To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Show us your handplanes

ararat

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
585
Location
Ararat NC
Thank you for the information and will have to check my spokeshaves. I’m more of a user than a collector ,so I collect what I could use building furniture and boats . Of course if it looked cool and unique I would buy it for eye candy..
Yeah, got lots of tools that I bought because they look cool.

Nice boat and nice workspace you have.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

milkovich

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
681
Location
Akron Ohio
I picked this up in a lot of tools (I was probably after the chisels) but I can't get a discernable makers mark. I've seen this exact model as a keen kutter though. Any ideas who sold it? IMG_7108.jpgIMG_7110.jpg
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,093
Location
SF Bay Area
I picked this up in a lot of tools (I was probably after the chisels) but I can't get a discernable makers mark. I've seen this exact model as a keen kutter though. Any ideas who sold it?
There were lots in that general shape, but the blade depth of cut adjusters should reduce that list.

I think Osborne made one, and they succeeded Wm Johnson. I have two or three unmarked ones.

DSC09609-X2.jpg
 

ararat

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
585
Location
Ararat NC
I picked this up in a lot of tools (I was probably after the chisels) but I can't get a discernable makers mark. I've seen this exact model as a keen kutter though. Any ideas who sold it? IMG_7108.jpgIMG_7110.jpg
I also have a similar one. It's marked Charles Henry Sheffield.
 

Attachments

  • 20240809_130426.jpg
    20240809_130426.jpg
    631.8 KB · Views: 11
  • 20240809_130438.jpg
    20240809_130438.jpg
    442.9 KB · Views: 5
  • 20240809_130451.jpg
    20240809_130451.jpg
    425.5 KB · Views: 5

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,093
Location
SF Bay Area
I'm curious if the dimensions match the original pattern or if your plane is 1% to 2% smaller due to casting shrinkage.
3/16" per foot shrinkage gives 1.5%. That's some tight measuring on something small.

I'd also look at things like the handle, is it hollow like original casting, details missing, etc.
 

454ragtop

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
5,011
Location
Carver, MA
Picked up a couple real nice block planes in the last couple weeks, a Stanley 60-1/2 with adjustable throat and a vintage Craftsman.
 

Attachments

  • 20240728_124423_resized.jpg
    20240728_124423_resized.jpg
    395 KB · Views: 7
  • 20240728_124431_resized.jpg
    20240728_124431_resized.jpg
    390 KB · Views: 8
  • 20240728_165654.jpg
    20240728_165654.jpg
    246.8 KB · Views: 9
  • 20240810_115210_resized.jpg
    20240810_115210_resized.jpg
    593.3 KB · Views: 10
  • 20240810_115220_resized.jpg
    20240810_115220_resized.jpg
    361.4 KB · Views: 15

milkovich

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
681
Location
Akron Ohio
And I suppose only cost you $10-15 too, just to add to the sweetness. 607 or 608¿. Corrugated?
No, another bidder knew what it was too so it was $80. It’s a 607 smooth bottom, my second favorite size. If I could only have two planes, the 4 1/2 and the 7 are them.
 

hsvtoolfool

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
185
Location
Rocket City USA
3/16" per foot shrinkage gives 1.5%. That's some tight measuring on something small.

I'd also look at things like the handle, is it hollow like original casting, details missing, etc.
Agree about the lost casting details.

Please check my math, but 1% of an inch is 0.010" (aka 10 thou). That's not hard to measure with common calipers. Or is that not how casting shrinkage works?

On the other hand, any pattern can be "tweaked" by adding some plaster/paint to build up areas that will be machined later.

The orginal #192 was 1" wide. I would just love know if it's super-close or way off the original width.
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,093
Location
SF Bay Area
Please check my math, but 1% of an inch is 0.010" (aka 10 thou). That's not hard to measure with common calipers. Or is that not how casting shrinkage works?
I think you are correct, but remember these were probably machined a bit originally, so two models from the same line on the same day could be off by about that much, especially on something like a 78, where both faces may get touched. I think this adds more challenge to the checking than the ability to measure.

