At risk of

:but not wanting to

: I do not understand the Craftsman bashing around here.
Nobody ever posts actual facts about warranty rates, defect rates, alloy composition or actual lab tests concerning tool durability and strength. All I ever see is COO and anecdotal hyperbole.
To me, it seems almost irrational. Kinda like a Honda owner telling me Chrysler has bad transmissions. Wait! What! Do you really believe your perpetually recalled Honda transmission is better quality than the ZF 8 speed in my Mopar!
I have a garage full of Craftsman tools and other equipment that I have accumulated over the past 30 years. From my experience, the quality of the tools has increased substantially over the past 30 years regardless of COO. The only reason for the abundance of Craftsman tools is the value proposal of the tool. I also have quite a few of the Harbor Freight air tools for the same reason. My Husky tool boxes were brought for the same reason, build quality for the price.
I visit a Sears, Home Depot and Harbor Freight almost weekly. With rare exceptions, the Craftsman tools, when on sale, always present the best value out there. Surprisingly, over the past several years, Harbor Freight has become more expensive for the same or lower quality tools than the Craftsman.
I can understand professional mechanics who's income depends upon the ability to have someone come to the shop to replace a tool.
I even get the COO warriors as I also like to support my fellow American worker.
For home DIY repairs and home mechanics like me, Craftsman, Kobalt, Husky, Gearwrench, etc.. are all the same quality. They are all good enough and in most cases will outlive the original purchaser and their grandchildren.
Yes, there are better tools, but not for the money and having tools which will last for my great grandchildren over just my grandchildren is not a real value proposal.
For some odd reason, the Craftsman name brings up often hostile inexplicable hatred. I don't get it.