dkmc
Well-known member
So I have a thought on Dust Collection.
If I should post this in a separate thread, I will, just let me know.
I've never seen a dual cyclone dust collection system and I'm wondering why not.
Most more elaborate commercial systems, Siphon or Pressure have a "Reclaimer" and then the fines go into a dust collector with some sort of filter bag, pleated paper, etc. The fine dust clogs up the filter so quickly, there are features in place to clean the filters mechanically, or with a blast of air.
The woodworking crowd uses a cyclone to separate out all the chips, dust, and fines, and then sends the mostly clean air to the filter element, which keeps it clean-er and lot longer.
I'm wondering why the commercial systems don't use a second cyclone after the reclaimer to catch mostly all the fines, and then send the mostly clean air to the filters.
The filters would stay much cleaner, and time would be saved without having to clean them so much. Any blast cabinet that gets used a fair amount, would benefit from reduced labor and downtime and from less frequent stops for cleaning the filters, and the filters would last longer, so cost savings there. Filter bags, or the large cylindrical pleated filters are costily to replace when they wear out. Every time they are upset with cleaning methods, (mechanically shaken, or air blast) they wear out a bit. Seems like the second cyclone separator would pay for itself in not a very long time.
Any thoughts on this, please lets hear them.
If I should post this in a separate thread, I will, just let me know.
I've never seen a dual cyclone dust collection system and I'm wondering why not.
Most more elaborate commercial systems, Siphon or Pressure have a "Reclaimer" and then the fines go into a dust collector with some sort of filter bag, pleated paper, etc. The fine dust clogs up the filter so quickly, there are features in place to clean the filters mechanically, or with a blast of air.
The woodworking crowd uses a cyclone to separate out all the chips, dust, and fines, and then sends the mostly clean air to the filter element, which keeps it clean-er and lot longer.
I'm wondering why the commercial systems don't use a second cyclone after the reclaimer to catch mostly all the fines, and then send the mostly clean air to the filters.
The filters would stay much cleaner, and time would be saved without having to clean them so much. Any blast cabinet that gets used a fair amount, would benefit from reduced labor and downtime and from less frequent stops for cleaning the filters, and the filters would last longer, so cost savings there. Filter bags, or the large cylindrical pleated filters are costily to replace when they wear out. Every time they are upset with cleaning methods, (mechanically shaken, or air blast) they wear out a bit. Seems like the second cyclone separator would pay for itself in not a very long time.
Any thoughts on this, please lets hear them.
Last edited:







Couple it to a diesel engine?