Something like a cast handle might be better, as it wasn't machined as much, maybe just polished. But a bench plane doesn't have that option.
 

GaryM909

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,519
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
I have two that I have owned for years and actually used the 6” Craftsman one quite a bit. The only markings on the 9” one is “No 3”. I never used it
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1706.jpeg
    IMG_1706.jpeg
    821.9 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_1705.jpeg
    IMG_1705.jpeg
    931.3 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_1703.jpeg
    IMG_1703.jpeg
    614.7 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_1702.jpeg
    IMG_1702.jpeg
    854.8 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_1701.jpeg
    IMG_1701.jpeg
    874.1 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_1704.jpeg
    IMG_1704.jpeg
    834.5 KB · Views: 18

ararat

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
585
Location
Ararat NC
I have two that I have owned for years and actually used the 6” Craftsman one quite a bit. The only markings on the 9” one is “No 3”. I never used it
No 3 looks very modern, not sure if it will give good results. The craftsman should be a good user. If it is marked BB, then it would made by Millers Falls. BL would be Sargent. May be on the side of the body or on the blade.
 

GaryM909

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,519
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
No 3 looks very modern, not sure if it will give good results. The craftsman should be a good user. If it is marked BB, then it would made by Millers Falls. BL would be Sargent. May be on the side of the body or on the blade.
All I could find was DD on the blade.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1711.jpeg
    IMG_1711.jpeg
    725.6 KB · Views: 19
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

GaryM909

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,519
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,093
Location
SF Bay Area
The "DD" stamp was applied on the Millers Falls irons between 1936 and 1948

I didn't think it was that old. I bought it about 30 years ago at a garage sale and used it quite bit. I haven't had a use for it for quite a few years now.
Blades are easy to change, you can swap a Stanley of almost any era into a Millers Falls, or Sargent, of any era. Worst thing to use for plane dating, but sometimes all we have at hand.

With that color scheme, it looks post 1950s to me, and maybe up to 1975 or so. Some intense googling and ogling of images might find out who sold it, and maybe who made it. But I suspect a lower level player. More later.
 

hop up

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
121
Agree about the lost casting details.

Please check my math, but 1% of an inch is 0.010" (aka 10 thou). That's not hard to measure with common calipers. Or is that not how casting shrinkage works?

On the other hand, any pattern can be "tweaked" by adding some plaster/paint to build up areas that will be machined later.

The orginal #192 was 1" wide. I would just love know if it's super-close or way off the original width.
What’s interesting is its .006 over size 1.006 and had to check it out with a micrometer. As we know a caliper is just a rough measurement in tan my tool and die trade. Plus it’s very consistent as well with high details.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    630.3 KB · Views: 23

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,093
Location
SF Bay Area

hop up

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
121
Thank you @RTM and for the wonderful link I know what I’m doing for the rest of the afternoon :)
 

hsvtoolfool

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
185
Location
Rocket City USA
What’s interesting is its .006 over size 1.006 and had to check it out with a micrometer. As we know a caliper is just a rough measurement in tan my tool and die trade. Plus it’s very consistent as well with high details.
So somebody must have "built up" the original plane sides, bottom, and perhaps the throat with paint, plaster, clay (or whatever) then created a wax mold for bronze casting. The amount of hobby work in that plane is just plain crazy. I love it.
 

hop up

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
121
@hsvtoolfool I’m sure it was on government time lol . I’m thinking maybe made up out of mahogany to test ones shrinking mathematics . What I like about it besides being different but the weight as it has a great feel when making chips.
 

ararat

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
585
Location
Ararat NC
@ararat thank you for the id I haven’t heard of that maker before do you have more information
They made it into modern times selling garden pruners and loppers etc. I think their stuff was pretty good quality. I'd guess our spokeshaves are early 1900's. I've used mine a lot making chisel handles and tool handles.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom