454ragtop
Well-known member
Dunlap 5239. Only have the weight so far. 13lbs
Kevin, 3-1/2" jaws, opens 3-1/4".
Dunlap 5239. Only have the weight so far. 13lbs
Kevin, 3-1/2" jaws, opens 3-1/4".
Kevin, For the spreadsheet, my Athol 624 1/2 weighed in at 73.8 lbs.
Mike
Re: Vise Info Thread
Guess this is not for the record.
No Manufacturer on the vise, thinking Bonney.
These #s are on the anvil
PATD JUNE 2ND 91
#? 2 1/2
2.38 lbs
opens 2"
1 7/8 jaws
akasrick
Thanks akasrick, does it have a quick release? just seeing the spindle pivoting and was thinking it is a quick release.
Kevin, that Prentiss (points up) is a 513, as cast into the main body. The dynamic has both 513 and 523 cast into it as the dynamic could also be used in a swivel base or swivel jaw main body, one of which likely would be the 523. Have a Prentiss swivel base swivel jaw with the dual marked dynamic.
Columbian D45-M3. 5" Jaws that opens to 6". Weight ???
kms:
That baby double swivelller is way cool. Is that yours or are you working on it for a customer or ????
Chas Parker # 87 Combination Vise. 3-1/2" jaws that opens only 3"? Is this correct? Weights 47lbs.


Welcome to GJ. Try posting your question and some pics of your vise over in this thread.Hello All , I'm new to G.J just wanted to say hello and ask if anyone knows where i might obtain a swivel base for my newly acquired C Parker GG vise. It's a monster and before i start trying to fabricate something i figure the original parts would be better.
Chas Parker # 52. Early Swivel Jaw. No spec:s on this vise and only one Picture.
Kevin, funny you should ask this. I picked up an 87 last year, couple pics in this post https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/showthread.php?p=6474650&highlight=Parker#post6474650 Real nice shape other than missing the handle. A while later I came across another Parker for cheap, think it was a fixed base and not a combo, and figured I'd swap the screw since it had a handle. Well you can imagine my surprise when I saw how short the screw out of the 87 was. I inspected it closely expecting to find evidence of a break, nope. Installed the longer screw from the other vise, pat myself on the back for restoring the capacity of the vise. A few months later stumbled across a catalog page and was surprised to see the small opening. So now I'm in a quandary, swap the screw back to keep it original, or leave the longer screw because it actually makes more sense? I have a few catalog page pics from 1916-1925 showing this vise, most show 3-5/8" jaws that open to 4-3/4", but the 1922 page shows 3-1/2" jaws that open to 3". I didn't actually measure mine before I swapped the screw, but there was quite a bit of slide hanging out the back of the static jaw as the screw ran out.