we're made from 1893-99?








www.timetestedtools.net

To enhance the marking for the photo, I cleaned the area with lacquer thinner, then rubbed white lumber crayon (grease pencil) onto the surface, pushing pretty hard, and building up a layer above the surface. I followed this by rolling the area with a smooth, polished round object (a socket) to compact the crayon in the grooves. I then scraped off the excess with a razor blade. This leaves the grooves filled, and a slight film of grease pencil on the surface. To get rid of the excess, I dampened a small area of a rag in thinner and let it almost evaporate. I then took quick, light swipes across the area in various directions, pausing between swipes to let things dry. This slowly removed most of the excess, and I left that, rather than risk removing some that I was trying to retain. It did make the markings stand out.




Good catch! I like the early stuff.Picked up an early, circa 1869 type 2 Stanley # 6. It has the early solid nut without "Bailey" that was used only in 1869. It does show some signs of use. in fact, the blade is a post 1923 sweetheart that is almost used up, implying that it was in service for 60-80 years


"Trimmed" is a kind word, the horn was broken off. These early pre-lateral totes are so rare that there really is no choice except to "graft" on a new piece of rosewood. That type of damage is usually the result of dropping the plane or excessive force applied because of too deep a cut or a dull blade.Is the back handle correct or was it trimmed?


alsoNever seen one that color, Canadian special maybe?
Wonder who made it. Doesn’t appear to be Sargent by the iron. Does it have the Millers Falls ovals on the back of the frog?
well, now that you say so, it’s kinda obvious. Wasn’t looking there before.I'm certain that this was made by stanley because it has "BAILEY" cast into the base.