smallworkshop.co.uk
^ Exactly.
One of my favorites is a 1960's era P2 "Challenger".
Since acquiring the Vessels I VERY seldom pull that old Challenger out - the Vessels are usually my "go to" for anything Phillips, unless it's in a hole and then I go for a long skinny Rosco. (IF the 200mm Vessel won't reach.)
I have no shortage of screwdrivers.
I have an over-abundance of screwdrivers I no longer use.
^ Again, I've read through ALL of these threads in which "JIS" has been discussed, and I fail to see what the problem is. I don't work on Japanese cars or motorcycles - maybe I'm missing something.
Most of my old P1 and P2 phillips drivers have worn out to the point where should probably just be tossed out - the photos should make that evident.
I bought my first Vessel on a recommendation from Nelson Bowers, and I am more than happy with all the Vessels I've purchased so far.
Somebody mentioned "electrical" - I've used that "Glow-in-the-dark" P2 Vessel on light fixtures over at the studio without any issues.
The ONLY issue I have is that "JAWSFIT" design which WILL eventually damage the fastener - that set I posted above was a Christmas gift for a buddy, and I did not know at the time the issue with that type of driver or I would have made a different choice - there's no way he's going to use those on the stuff he works on (mostly computers.)

Yes, and "lot" is an understatement.There seems to be a lot of FUD on the internet about JIS.
That was not Vessel, it was the US importers.Vessel used to claim IIRC that nobody could label screwdrivers w/ the JIS mark yet JIS B 4633 for all I can tell is still a valid and different standard from DIN/ISO.
Yes, and "lot" is an understatement.
That was not Vessel, it was the US importers.
The standard is still valid and in use.
Jack
Sorry, I'm not sure which link you are referring to. JIS standards cover the tip design and the fastener dimensions - just as ISO standards do.Yup. From what it seems the link above I posted it sounds like the JIS mark was more equivalent to an ISO 9000 certification versus the design of the tip.
Sorry, I'm not sure which link you are referring to. JIS standards cover the tip design and the fastener dimensions - just as ISO standards do.
Most countries have their own standards organisation and often, a local standard is identical, or very close to, an ISO standard. That applies to the UK and Australia as well as Japan.
In the case of "JIS" screws and drivers, I think the ISO adopted the good parts of the JIS standard to create a driver that worked.
Jack
smallworkshop.co.uk
Which vessel are you comparing them to?I have both, but have to disagree with a lot that I've seen in this thread. I have the Snap On Instinct soft handles, but I wanted a JIS screwdriver. Imo the Snap On are significantly nicer than the Vessel. The Vessel just feels and looks cheaper. It's one of the more disappointing tool purchases I've made. I guess I was expecting something great, but it seems like I'm most cases on Japanese screws the SO #2 grabs it just as well if not better. If the SO doesn't get it out, the Vessel usually isn't either.
![]()
JIS screwdrivers, screws and fasteners from Japan
If you've ever worked on a vintage Japanese motorcycle you've almost certainly struggled with countless buggered-up cross head screws. The usual recommendation to avoid further screw mangling is to put aside your old Phillips screwdrivers and get some "JIS" ones instead. There is a lot of...smallworkshop.co.uk
The author seems to have a good understanding of the FUD around JIS. To him the translation from Vessel was somewhat unclear when it indicated they were no longer JIS compliant. It appears that Vessel no longer meets the manufacturing standards required to mark a product with the JIS logo, which is unrelated to manufacturing drivers to the JIS standard for the tips.
Got an example? Usually 'S' is slot.i have seen reference to types H, S, and Z crosspoints. anyone know what that's about? i assume Z is pozidriv...
SGot an example? Usually 'S' is slot.
Z would be Pozidriv. I don't know what that S means but I would guess "spinner"S
H, Z![]()
You could be right about the limited depth of the recess but I think the increased engagement of the Torx bit makes up for it. In any case, all sorts of structural countersunk screws in the US are torx head, with no apparent issues.Torx works very well with things like cap screws, where there is a good depth of head available.
It doesn’t work well with things like countersunk screws. Because the screw head tapers, you end up with either a very shallow screw recess, or more usually, using a much smaller recess than the size of screw would normally warrant.
Phillips, or Pozidriv, are a much better option in these cases as the tool can enter the fastener for a good depth.

Your vague reply is much less helpful.Unless someone wants to call the JIS and tell them they don't exist I think there is very little information there.
Jack
I'm sorry but I have responded many times on this and other similar threads but the same old stuff keeps coming back.Your vague reply is much less helpful.
I saw we take off, and get a screwdriver (or a set) from every country.
It's the only way to be sure.
This was an epiphany for me that had me blowing up the text inbox of many friends.I prefer the Vessel mainly because the jis phillips doesn't strip screws.
When did they ever use the JIS product certification mark?
The JIS standard for cross point screw drivers has changed, but not significantly, and not so that they are no longer compatible with fasteners made to the old standard. I think some are trying to say that new drivers are not the same as the old ones and no longer work with vintage equipment. I think that is rubbish.
I love them to, I to wish I had known sooner considering I have thirteen Honda'sThis was an epiphany for me that had me blowing up the text inbox of many friends.
I love the handles, too.
I got the megadora impacta in JIS #2 and #3 along with their pick set that includes the "chisel style screwdriver" and I love these tools. I regret only that I went so many years without them. The first time you use an Impacta on a japanese brake rotor you might literally laugh out loud as I did. It feels like cheating!
I haven't used any Snap Ons since the old black handled ones, and I'm comfortable putting the Vessels well ahead of them.
I looked at my order history and it looks like the Vessel Megadora is the model.Which vessel are you comparing them to?
Thanks for that.My package finally arrived from Tokyo. Here is the original JIS specifications from the 1950s.
Think this sums up the fact that nothing has changed over the years with the dimensions.
Any quality JIS or ISO screwdriver should fit anything with a JIS crosshead from any era.
Thanks for that.
How did you manage to get an old standard? Do you know the Emperor?
Jack
Good to know.Apparently once you find out how to do a wire transfer to Japan in Yen they'll send you a cool paper copy (no PDF available?!?) via UPS.
Very nice people and surprisingly the cost wasn't too bad compared to standards you'd find from ANSI & ISO. Well packaged too.
Hello Brandon,
Hello Brandon,
I'm the author of the article on smallworkshop.co.uk you linked above.
I had come across the theory that the current JIS crosshead specification was some kind of compromise solution, replacing an older version of the spec - hence much speculation on the existence of "true" JIS drivers that match the old spec - but I could not find any evidence to substantiate this.
... so it's great that you have managed to track down proof that the JIS spec has in fact not changed since the 50s (bar a minor tightening on a couple of tolerances) and that the theory above is not correct. Would you mind if I included the image above in my article?
PS does anyone have copies of the US (ASME?) crosshead screwdriver specs? I assume this spec has also now been harmonised with the JIS/ISO standard but have not been able to find any proof.